法律类道歉研究——以行政道歉为主线

行政道歉是指行政主体及其工作人员基于行政权的行使或者其他影响行政主体良好形象的违法或者不当行为而向社会公众或者特定行政相对人表达歉意的行政责任承担方式。行政道歉和国家道歉、司法道歉、刑事道歉、民事道歉共同作为法律类道歉,拥有非财产性、真诚性、规范性、主动性、补充性等共同的品质,都是独立的责任方式;但是彼此内涵不同,且涉及的法律关系、所处层次、致歉目的、致歉起因、致歉主体、致歉对象、致歉主体和致歉对象的关系以及体现的职责因素均不同。     

当事入主义教学法在《国际商法》课程中的运用

《国际商法》是经济管理、外贸英语类相关专业高等教育的主干课程。但该课程教学目前暴露出了许多问题，现有教学改革方案也不能完全有效解决其缺陷。为此，应当推广当事人主义教学法的运用。其运用的主要实现方略涵盖充分引导学生分析和自身最密切相关的国际商事法律规范、着力推动学生思考同自身密切相关的国际商事法律案例、时刻强调贯彻非法学专业的法律文化学教育和明确教学效果的考核四方面。     

论无独立请求权第三人制度的重构

随着社会主义市场经济体制在我国的逐步确立,以及公民主体意识的不断增强,各类民事纠纷大幅度增加,由此使得人民法院人少案多的矛盾渐趋突出。而根据自身特点,本应发挥更大作用以缓解上述矛盾的无独立请求权第三人制度,却反而暴露出其本身在法理基础、立法技术和司法实践中的诸多缺陷。对此,惟一的出路与选择便是对该制度进行完善,甚至是重构。通过深入研究该制度的立法体例和实践运行现状,进而剖析问题存在之根源,在辩证地梳理该制度价值取向和法理基础的前提下,提出综合改造构想。     

中国警察维权的发展演变及存在的问题

中国警察维权的发展演变情况，体现了各时期中国警察维权的内容和特点，也反映了警察维权的不足和困难。中国警察维权存在的问题，在立法和制度两方面的体现较为突出，也有各种干扰因素的影响。而警察维权的重点——袭警问题，以及警察维权的难点——解决警察维权所涉及的各方利益更是当前警察维权必须尽快解决的两大问题。     

刑事和解的立法依据——基于刑民界限之博弈信息论视角

刑事和解作为刑民界限之博弈产物,是立法机关在针对刑民关系的特点上,基于理性、偏好等信息进行合理决策后达致的纳什均衡.同时,刑事和解也具有检验纳什均衡的功能,并使得国家和个人均没有改变和偏离刑事和解的动机.博弈论的独特视角打破了传统刑民界限的僵硬隔离,为刑事和解立法策略的.正当性和合理性提供了积极的支持.     

“先行后知”训练法在警务技战术案例教学中的应用

体验式培训"先行后知"训练法有利于教师掌握教学进度,了解学生水平,提高教学的针对性;有利于课堂教学主体作用的发挥,提高学生学习的参与度;有利于学生模拟实战拓展思维,提高教学案例的鲜活性;有利于师生探究试错做到教学相长,提高技战术实战应用能力。技战术案例教学做好"先行后知"训练的组织和应用,要不断探索,并进行深入研究。     

案例教学是党校教学改革的成功之路--关于中共瓦房店市委党校案例教学的调查

案例教学法是运用案例进行教学并着眼于被教育者能力开发的一种新型教育培训方法体系.积极研究、探讨并坚定不移地实施案例教学法,极大地促进了党校教学理论与实践的结合,促进了教员与学员综合素质的提高,使党校教学焕发出新的生机和活力,走出了一条党校教学改革的成功之路.     

刑事犯罪信息的系统构成及其运用方式

在案件侦查中 ,刑事犯罪信息工作远远没有发挥出其实际应有的作用。究其原因 ,主要是没有将搜集到的各种犯罪信息做进一步的深加工 ,组织成一个层次分明、种类齐全、相互匹配的信息系统 ,没有以科学合理的方式加以有效利用。本文就刑事犯罪信息的系统构成和运用方式这两个方面加以探讨。     

Can Us-Type Court Management Approaches Work In Civil Law Systems? Experiences From The Balkans And Beyond

The benefit of applying modern management approaches to court operations to ensuring access to justice, timely and transparent dispositions, and increased public trust in courts is recognized in many countries. In the USA, the art of applying modern management techniques to court operations has evolved over the past 30 years into a now solidly established profession. Since the underlying principles and techniques of modern court management, such as case flow management, goal-oriented performance measures, workload assessments, customer surveys, etc., are derived from general management concepts they are not tied to a particular legal system or framework and can be successfully applied in non-US systems if they are properly adjusted. Interested in the positive results of court management in the USA, researchers and practitioners in several European countries have been looking at the applicability of the approaches used in the USA to improve their own ability to manage court processes more efficiently.Since court management has become a main staple of reforming court operations in the USA, it is not surprising that US-funded development assistance in the Balkan states and other countries often involves transferring court management US-style into the newly evolving democracies as part of rule of law or commercial sector development assistance. These projects frequently introduce, among others, case flow management techniques that sometimes seem to be in conflict with underlying legal principles or procedural laws, and often defy the local legal culture. The US-funded assistance programs are often introduced parallel to efforts funded by European and other donors, which may take and suggest different approaches to the host country. As a result, confusion and insecurity about which approaches are appropriate for a particular country can arise and impede much needed reforms or lead to legislative and regulatory changes that do not mesh well or even conflict with other parts of the legal framework.This article reviews the role of US-based court management approaches in recent court reform efforts under way in Serbia, Bosnia, and Croatia and, in light of lessons learned there and in other countries, assesses the reform processes applied and their status. It also outlines how these court management approaches fit into non-US court systems, how they can be adjusted according to individual country needs and what the main obstacles are that such reform efforts generally face.     

江村村民委员会选举个案研究

江村村民委员会选举经历了候选人从"内定"到推荐、从等额到差额的转变过程,是村民意愿与上级意图磨合的结果.村民参与选举的热情与他们的切身利益、他们真正当家作主的预期以及他们对村委会的依附程度有关.基层政府在选举中既起到了积极指导又起到了变相控制的双重作用.这一个案对我们完善有关法律制度提供了有益的启示:应从制度上进一步明确乡、村之间的关系,合理地划分乡镇政府与村委会的权限;应对村民代表会议的产生、权限及其运行加以规范化和细化;应将"无候选人的直接选举"合法化等等.