浅论违警罪的概念及其处罚

违警罪既有法律之义又有其犯罪学之义。我国法律研究和法律实践中与违警罪联系最紧密的概念是治安违法行为。虽然违法行为相同,但许多国家对其定性和处罚程序都有所差别。这些差别无不与本国的政治体制、司法体制、行政体制密不可分。随着司法国际化的发展,这种区别也将会在各国间相互影响。     

公安高校网络警察培养实验教学体系研究

为了满足各级公安机关对网络警察的需求，很多公安高校增设了信息安全等相关专业，而网络警察培养是一门实践性非常强的学科，公安高校信息安全专业实验教学体系包括基础实验、计算机安全实验和公安业务实验三大部分，网络信息安全类和计算机取证类实验的实验内容、实验课程、实验项目、实验室建设工作值得重点分析研究。     

警察手枪教学与训练中的安全意识培养

在手枪教学过程中,存在较为普遍的用枪安全的问题,以基本训练数据的分析为基础,不断深化对手枪教育过程中安全意识的培养成为必须。目前,应立足现有的教学条件,通过不断加强教官和学员对手枪安全知识的认识与理解,强化手枪教学过程中安全防范各项措施的落实,提高警察手枪教学与训练中的安全系数。     

关于新建公安本科院校教学创新的思考

新建公安本科院校都面临着三年后学位评估和五年后合格评估,面临建设具有鲜明公安特色的教学型本科学院的新形势、新任务,必须创新教学工作。要切实增强教学创新的紧迫感和使命感;要积极探索教学创新的新途径;要为教学创新创造一切条件。     

论国家级考试舞弊行为的刑法规制

根据我国现行刑法的规定,对在国家级考试中实施舞弊行为情节严重的,可处以非法获取国家秘密罪或招收学生徇私舞弊罪等罪名。但对于为舞弊者提供协助行为情节严重的,现行刑法却无力惩处,并且对教师帮助学生实施舞弊行为适用招收学生徇私舞弊罪处罚也有违罪刑法定原则。为弥补刑事法律在规制国家级考试舞弊行为上的不足,必须在刑法中增设＂协助国家级考试舞弊罪＂,以有效地遏制考试舞弊盛行之风。     

高职院校“说专业”活动解析

说专业是专业团队综合素质的展示,也是专业内涵和实力的体现,是三说(说专业、说课程、说管理)交流与沟通平台的重要环节,积极组织好说专业活动,将对高职院校的专业建设起到极大的推动作用。     

公安院校专业课教学与考试制度改革初探

公安院校专业课教学的目标就是要培养实用型的专门人才 ,人才的培养必须依赖于较高的教学质量 ,教学质量的高低则体现在学生的学习成绩上 ,对学生的评价主要依据是考试。目前 ,公安院校专业课教学考试主要采用专统的考试模式 ,即“平时成绩 期末成绩 =学科成绩。这种考试制度的弊端日益突出 ,成绩记分办法不规范 ,主观随意性和盲目性较大 ,缺乏科学依据。素质教育的呼声要求我们必须从考试方法 ,考试内容、成绩记分等方面实行全方位的改革 ,实行作业、口试、开卷笔试、模拟训练、闭卷笔试等“综合测试的方法来检验教学效果。其考试模式为 :“11134”制。笔者拟就改革传统考试制度的必要性和实践效果进行探讨分析 ,以请教于从事公安业务教学的前辈和同行。     

Construct Validity of Adolescent Antisocial Personality Disorder

This study examined the construct validity of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) diagnosed in adolescence. Boys and girls were grouped by history of DSM-III-R conduct disorder (CD) and ASPD: Controls (n=340) had neither diagnosis; CD Only (n=77) had CD by age 17 but no ASPD through age 20; Adolescent ASPD (n = 64) had ASPD by age 17. The Adolescent ASPD group was then compared to 20 young adult men who met criteria for ASPD (ASPD group). As expected, the Adolescent ASPD group had significantly more depression and substance use disorders, a greater performance>verbal IQ discrepancy, more deviant peers, and poorer academic functioning than the CD Only group and Controls. The Adolescent ASPD and ASPD groups did not differ on most variables. Results support the construct validity of Adolescent ASPD and suggest that such a diagnosis could help identify adolescents at risk for persistent antisocial behavior. Jeanette Taylor is an Assistant Professor at Florida State University. She received her Ph.D. in 1999 from the University of Minnesota. Her research examines biological, cognitive, and environmental influences on personality disorders and substance use disorders. Irene J. Elkins is a Co-investigator at the Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research. She received her Ph.D. in 1993 from the University of Kansas and is a member of the Society for Research on Psychopathology. Her major research interests include the relationship of personality, ADHD, and antisocial behavior to substance abuse, as well as gene-environment interrelationships. Lisa Legrand is a Research Associate with the Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research at the University of Minnesota. She received her Ph.D. in 2003 from the University of Minnesota. Her major research interests include gene-environment interplay in the development of externalizing psychopathology. Dawn Peuschold is a Senior Clinical Forensic Psychologist at the Hennepin Country District Court and an instructor at the University of Minnesota. She completed a post-doctoral fellowship in forensic psychology at the University of Massachusetts Medical School after receiving her Ph.D. in clinical psychology from the University of Minnesota. She is interested in risk factors for reoffense in juveniles. William G. Iacono is a Distinguished McKnight University Professor at the University of Minnesota, the institution from which he received his Ph.D. in psychology. He conducts longitudinal studies of adolescent twins and adoptees aimed at understanding the development of adult adjustment and mental health.     

A Rationale and Method for Examining Reasons for Linkages Among Adolescent Risk Behaviors

A large volume of research has investigated interrelations among adolescent risk behaviors. Although several theoretical accounts have been proposed, researchers have not directly examined hypotheses for why risk behaviors are linked. In the present paper, a distinction is drawn between predictive factors that explain variance in risk behaviors and “linkage factors” which may provide an explanation for why risk behaviors are interrelated. The relevance of linkage factors to risk behavior research, theory, and practice is described. Further, a simple to use and easy to interpret analytic technique for exploring linkage-related issues is illustrated. Using this technique, hypotheses regarding the role of predictors in explaining linkages among risk behaviors can be tested directly. The proposed line of inquiry will provide valuable input for intervention efforts and theoretically relevant information concerning linkages among adolescent risk behaviors. Research Associate at the Brock Research Institute for Youth Studies at Brock University, Ontario, Canada. He received his M.A. in Clinical Psychology from the University of North Dakota. His major research interests are adolescent risk behavior involvement and youth activity involvement as a context for positive development. Professor in the Department of Child and Youth Studies at Brock University, Ontario, Canada. She received her Ph.D. in Developmental Psychology from the University of Waterloo. Her major research interests include adolescent risk taking and resilience, including academic underachievement and media/technology influences on lifestyle choices and learning. Assistant Professor in the Department of Child and Youth Studies at Brock University, Ontario, Canada. She received her Ph.D. in Developmental Psychology from Brock University. Her major research interests are adolescent risk-behavior involvement, particularly related to gambling, and risk and resilience.