非法利用信息网络罪的适用疑难与教义学表述

生效案件已经暴露了非法利用信息网络罪的罪质不明、追诉标准阙如、司法竞合处置有失妥当、积极适用的司法导向淡薄等问题。基于“利用信息网络”的行为特质,应明确《刑法》第287条之一的网络独立预备犯之立法旨趣,是一般性罪名,起基础性的规制功能,取代《刑法》第287条发挥司法兜底之用。不宜限制解释“其他、等‘违法犯罪’（信息、活动）”,扩张解释更符合第287条之一法定的相对有限的一般性规制功能。“同时构成其他犯罪的,依照处罚较重的规定定罪处罚”是限制刑罚处罚的提示性规定,本罪在实践中与关联犯罪的实质竞合概率应极低。应确认信息网络安全管理秩序的具体法益内容,固化其释法机能。应明确“情节严重”的具体追诉情形,注重通过案例指导制度提供持续性的司法供给。     

网络社会与中国共产党的政治权威

网络社会在改变人类生产、生活方式的过程中,也给中国共产党的政治权威带来深层次的挑战。主要表现为：网络社会容易导致无政府主义;导致民众价值观念的多样化,造成主流意识形态的弱化;网络政治参与的＂膨胀＂易引发民众对现行政治体系的认同危机;网络在加大监督的同时也消蚀着党的形象和威信。要在网络社会中维护和提升党的政治权威需要做到：规范网络秩序,营造网络自律环境;加强网上舆论引导和网上理论阵地建设;畅通网络民意渠道,尊重民意;坚持党要管党,从严治党的原则。     

谈网络群体性事件的成因及其防范

伴随着互联网的快速发展,网络已成为当今社会信息传播的主要媒介之一。网络群体性事件的发生与发展不仅迅猛,而且其事件的影响度和被关注度已非常之大,远远超出了人们对现实社会的群体性事件的把握与控制能力。因而,研究目前网络群体性事件的特点、成因,以及探讨网络群体性事件的防范策略,对疏导舆情、构建和谐社会具有重要的现实意义。     

高校毕业生就业服务体系的网络结构和运行机制

采用逻辑演绎和比较分析方法,结合中国高校毕业生特点以及就业服务参与主体的优势和劣势,从促进多主体相互合作的角度研究就业服务体系的网络结构和运行机制,尝试将相关主体进行结构化,建立就业服务体系的网络结构,探讨各主体在这一网络结构中的职责和沟通协作的途径,并归纳阐述保障这一网络结构顺畅运行的机制。在充分利用互联网平台基础之上,完善各项就业保障机制,通过构建合作统一的就业网络结构实现就业效率最大化。研究目的在于完善整个就业服务体系并提高其运行效率,为解决当前毕业生就业难题提供新的思路。     

信息互动视角下“情感过滤”成因探析与对策研究

语言是一个负载信息的符号系统,交际是一个信息在交际者之间双向或多向的互动过程,信息的共享是交际活动的目的,信息的互动是交际活动的本质,语言的运用是交际的主要形式。“情感过滤”是一个人情感因素对语言习得和信息输入、输出产生的影响。学习动机、语言焦虑、语言态度、自我意象、自信心和移情等是造成“情感过滤”的主要因素,关注交际意义而非形式、关注交际情境、实现可理解性信息输入是降低“情感过滤”的有效策略。     

运用信息网络科技创建村（社）级惩防腐败体系的实践与思考

依托较为成熟的信息网络,努力探索和创建村（社）级特色惩防腐败体系,是广东省江门市蓬江区基层农村党风廉政建设的一大特色和亮点。地处城乡结合部、基础较好的篁庄股份合作经济联合社,按照广东“开放、动态、创新”惩防腐败体系和“数字珠三角洲”的需要,运用信息网络科技,打造“数字篁庄”,进行党风廉政宣传教育,实行社务网上阳光工程,增强了社务的公开、透明程度,拉近了干部、党员与群众的距离,促进了社务与民生的和谐,取得了良好成效,积累了一些经验,为深入推进全区党风廉政建设,促进社会和谐发展,走出了一条新路。     

The regulatory state in developing countries: Redistribution and regulatory failure in Brazil

Following the traditional doctrine of the “regulatory state”, regulatory agencies should be given very focused mandates and stay away from the politicized realm of distributive policies and decisions. An opposing perspective would state that if regulatory agencies can contribute to economic redistribution, positive results such as network expansion, economies of scale, and fiscal efficiency will ultimately lead to lower levels of regulatory failure. This article tests whether, in countries of high socio-economic inequality, such as Brazil, the active incorporation of distributive considerations by regulatory agencies leads to lower levels of failure. Through the analysis of the activities of seven Brazilian network regulatory agencies, the article develops theory-driven expectations and tests these expectations using crisp set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA). It concludes that not prioritizing redistribution is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for regulatory agencies' failure. In most types of failure, a lack of priority to redistribution leads to failure when combined with low regulatory capacity and low levels of competence.     

以社会主义核心价值体系引领网络舆论

当下我国工业化、信息化交替进行,网络舆论以其独特个性对执政党意识形态工作发挥重大影响。能否实现网络舆论的有效引领事关党执政地位稳固和国家的长治久安,是舆论引导格局的重要组成部分。当前条件下,实现网络舆论的引领需要重新理解和把握引领的时代意蕴,关键在于以重点人群、主流网络媒体建设及网络舆论掌握与反馈机制为着力点,积极构建网络舆论引领机制。     

Robots,standards and the law: Rivalries between private standards and public policymaking for robot governance

This article explains the complex intertwinement between public and private regulators in the case of robot technology. Public policymaking ensures broad multi-stakeholder protected scope, but its abstractness often fails in intelligibility and applicability. Private standards, on the contrary, are more concrete and applicable, but most of the times they are voluntary and reflect industry interests. The ‘better regulation’ approach of the EU may increase the use of evidence to inform policy and lawmaking, and the involvement of different stakeholders. Current hard-lawmaking instruments do not appear to take advantage of the knowledge produced by standard-based regulations, virtually wasting their potential benefits. This fact affects the legal certainty with regards to a fast-paced changing environment like robotics. In this paper, we investigate the challenges of overlapping public/private regulatory initiatives that govern robot technologies in general, and in the concrete of healthcare robot technologies. We wonder until what extent robotics should be governed only by standards. We also reflect on how public policymaking could increase their technical understanding of robot technology to devise an applicable and comprehensive framework for this technology. In this respect, we propose different ways to integrate the technical know-how into policymaking (e.g., collecting the data/knowledge generated from the impact assessments in shared data repositories, and using it for evidence-based policies) and to strengthen the legitimacy of standards.