FITTING THE FORUM TO THE FAMILY FUSS

This article analyzes advantages and disadvantages of mediation, collaborative law, and cooperative law based on the parties' capabilities, attitudes about professional services, and assessments of and preferences about the risks of various procedures. Each of these procedures has virtues and there is great value in providing clients and practitioners with a choice of procedures. Under collaborative and cooperative law, lawyers and clients agree to focus exclusively on negotiation from the outset the case, typically using a problem-solving process. Collaborative law involves a written "disqualification agreement" between all the parties and their lawyers under which lawyers are disqualified from representing parties in litigation if either party chooses to litigate. Cooperative law is similar but does not use the disqualification agreement. Because most communities do not have lawyers offering cooperative law, collaborative law groups should encourage at least some of their members to offer clients the option of cooperative law.     

When random assignment fails: Some lessons from the Minneapolis Spouse Abuse Experiment

In this paper, we consider what may be done when researchers anticipate that in the implementation of field experiments, random assignment to experimental and control groups is likely to be flawed. We then reanalyze data from the Minneapolis Spouse Abuse Experiment in a manner that explicitly models violations of random assignment. As anticipated, we find far larger treatment effects than previously reported. The techniques developed should be useful in a wide variety of settings when random assignment is implemented imperfectly.     

浅论审判独立的内部保障

法官之间的独立 ,即法官在审案时不受参与审判或没有参与审判的法官的影响 ,是法官独立的应有之意。为此 ,应该改革法官的遴选与提名制度 ,取消法官的等级制度和考核制度。     

中外合作办学思想政治教育工作路径选择与思考

中外合作办学作为新时期高校加强开放办学、国际交流与合作的重要窗口,应切实把创新学生教育管理模式作为推动大学生思想政治教育工作的内生动力。以山东农业大学中外合作办学为例,为创新中外合作办学思想政治教育工作作了积极实践与路径探索。     

Explaining preferences for redistribution: A unified framework to account for institutional approaches and economic self‐interest for the case of monetary transfers for families and children

Explanations of different patterns of preferences for redistribution either highlight the role of the institutional framework in a country or highlight the importance of self‐interest and rational expectations. The study introduces a unified approach to explain differences in preferences for redistributive measures for the case of intergenerational monetary transfers for families and children. Both explanatory approaches are integrated into the action‐based Model of Frame Selection that incorporates normative motives and economic self‐interest into the process of decision making. Using a large sample that deals with questions on the approval of public policies for families and accounts for the normative importance of children and family life in Germany, evidence is provided that both approaches are valid in explaining preferences for government transfers.     

中国经济发展路径战略抉择——基于浙江、江苏、广东和重庆四地发展经验的比较研究

任何一个地区或国家的经济社会发展都必须选择适合自身发展的经济模式。在经济转型时期,我国各地通过长期经济实践,逐渐形成了苏南模式、浙江模式、广东模式和重庆模式。这些模式在经济社会发展过程中相互竞争、相互借鉴、相互融合,正在生成一种新的经济发展模式。由于我国地域广袤,各地自然和人文环境差异较大,新的发展模式必须以科学发展观为指导,将经济发展的普遍性与各地的特殊性结合起来,探索出一种因地制宜、行之有效的科学经济发展模式,实现国有与民营、基础与创新、计划与市场、强国与富民的有机结合,促进经济科学发展,实现社会和谐稳定。     

我国能动司法若干问题的思考

在当今中国实行能动司法,面临着司法能动与司法克制两种不同司法理念的争论,这场争论直接关系到我国司法体制改革与司法制度建设的历史进程。历史要求我们在中国司法语境下,从法学理论与法律实践的结合上,客观分析能动司法的比较优势,科学做出能动司法的模式选择,深入研究适度能动司法的价值取向。在此基础上,积极探寻我国能动司法的合理途径和科学方式。     

读"上博简"札记

<上海博物馆藏战国楚竹书>(一)出版以后,引起了学者的广泛注意,"竹书"命名问题、"孔子诗论"的作者问题、"留白"问题是大家关注的热点.笔者对这些问题的研究进行了全面的梳理,并提出自己的观点.另外,该文还讨论了利用古音学考释古文字应该注意的问题.