首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   478篇
  免费   24篇
各国政治   36篇
工人农民   1篇
世界政治   16篇
外交国际关系   44篇
法律   47篇
中国共产党   2篇
中国政治   5篇
政治理论   334篇
综合类   17篇
  2024年   1篇
  2023年   10篇
  2022年   4篇
  2021年   22篇
  2020年   38篇
  2019年   26篇
  2018年   19篇
  2017年   31篇
  2016年   52篇
  2015年   15篇
  2014年   29篇
  2013年   86篇
  2012年   30篇
  2011年   20篇
  2010年   23篇
  2009年   10篇
  2008年   9篇
  2007年   7篇
  2006年   12篇
  2005年   10篇
  2004年   14篇
  2003年   13篇
  2002年   10篇
  2001年   4篇
  2000年   3篇
  1999年   3篇
  1998年   1篇
排序方式: 共有502条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
501.
This study examined the relationship between Turkish voters’ ethical characteristics and voting tendencies to the political left, right, or center by applying the Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ) and Mach IV to the collection of data for analysis from 500 voters in a national election in Turkey. The most significant finding is that there was no statistically meaningful relationship among levels of idealism, relativism, or Machiavellianism and voting tendencies to the political left, right, and center. However, results generated by EPQ and Mach IV questionnaire found that voting tendencies were affected by personal relativism (0.10), followed by Machiavellianism (?0.03) and idealism (?0.03). Results show that respondents’ voting tendency was most affected by the level of their personal relativism, but the magnitude of the effect was not statistically significant. The mean scores for Machiavellianism and relativism attributes were on average in the mid-range of the scale, while mean scores for idealism show that the participating voters agreed most strongly with the statements relating to the idealism and could be characterized as absolutist by their low relativism and high idealism. The results demonstrate a positive linear relationship, linking both idealism and relativism to Machiavellianism and indicate statistically significant positive correlations among the three variables.  相似文献   
502.
Political marketing has borrowed and adapted many terms from mainstream marketing, such as image management (segmentation, targeting, and positioning) and consumer (voter). In marketing, the terms “user” and “usage” have been established, yet their application to political marketing is less clear. This paper analyzes the feasibility and usefulness of usage in the political context. Drawing from the literature on usage, a model is developed and applied to four voting environments: Britain, Australia, Russia, and Belarus. One critical factor that emerges is the concept of choice, whereby the voter may chose to indicate their preference for one party yet be forced to use a different party as chosen by collective choice. Another issue is the potential for habitual voting behavior to limit decision making. It is concluded that usage needs to be contextualized specifically for political marketing.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号