统一思想认识增强政治共识

本期省部级党外领导干部专题研究班,是在全国上下深入学习贯彻中共十七届五中全会精神、齐心协力开创科学发展新局面的大背景、大形势下举办的,也是贯彻落实中共中央颁发的<2010-2020年党外代表人士教育培训改革和发展纲要>的创新之举.研究班学员必须认真学习、深刻领会,准确把握中共十七届五中全会的精神实质;统一思想、深化认识,增强政治共识;履行职责、发挥优势,全面贯彻中共十七届五中全会精神.     

对话思维在刑事公案中的运用

一个正当的法律决定必须通过理性的协商、交流与对话制度才能形成，把法律意义上的真理与通过沟通形成的共识联系起来。立法过程、诉讼程序的设计体现了对话协商的思想。在刑事公案的审理中，刑法规范的选择适用以及判决书的论证也应该以对话思维方法为出发点，对各方观点包括民意进行辨析和鉴别，理性地吸收合理部分，使公案的判决达到合法性、合理性和可接受性的统一。对话思维的运用必须限制在刑法的框架内，就是说，对各方意见包括公众意见的吸收，都必须能够有相关的刑法规范作为依据。     

新形势下两岸关系和平发展的影响因素分析

2008年以来,在国共两党和两岸同胞的共同努力下,台湾局势发生了积极深刻变化,国民党在"立委"和台湾地区领导人选举中相继取得压倒性胜利,"台独"政权被终结,"法理台独"的现实威胁大大降低,两岸关系发展出现了难得的历史机遇。海峡两岸两会随即在"九二共识"的基础上恢复制度性协商,并在两岸包机、大陆居民赴台旅游等方面取得阶段性成果,两岸关系发展露出新的曙光。但两岸关系错综复杂,岛内民意发展尚存变数,加上美日等外部因素的影响,两岸关系取得重大改善仍需时日。因此,两岸执政当局和两岸同胞在坚持"九二共识"的基础上,建立互信、搁置争议,建立两岸制度性协商机制,深化两岸的经贸文化交流,以共同促进两岸关系和平稳定发展。     

APEC:Seeking Common Development of the Asia-Pacific

Propelled by APEC and newly bolstered bilateral and multilateral relations between China and the Asia-Pacii c region, economic and trade relations between China and other major APEC members have witnessed bounding development.     

民主党派在舆论宣传上应当秉持的基本观点——兼议参政党应当成为执政党的“智库”

任何政治党派都会把自己的核心价值观、党性原则、理论指导、行动准则,在舆论宣传中体现出来。中国特色的民主党派作为中国共产党领导的参政党,要做政治上的清醒者,秉持＂敢于为民发声、善于为党‘补天’＂的基本观点,在舆论宣传上应当始终坚持与共产党合拍,为实现＂中国梦＂,不断传递＂中国声音＂,成为执政党需要、人民群众期盼的高层次的＂智库＂。     

The Russian Orthodox Church as the Church of the Majority

The author examines the evolution of relations among Church, state, and society in Russia over recent years in the light of comparisons with other predominantly Orthodox Christian countries.     

哈贝马斯言语行为三重功能模式理论

哈贝马斯的社会批判理论通过言语行为的机制协调功能约束主体间的行为,从而实现从话语结构角度解释社会的目的,进而回答了社会秩序何以可能的经典之问。研究哈贝马斯言语行为三重功能模式理论,必须要思考三个问题:第一,是什么的问题,即哈贝马斯所主张的三重功能模式理论的具体内容是什么;第二,为什么是的问题,即为什么是言语行为使主体间达成共识,而不是权力、货币或其他相关媒介;第三,如何是的问题,即言语行为如何使主体间达成共识。     

Democratic reform between the extreme makeover and the reinvention of tradition: the case of the Netherlands

Democracy in the Netherlands, like in so many other Western countries, is under substantial reform pressure. The problem with the democratic system in the Netherlands, according to democratic reformers, is that it is out of step with the fast and major changes taking place in modern society. Champions of democratic reform in the Netherlands mostly look to sweeping, large-scale, and all-encompassing plans for democratic reform, achieving, however, little success. Major structural changes have been planned time and again, but eventually the institutional structure has remained largely the same. This article presents a critical analysis of the standard recipe that democratic reformers often prescribe – radical makeover – and outlines a viable alternative that can also be derived from the Dutch case – reinventing tradition. Reinventing tradition implies a mixture of change and preservation, of movement and counter-movement. It is, arguably, the only way for democratic reform to go, at least in a consensus democracy like the Netherlands. Dutch history demonstrates that large-scale blueprint reform runs a serious risk of non-implementation, and that small-scale adaptive tinkering, part of the incremental ‘reinvention of tradition’, can be significantly more successful as a reform strategy.     

Interorganisational Relations and Goal Consensus: An Exploratory Study in Two Local Dutch Service Delivery Networks

The present study explores how similarity in policy preferences within pairs of organisations in service delivery networks (that is, goal consensus) is related to existing bilateral interorganisational relations. We distinguish between different types of interorganisational relations and hypothesise that stronger relations are positively associated with goal consensus. A social network analysis is performed using data on 546 ties in two complete service delivery networks in a medium-sized city in the Netherlands. Results indicate that the strongest association is between goal consensus and types of interorganisational relations that imply more strategic information exchange between members of the organisations – especially managerial interaction.     

数字技术驱动社会治理共同体建构的逻辑机理与风险治理

数字技术如何影响社会治理过程并推动治理共同体构建是推进国家治理现代化中亟待解决的重要问题。数字技术的革新与发展为治理共同体的构建提供了权责对等、激励机制、共识机制与共享机制等关键要素。在与社会治理的深度互动与融合发展中,数字技术形成了赋能工具、治理机制、价值标准与治理手段等治理属性,能够拓展社会治理网络、整合与优化社会治理资源、重塑社会治理公共价值以及推动社会治理制度再生产。数字技术有望解决治理模式转型的稳定预期以及社会治理共同体持续发展的动力问题,但亦存在治理风险。国家要继续推动面向数字化的政府转型、构建面向数字化的规则体系、完善共建共治共享的社会治理制度,发挥数字技术更积极、更有效的治理动能。