法医DNA标准物质备选细胞STR等位基因片段长度的定值

目的 研究建立法医DNA标准物质备选细胞基因组STR基因座等位基因片段长度标准定值的方法.方法 利用有机法提取HPF和HSSM细胞基因组DNA并进行STR复合扩增,将产物进行电泳检测.利用Gene Mapper软件分析电泳结果,记录STR基因座等位基因的数值,并对目前我国公安系统应用较为广泛的DNATyperTM15、IdentifilerTM两种试剂盒扩增产物进行相应的DNA片段长度(bp)统计以及定值.结果 HPF为男性个体细胞,HSSM为女性个体细胞.HPF和HSSM细胞DNATyperTM15系统等位基因片段长度范围分别为126.26±0.05～367.53±0.20bp和125.33±0.07～370.08±0.17bp,IdentifilerTM系统等位基因片段长度范围分别为117.22±0.04～340.02±0.08bp和117.21±0.03～323.86±0.09bp.结论 对STR基因座等位基因片段长度进行标准定值,可为法医DNA标准物质提供有效的溯源途径.     

Confidence in an election authority and satisfaction with democracy: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of a failed election in Sweden

Contemporary research on electoral integrity has focused on the functioning, evaluation, and legitimacy of electoral processes in emerging democracies. By contrast, this study investigates whether a failed election in a well-established democracy can affect individuals' evaluations of the electoral management body, the Election Authority, and whether those evaluations affect satisfaction with democracy. Using the case of a Swedish regional election in 2010 that had to be rerun due to procedural mistakes in the vote handling, we found that, in the short term, individuals’ confidence in the Election Authority was reduced after it was announced that the election had to be rerun because of the mistakes. Subsequently, this decreased confidence was strongly associated with less satisfaction with democracy at the regional and national level. As good news for the authority, after a successful rerun election, confidence rebounded to the levels prior to the failed election.     

Robots,standards and the law: Rivalries between private standards and public policymaking for robot governance

This article explains the complex intertwinement between public and private regulators in the case of robot technology. Public policymaking ensures broad multi-stakeholder protected scope, but its abstractness often fails in intelligibility and applicability. Private standards, on the contrary, are more concrete and applicable, but most of the times they are voluntary and reflect industry interests. The ‘better regulation’ approach of the EU may increase the use of evidence to inform policy and lawmaking, and the involvement of different stakeholders. Current hard-lawmaking instruments do not appear to take advantage of the knowledge produced by standard-based regulations, virtually wasting their potential benefits. This fact affects the legal certainty with regards to a fast-paced changing environment like robotics. In this paper, we investigate the challenges of overlapping public/private regulatory initiatives that govern robot technologies in general, and in the concrete of healthcare robot technologies. We wonder until what extent robotics should be governed only by standards. We also reflect on how public policymaking could increase their technical understanding of robot technology to devise an applicable and comprehensive framework for this technology. In this respect, we propose different ways to integrate the technical know-how into policymaking (e.g., collecting the data/knowledge generated from the impact assessments in shared data repositories, and using it for evidence-based policies) and to strengthen the legitimacy of standards.     

Are Public-Led Arts Incubating Programs a Double-Edged Sword? A Case Study of the Arts Council Korea’s Performing Arts Grant Program

A nation’s cultural policy is derived from its political and governance history, and its past practices. Taking the genealogical traits of South Korean cultural policies into account, the authors examine the contributions and risks of a public-led arts incubator program. One of the Arts Council Korea’s grant programs in the arts-incubating structure was involved with a public funding scandal of political intervention during the grant review process. Consequently, questions were raised about the current bureaucratic system for cultural policy. This article discusses the legitimacy of state intervention in the arts, and analyzes the case with relevant collected documents and interviews.     

"纵横统一论"科学价值之理性反思

经济法是20世纪法律体系适应社会本位思潮的一大创新.然而,经济法从其诞生之日起便颇受争议,不仅受到相邻法律部门的猛烈攻击,其学科内部也是学说纷纭.其中,发端于前苏联,以B·B·拉普捷夫为代表的"纵横统一论"经济法理论影响最大,所受争议也最多,甚至被全盘否定.本文从介绍"纵横统一论"入手,力图揭示"纵横统一论"之科学内涵,并对其理论和实践价值予以重新定位,以期推动我国经济法学科建设,促进我国经济发展.     

The Quango Conundrum

Quangos (or more accurately, arm's length bodies) are the subject of repeated culls by incoming governments, yet individually are seen as useful devices to reassure the public and give confidence in the performance of public functions. We argue that the confused landscape and poor governance has contributed to the view that, as a class, ALBs are inefficient and unaccountable. The government needs to take the opportunity of its review to rationalise the complex landscape of ALBs, and put governance on a more robust long‐term footing based on the degree of freedom an ALB needs to command public confidence.     

Myocardial Bridging: A Meta‐Analysis of Prevalence

The main objective of this article was to analyze prevalence data about myocardial bridging (MB) in published studies. To this purpose, we performed a meta‐analysis of studies published in English literature that contained data about the prevalence of MB and its anatomical characteristics. The overall prevalence was 19% (CI: 17–21%); autopsy studies revealed an overall prevalence of 42% (CI: 30–55%), CT studies 22% (CI: 18–25%), and coronary angiography 6% (CI: 5–8%). Most bridges were located on the left anterior descending artery (82% overall, 63% on autopsy studies), had a mean thickness of 2.47 mm and a mean length of 19.3 mm. In conclusion, autopsy studies should be the gold standard in evaluating the actual prevalence of myocardial bridges, while in vivo high‐resolution CT scanning should be preferred to coronary angiography studies.     

应用Pixel法测量平面内非直线长度的法医学研究

目的探寻一种法医鉴定工作中测量平面内非直线长度的方法。方法精确切断长度不同的10根焊接锡丝并读出结果作为对照组(钢尺直接读取法),再分别将这10根长度不同的焊接锡丝任意弯曲,然后用本文研究的方法计算出长度作为Pixel组,并对两组数据进行统计学分析。结果 Pixel方法得出的结果与钢尺读取法直接读出的结果之间的差异不具有统计学意义。结论 Pixel法在测量平面内非直线长度(如瘢痕、创口)上比传统的棉线法有明显优势,计算出来的长度更精确、易操作,使法医学鉴定结论更准确、有说服力,也更能适应诉讼要求,在法医学鉴定中有很好的应用前景。     

Stature Estimation from Various Foot Dimensions Among Slovak Population

The foot measurements are important in forensic field as they can be used as body height predictors for an individual. The morphology of human feet shows the variations and therefore the aim of this study was to find the relation between stature and foot measurements and to generate population‐specific equations. We measured the stature and bilateral foot measurements of 71 volunteers ranging in age between 18 and 27 years using standard measurements technique. The results revealed nonsignificant bilateral differences in all sex groups (p < 0.05). Sex differences were found to be significant in all foot measurements (p < 0.001). The highest significant and positive correlation coefficients with stature were observed for foot length in males (r = 0.759), in females (r = 0.722), and in the sex‐mixed group (r = 0.865). According to the nonsignificant sex effects on the relation between stature and foot dimensions, the regression equations were computed only for the pooled mixed‐sex group. Our study provides equations that can help to estimate stature from foot measurements among Slovaks.