关于刑事附带民事诉讼的合理性探讨

刑事附带民事诉讼对于提高诉讼效率,防止矛盾判决具有十分重大的意义。由于两种诉讼性质上的差异以及立法上的 不完善,使我国的刑附民程序在设计上有诸多不合理之处,应将民事诉讼从刑事诉讼中分离出去,归并到民事诉讼中,保证性质不同 的诉讼按照自身的规律来进行。     

论超越了协作体系的合作体系

在工业社会,适应社会分工以及市场经济的需要,人类建构起了一个协作体系.协作体系反映了工业社会的生产关系,也是社会的基本结构,它为人类工业社会一切社会活动提供了空间,孕育了伟大的工业文明.但是,到了20世纪后期,人类开始了后工业化的进程,各种各样的危机事件,特别是2008年开始的经济危机,都意味着人类正在经历伟大的历史转型期的阵痛,也意味着人类必须超越工业社会的协作体系,用一种合作体系取而代之.官僚制组织是协作体系的典型表现,而属于合作体系的组织形态应当是合作制组织.对合作制组织的研究对于寻找一种适应后工业社会要求的组织形态具有重要意义.     

从形式价值的角度看审判的合理性

西方学者威廉姆.露西教授认为:作为作出判决过程的审判首先应当是一个“合理的过程,”即审判应具有合理性、满足合理性条件。同时,审判作为能够引发国家强制力释放的行为必然应具有合法性。审判是法的实现的一个环节和独立的过程的前提,审判的作出具有理由;理由的归类即具有“真理由;”通过理由的衡量找出“不容辩驳”的理由。作为“合理的过程”的审判之“合理”体现在简单案件和复杂案件的审判中。     

论法律形式合理性的十个问题

法律制度的理性化表现在两个方面,一为实质合理化,一为形式合理化。法治原则在司法领域必然意味着形式合理性的优先,即,在司法过程中,当个案处理结果的实质合理性与法律本身的形式合理性可以两全时,司法者应当而且必须兼顾这两种价值,在司法裁判中同时实现个案中的实质合理性与法律的形式合理性;然而,当实质合理性与形式合理性发生不可两全的矛盾而不得不有所牺牲时,司法裁判则应当以优先实现形式合理性为原则,以牺牲形式合理性为例外。无论是对于持有社会本位价值观念的人们而言,还是对于持有个人本位价值观念的人们而言,只要他们遵循理性的指引来选择达成目的的手段,以优先实现形式合理性为原则、以牺牲形式合理性为例外的司法公正,都是唯一合理的选项。     

试论行政规范的合理性

满足合理性要求的行政规范有助于建立有效的利益调节机制。因为这样的行政规范能够在价值合理性的基础上实现工具合理性,即以相对较低成本谋求多数人利益需求。因此,必须预设行政规范目的是从“众意”中寻找“公意,”而且规范的内容是对经济和社会的适度干预,设计满足简单而公正的要求的具体程序制度,并建立对已经生效的行政规范的审查、监控机制,从而最大程度地使制定出来的行政规范具有合理性。     

Diffusion and adaptation: why even the Silicon Valley model is adapted as it diffuses to East Asia

Diffusion scholarship expects little adaptation of core elements of policy models. However, the empirical reality is different; diffusion of even highly regarded models, such as the Silicon Valley venture capital (VC) policy model, results in marked adaptation. This article demonstrates why the Silicon Valley VC model is necessarily adapted differently by policy-makers in the geographically, ethnically and economically proximate states of Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore. More specifically, these policy-makers' interventionist orientations, private sector financing preferences and international versus domestic firm promotion biases drive contextually rational – and unique – adaptations of the Silicon Valley VC policy model.     

Defence cooperation between Brazil and Namibia: Enduring ties across the South Atlantic

This article addresses the nature of transatlantic relations between Brazil and Namibia in the last two decades and argues that, in stark contrast with any other relationship regarding the African continent, Brazil's motivation in deepening ties with Namibia was largely built upon an extensive military-to-military cooperation partnership. By focusing on long-standing bureaucratic interests, the article demonstrates how Brazilian–Namibian relations were driven over the years by strategic affinities, business opportunities made available by the security sectors of both countries and, more recently, growing concerns over the sovereignty of their respective maritime areas in tandem with renewed interest for security developments within the the South Atlantic region.     

中国司法与民意的沟通——基于主体间交往理性的认知

考察中国传统司法活动特质、民主革命时期司法活动特质、西方司法活动特质,今日之中国司法仍然徘徊在情理与国法之间,面临着司法的六重困局,力求通过主体间交往理性的认知以寻求脱困之思路。在三元结构下,进一步追问谁之民意,调和非理性民意,如网络暴民民意、操纵民意、偏执民意以及变调民意(仇官、仇富、侠客等),通过主体间交往理性的认知,达到沟通民意与司法的效果。通过司法中民意表达的认知机制、方法和路径选择,达成国家司法话语权和民间司法话语权的交涉和沟通,实现由舆论法庭走向制度化表达。     

Bureaucratic Discretion and Political Control of the Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA)

Drawing on theories of political control and bureaucratic discretion this research examines two states' experiences with RCRA implementation and administration in the United States. This research finds that both bureaucratic actors and political actors shape the implementation of these environmental programs with money source and regional EPA offices playing a bigger role than expected.     

The Nouvelle Philosophie and Foucault

The first part of the paper gives an account of some of the intellectual and political background to the characteristic positions of the Nouvelle Philosophie, and details the presentation of these positions in the work of André Glucksmann. The important influence of Foucault on the Nouvelle Philosophie is then discussed. Foucault's interpretation of his own earlier work and his present manner of posing the question of power are critically analysed, and found to be defective in a way which allows room for the exploitation of his results by the Nouvelle Philosophie. This partial convergence is illustrated by a comparison between Lardreau and Jambet's L'Ange and Foucault's recent discussions of sexuality. The paper concludes with a brief location of the Nouvelle Philosophie in the context of intellectual developments outside France.