利益相关者理论视角下的高职院校治理主体研究

高等职业院校是典型的利益相关者组织,要明确自身的发展战略目标,重点是对各方面的利益相关者进行发现和整体评估,构建学校和利益相关者之间的合作伙伴关系,并最终保障高职院校社会责任的有效实现。     

Beyond griefing: Virtual crime

Because there is so much money involved in virtual worlds these days, there has been an increase in criminal activity in these worlds as well. The gaming community calls people who promote conflict “griefers”. Griefers are people who like nothing better than to kill team-mates or obstruct the game’s objectives. Griefers scam, cheat and abuse. Recently, they have begun to set up Ponzi schemes. In games that attempt to encourage complex and enduring interactions among thousands of players, “griefing” has evolved from being an isolated nuisance to a social disease. Much in the same way crime has become the real world’s social disease. Grief is turning into crime.     

市场中介组织经济法主体地位的定性分析

本文通过对传统经济法主体概念与分类的阐述,明确了传统概念中存在的问题,从市场中介组织作为经济法主体的必要性角度去证成它的主体地位。     

论辩护律师在刑事诉讼中的主体地位

我国刑事诉讼法学界关于辩护律师在刑事诉讼中地位属非诉讼主体地位等观点存在明显的理论上的缺陷。辩护律师在现代刑事诉讼中具有诉讼主体地位是由辩护律师的辩护职能、控辩平衡等因素所决定的。     

虚拟社会对现实社会治安的影响及管理对策研究

虚拟社会违法犯罪案件逐年增多,对虚拟社会治安问题进行综合整治已成为公安机关面临的一项重要任务。加强虚拟社会治安管理的对策主要有:健全法律法规法;建立一支不受地域管辖限制的网上专门警察执法力量;提高网络监测技术手段;将虚拟社会治安管控纳入"三基"工程建设等。     

《香港医院管理局条例》的法学解读

本文以民法学民事主体理论为视角,对《香港医院管理局条例》中关于医院管理局的设立、法律属性及其职能、治理结构、运行机制等进行分析,并据此对我国办医主体设置、公立医院治理结构改革提出建议。     

贸仲委上海、华南两分会与贸仲委之争的法律问题研究(二)——贸仲委修订实施其2012规则合法正当有效

制定修订贸仲委仲裁规则的主体,无论仲裁法实施前依中央人民政府政务院1954年《决定》和国务院1988年《批复》还是实施后依其第73条规定均是中国贸促会(中国国际商会);贸仲委委员会议不是修订规则主体只是履行审议通过规则修订草案的程序;贸仲委历届章程均未规定审议通过规则修订草案的具体方式或应进行决议;贸仲委2012规则(简称12规则)修订草案无论以何方式经委员会议审议通过后提交中国贸促会(中国国际商会)批准实施均符合法律及章程规定,不存在规则修订草案审议通过程序违法;12规则取消"大条款"〔1〕择地仲裁规定真正实现了当事人意思自治,不存在实体违法;贸仲委上海、华南两分会拒不适用12规则,违反当事人签署两分会仲裁条款真实意愿,无权受理所涉案件。     

The Politics of the Third Person

Abstract

Against the enthusiasm for dialogue and deliberation in recent democratic theory, the Italian philosopher Roberto Esposito and French philosopher Jacques Rancière construct their political philosophies around the nondialogical figure of the third person. The strikingly different deployments of the figure of the third person offered by Esposito and Rancière present a crystallization of their respective approaches to political philosophy. In this essay, the divergent analyses of the third person offered by these two thinkers are considered in terms of the critical strategies they employ. Contrasting Esposito’s strategy of “ethical dissensus” with Rancière’s strategy of “aesthetic dissensus,” it is argued that Esposito’s attempts to recruit the figure of the third person to dismantle the dispositif of the person are politically (if not philosophically) problematic, while Rancière’s alternative account of the third person is more promising for political theory and practice.     

Alain Badiou's Politics and the Problem of Social History

Abstract

This paper explores the plausibility of Alain Badiou's ahistorical theory of politics. By insisting that the events of egalitarian politics are radically subtracted from social and historical conditions Badiou imagines a form of political action that effectively comes out of nothing. However, in order to establish the very prospect of an event's occurrence Badiou is forced to ground the possibility of political intervention in his theory of "evental recurrence", which effectively enables the subjects of political action to draw on the consequences of a preceding event in order to act in the here and now. The paper argues that by introducing the social dimensions of evental recurrence it is possible to construct an alternative account of political action that resolves a number of inconsistencies in Badiou's otherwise miraculous vision of politics. Consequently, rather than a militant activist that comes out of nowhere, evental recurrence implies that the militants of political action are saturated in their immediate social and political circumstances and in the memory of past struggles.     

法人精神损害赔偿的正当性

法人精神损害赔偿当取决于民法原则、目的和司法问题之解决,而不仅由单纯的一般概念和法学概念推导决定。民法理论上,民事主体拟制属性和民法公平原则与目的均支持法人精神损害赔偿;司法实践中,填平补偿法人非财产损害、对法人非财产损害引起的大规模自然人精神损害的补偿都急需法人精神损害赔偿之确定。