纳尔逊·格雷本的"旅游人类学"

近几十年来,随着旅游业的蓬勃发展,许多国家对旅游业的研究,从各个方面得到了深入的发展,并上升到一定的理论高度.在一些西方国家里,一些旅游业研究的学者提出了"旅游人类学"这一新的学说,使旅游业的研究又上了一个更高的台阶,拓宽了研究的领域,促进了旅游业的新发展.纳尔逊·格雷本(Nelson Graburn)是美国加州大学柏克利分校的人类学家,他的旅游人类学理论有独到的思想观点和模式,引起了人类学界的广泛关注.     

对公安机关党风廉政建设的哲学思考

公安机关需要按照中央"三个更加注重"方略,扎扎实实推进反腐倡廉建设各项工作,谨防"蝴蝶效应",遵循"南风法则";谨防"破窗效应",遵循"分粥法则";谨防"多米诺骨牌效应",遵循"火炉法则",为公安机关切实承担起三项政治历史责任提供坚强的政治保障和纪律保证。     

The Loss of Nature in Axel Honneth's Social Philosophy. Rereading Mead with Merleau-Ponty

Abstract

This paper analyses the model of interaction at the heart of Axel Honneth's social philosophy. It argues that inter action in his mature ethics of recognition has been reduced to intercourse between human persons and that the role of nature is now missing from it. The ethics of recognition takes into account neither the material dimensions of individual and social action, nor the normative meaning of non-human persons and natural environments. The loss of nature in the mature ethics of recognition is made visible through a comparison with Honneth's initial formulation of his project. As an anthropology of intersubjectivity combining the teaching of the German philosophical anthropologists and G.H. Mead, his first model sought to ground social theory in the natural preconditions of human action. The last part of the article argues that a return to Mead's theory of practical intersubjectivity informed by Merleau-Ponty's germane theory of intercorporeity provides essential conceptual tools to enable the integration of the natural and the material within the theory of recognition.     

Teaching Forensic Entomology,Forensic Anthropology,and Haematology & Serology during the COVID-19 pandemic: Practical activities for distance learning

As the COVID-19 pandemic upended college and university instruction throughout the world, instructors were hard-pressed to find suitable alternatives for practical activities typically carried out outside of classrooms—in laboratories, workshops, clinics, and in the field. In response to this unanticipated challenge, they relied on their ingenuity to achieve pre-pandemic goals under pandemic conditions that necessitated the shift to online teaching. The Forensic Science Undergraduate Program housed in the School of Medicine of the National Autonomous University of Mexico was not exempt from this educational upheaval but, due to its interdisciplinary nature, required creating and/or adopting a wide range of activities capable of training students to perform practical tasks associated with subject areas that span the natural and social sciences, the humanities, and the law. This report aims to describe the approaches undertaken in three subjects (Forensic Entomology, Forensic Anthropology, and Hematology & Serology) by interviewing instructors and examining their teaching materials. Also, through online surveys, students’ reactions to these approaches were elicited to learn about their suitability and teaching potential. Instructor’s experiences during the pandemic have proven to be a rich source of ingenious solutions, with implications well-beyond the current crisis, such as creating blended or fully online courses aimed at larger numbers of students, forensic and legal professionals, and even other instructors. The wide variety of forensic sciences offers the opportunity to innovate and improve the teaching and learning of science, particularly to the benefit of students that must combine their school tasks with professional and/or family duties.     

行政学本土化：历史、生态和哲学的途径

行政学本土化是中国行政学发展的必由之路和社会发展的必然要求，不仅是行政学自身学科体系建设的需要，而且是中国历史转型时期社会发展的要求。从行政学历史发展、行政学生态分析、行政学哲学思考等三种途径建构行政学本土化的理论平台、切入点、突破口，将有助于中国行政学本土化的进程。     

20世纪中国哲学史研究模式析论

20世纪的中国哲学史研究,大致存在三种模式,即:本土化的研究模式;西方化的研究模式;中西结合的研究模式。相比较而言,最后一种研究模式最为合理,而前两种研究模式皆存在一定的弊端。我们应继续坚持中西结合的研究模式,将中国哲学史研究继续推向深入。     

中国哲学理论界的现状与前瞻

当今社会的发展,一方面充分体现出发展与繁荣中国哲学社会科学的必要性,另一方面又对中国哲学理论界提出了更高的要求。     

唯物史观是马克思在社会科学哲学层次的发现——马克思的发现片论之四

唯物史观并非如传统理论所理解的是马克思的哲学贡献,而是马克思把自己创立的新哲学——实践唯物主义应用于历史的贡献,即社会科学哲学的贡献。由恩格斯对这一发现的阐述,对列宁、斯大林的辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义的解读模式作现象学还原,都可证明这一点。透析当前学界对什么是历史唯物主义之争,也可证明这一点。双方的对立是表面的,因为两者所论并不在同一层次上。一方所论,是对作为哲学的历史唯物主义即实践唯物主义的论证;另一方所论是对作为社会科学哲学的历史唯物主义即唯物史观的论证。双方立论的依据及据以展开的阐述对于自己所论证的历史唯物主义概念都是合理的。     

Historical Trends in Graduate Research and Training of Diplomates of the American Board of Forensic Anthropology

The history of forensic anthropology has been documented by numerous scholars. These contributions have described the work of early pioneers in the field and have described important milestones, such as the founding of the Physical Anthropology Section of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) in 1972 and the American Board of Forensic Anthropology (ABFA) in 1977. This paper contributes to the growing literature on the history of forensic anthropology by documenting the academic training of all individuals who have been granted diplomate status by the ABFA (n = 115). Doctoral dissertation titles were queried to discern broad patterns of research foci. A total of 39 doctoral granting institutions have trained diplomates and 77.3% of board‐certified forensic anthropologists wrote dissertations involving skeletal biology, bioarchaeology, or forensic anthropology. Board‐certified forensic anthropologists are a broadly trained group of professionals with far‐reaching anthropological interests and expertise.     

论民族哲学、文化研究统一的必要性

哲学与文化原本就是互生、互动的 ,只是在学科分化后才被人为地分割开来。这种相互疏离和分割 ,既不利于准确、完整地把握特定民族国家的哲学和文化 ,也不利于各民族的自我认识、相互理解以及哲学、文化自身的发展 ,因此民族哲学研究、民族文化研究需要重新结合。即 ,民族文化的完整研究必须用哲学研究来统摄 ,民族哲学的完整研究也必须以文化研究为依托 ,二者相互补充、相互结合