刍议治安秩序维护

治安秩序是治安学的核心内容之一,探讨治安秩序维护的过程、原则及规律,有助于解决治安实践和理论研究的混杂问题.治安秩序维护的过程可以分为治安预防、治安控制、治安处置和治安重建四个过程.治安秩序维护的过程中要坚持治安秩序维护一致性、规范性及适度性原则.治安秩序维护是治安三要素相互作用的过程,是治安需求和治安供给的平衡的体现,是循环往复的动态过程.     

市场、激励机制及公司治理结构

本文从委托代理制的天然风险出发 ,将公司治理结构置于市场中来认识 ,提出由完善市场来解决公司治理结构面临的委托代理风险问题。并用此观点分析了对我国国有企业治理结构进行规范的必要性以及进一步地改革意见。     

刑事附带民事诉讼中精神损害赔偿的依据及原则

确立刑事附带民事诉讼中精神赔偿的法律依据是刑诉法解释第 10 0条的规定。其理论依据 :一是我国对于精神赔偿采用的是立法非限定主义 ;二是附带民事诉讼的实质是民事诉讼。刑事附带民事诉讼中精神赔偿的原则以“根据情况 ,酌情赔偿”为宜。     

2000年依法治军理论与实践学术研讨会综述

研讨会的观点集中体现为毛泽东、邓小平、江泽民三代领导核心关于依法治军的理论与实践,具有时代的先进性、历史的继承性和发展的阶段性;关于依法治军的理论问题,必须弄清依法治军的基本概念和内涵、功能和理念、目标和重点等;依法治军的实践涉及国防和军队建设的方方面面,要着力解决依法管理、依法做好军队思想政治工作、依法维护国家军事利益和官兵的合法权益、建立严格有效的监督机制、开展法制教育、培养依法治军人才等方面的问题;对于我国古代及西方发达国家在"依法治军"中的先进的、有益的经验,我们应根据我军实情学习、借鉴之;我们还必须认真研究国际法,切实维护国家主权.     

Self-control, Victimization, and their Influence on Risky Lifestyles: A Longitudinal Analysis Using Panel Data

This research expands past investigations into the influence of low self-control as a risk factor for criminal victimization. Specifically, we consider two questions: (1) whether low self-control at one point in time can predict future victimization, and (2) whether victims alter lifestyle choices (like their own delinquency and contact with delinquent peers) in response to their earlier victimization. We answered these questions using three waves of adolescent panel data from the evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training program. Our results support the predictions of self-control theory, showing that low self-control measured at an earlier time is associated with later victimization, even after controlling for past victimization, delinquency, social bonds, and delinquent peer contact. Likewise, self-control appears to influence the relationship between earlier victimization and later lifestyles.

葡萄牙行政行为法律制度之评介

葡萄牙1996年<行政程序法>对行政行为进行了详细规定,分为"行政行为的有效"、"行政行为的效力"、"行政行为非有效性"、"行政行为的废止"和"行政行为的执行"五个部分.其在形式与内容上皆较为科学与完备,对我国制定行政程序法典的行政行为部分或单行行政行为法颇具借鉴意义.     

手机短信侵权民事责任探析

手机短信侵权是指短信发送行为人由于过错侵害了他人的财产权和人身权。结合我国《民法通则》第106、134条和其他相应法律法规的法律原则,运用侵权行为法的一般理论对手机短信侵权的构成要件、责任主体和归责问题进行分析,并从有法可依、有法必依的角度提出建立手机短信侵权规制制度的框架性构想。     

习惯法/民间法研究范式的批判性理解——兼论社会控制概念在法学研究中的运用可能

概念是进行科学研究的基本分析工具,同时具有促进和制约研究的辩证属性,因此需要对概念进行反思。“习惯法”、“民间法”这两个概念对于挑战和批判“法律中心主义”具有重要学术贡献。但是“习惯法”、“民间法”概念定义过于宽泛,使其作为一种研究范式不能很好地对不同性质和不同运作方式的规范进行必要的区分,从而导致这种研究范式具有局限性。在法学研究中,可以尝试用“社会控制”概念来弥补习惯法/民间法研究范式的不足。     

Improving the evaluation of anticrime programs: There’s work to be done

The summary version of the National Research Council’s report, Improving the Evaluation of Anticrime Programs, published in the Journal of Experimental Criminology, was accompanied by eight commentaries from distinguished criminology researchers. This paper responds to those thoughtful and provocative commentaries by further discussing the two broad questions that they raised: What anticrime programs should be evaluated and what methods should be used to evaluate them. The main themes of this response are that (a) evaluation is needed for the programs, practices, and policies in actual use, not only those developed by criminologists; (b) programs developed and tested by criminologists are more likely to be used if they build on existing programs and give as much attention to “implementability” as to theory; and (c) evaluation of practices, policies, and area-wide programs will be limited unless credible applications of observational and quasi-experimental methods can be developed.

Bringing Political Science to Bear on Tropical Conservation

With the renewed international emphasis on governance for sustainable development, political scientists wishing to have an impact on global environmental problems will find significant opportunities to collaborate with practitioners. These collaborations can be very rewarding, but academics should enter them with their eyes open to the associated challenges. Bridging the worlds of research and practice entails tensions between what is true according to the research, and what is possible given the constraints of specific organizations; between the problems that practitioners need solved and the puzzles that researchers find appealing; and, importantly, between the divergent cultures that shape the expectations and incentives of academics and their counterparts.