Introduction to Neumann: law and socialist political theory

Abstract

Regulators attempt to understand financial markets and their risks in terms of categories of knowledge and datasets that are defined and produced by the markets. However, regulators cannot adequately interpret or utilize such knowledge, for reasons including their social distance from the sites of knowledge production, the diversity of financial firms’ proprietary risk models, firms’ abilities to game the rules thus rendering the ‘metrics’ meaningless and several backfiring aspects of global regulatory networking and reform. Calls for yet more information about trading, posed in terms of the merits of transparency, result in information swamping of regulators. Meanwhile, while policy-makers tinker with regulatory structures (‘architecture’), political reaction to the crisis de-legitimizes public regulation as a project. Yet there is one positive aspect of the reforms – enhancing powers for ‘resolution’ of financial firms in ways that impact upon investors while minimizing wider destabilization – upon which the regulatory information requirement can and should be refocused. To protect the public interest, legal transparency is required, trading transparency is not. This paper introduces these issues by drawing on critical work on transparency and markets.     

Solar Trade War Ⅱ

正With another wave of trade rows approaching,what’s the way out for Chinese solar makers?It seems Chinese solar exporters have hardly any time to catch a breath.Just when they think their business is going to bottom out following the settlement of a one-year trade dispute with their biggest export destination—the EU,yet another storm cloud is quietly gathering on the horizon.     

论未成年人犯罪的社会调查之争——以社会调查主体之争为切入点

对未成年犯罪个案开展社会调查成为刑事诉讼法所规定的法定少年司法制度,有力地推动了我国少年司法的发展。但刑事诉讼法修改时,对社会调查的原则化规制以及指导司法实践的具体配套规范的缺失,共同导致这一制度在施行过程中出现了调查主体之争的白热化。实际上,调查主体之争的背后是司法权力配置之争。要化解权力配置之争及其引发的后续问题,必须从厘清主体之争的现实和理论成因着手,跨越社会调查活动开展的前置性障碍,建立起社会调查必要性评估机制,以共享和制约为权力分享的前提,合理权衡公检法三机关的司法权力配置之需,结合各地的司法实践需要和司法资源优势,建构起相对统一规范的社会调查主体机制。     

纠纷解决的社会结构与调解——基于剑河县林权纠纷的调解实践

文章借助美国学者布莱克的案件社会结构理论,侧重于从微观社会学角度分析调解所处的纠纷解决社会结构,通过对当地最为典型的林权纠纷各类型的性质、起因及结构要素不同组合方式进行剖析,展示出纠纷解决的社会结构对调解运行的深刻影响:纠纷当事人之间目前的熟识或面熟关系使纠纷趋于依据大量民风、民俗和伦理道德等地方性知识,运用调解方式解决;纠纷双方当事人之间的经济、社会、文化等方面的常规资本和个人性格、气质等非常规资本的分布、组合状况有力地制约着调解结果;一方或双方的支持者常常在调解中起着重要作用,有时会改变调解的走向,甚至决定着调解的成败。     

Drifting between accommodation and repression: explaining Indonesia's policies toward its separatists

A central government facing separatist activities adopts various policies to respond to them. In some cases, the government represses them harshly, while in other cases, it tries to accommodate the separatists’ demands. We currently have two strands in the literature to understand which policies are implemented by the government: the reputation theory and the cost-benefit calculation model. However, neither of them is sufficient to explain Indonesia's policies toward its separatists in Aceh and Papua following democratization. Indonesia's policies toward separatists have been drifting between accommodation and repression. To understand these policy shifts, this paper emphasizes the importance of the inner workings of the central government, introducing two variables: the preferences of national leaders and the existence of veto players. This paper demonstrates that these perspectives are essential in order to fully explain the Indonesian government's policies toward its separatists.     

浅谈劳动争议与人事争议的合理界分

人事关系与劳动关系作为两种不同的人力资源配置模式,在我国经济体制改革和政治体制改革的过程中不断的演进,造成理论和实践中的模糊和混乱。鉴于劳动关系与人事关系、劳动争议与人事争议存在较明显的差异,有必要对其进行合理界分。人事争议与劳动争议合理界分的标准是争议是否具有公法属性。根据这一标准对我国实践中混乱的人事关系进行审视,人事关系应该表述为国家机关(包括参照《公务员法》执行的人民团体和社会团体)、具有公共服务职能的事业单位与其具有公职身份的工作人员的劳动力使用关系。     

试论邓小平科学决策的几个特征

邓小平以一个无产阶级革命家的胆略,在其一生做出了一系列扭转中国历史乾坤的科学决策,求实性、果断性、创新性是其几个重要特征.这些决策对于中国社会主义现代化建设有极其重要的意义.     

由客体到主体:民初女性婚姻权利的变化——以大理院婚约判解为例

在传统的婚姻制度与习俗中,女性并非婚姻的主体,在婚约定立中,她们处于被安排的地位,在婚约履行中,她们是被强迫履行婚约义务的客体,在婚约的解除中,也是被双方父母争议的标的物,这种状况直到民国初年的民事基本法仍然没有任何改变。但民国初年的大理院因受西方民法理念及国内妇女运动的影响,通过一系列判解对《现行律民事有效部分》的相关规定进行了一定的变通,这种变通使民初女性的婚姻权利体现出由客体而主体的变化趋势。     

刑事二审案件审查范围的类型化构建

二审法官对刑事上诉案件进行全面审查既不符合诉讼经济要求,也不利于二审程序功能的实现,同时还有碍正义的伸张。将上诉案件区分为事实争议、法律适用错误、程序违法、量刑不当四种类型,并进行分类管理是我国刑事二审程序改革的有效举措。     

WTO争端解决机制中报复措施的缺陷及革新路径探析

世界贸易组织(以下简称WTO)争端解决机制中的报复措施被认为是解决成员方之间贸易争端的最后手段。尽管它比GATT相关规定有了不少改进之处,但其文本规定上的不足和本身所固有的功能性缺陷仍使得它备受批评和争议。国内外学界对此提出了各种改进建议,有必要对这些建议的合理性和可行性进行深入分析,在此基础上,结合我国的国情探讨我国应持有的立场和对策。