行政处罚中“一事不再罚原则”研究

＂一事不再罚原则＂一直是行政法学界讨论的热点问题之一,我国法律并没有明确规定一事不再罚的具体含义,没有对＂一事＂和＂再罚＂的内涵做出明确的界定,在行政执法实践中存在着很多重复处罚、多头处罚的现象,严重侵害了行政相对人的合法权益,降低了行政机关在人民群众中的威信。,只有科学界定＂一事＂和＂再罚＂的内涵,加强立法,扩大一事不再罚的适用范围,对行政处罚法律法规竞合的处理规定,行政执法主体竞合的处理原则等内容做出明确的规定,才能真正解决实践中多头执法、重复处罚、执法扰民等问题,真正贯彻一事不再罚原则。     

以实现人的全面自由发展为神圣使命——中国共产党90年光辉历程

中国共产党建党90年来的历程,是以实现人的全面自由发展为神圣使命的历程.中国共产党一开始就以“为人类活动”为己任,明确在中国推进社会革命;中国共产党把马克思主义关于人的全面自由发展思想中国化,坚持人的解放应实现在具体的现实中而非抽象的形式上,从而建树起全心全意为人民服务的根本宗旨;新中国建国后,特别是改革开放进程中,中...     

道路交通事故损害赔偿责任归责原则研究

分析不同国家对交通事故损害赔偿责任的归责原则．认为对认定交通事故人身损害侵权责任应适用无过错责任归责原则,论述归责原则,能清晰地呈现无过错责任的法律真面目,更透彻地理解道路交通安全法的立法精神,在执法、司法、守法等方面能更好地贯彻落实无过错责任原则。     

论劳务派遣下同工同酬之完善

劳务派遣下被派遣劳动者与用工单位普通员工同工不同酬是我国现实生活中十分普遍的现象,其成因是多方面的.只有从同工同酬的界定开始,以劳务派遣的法律关系为基础,分析我国劳务派遣下同工不同酬的现象及成因并提出一些针对之策,才能对完善我国劳务派遣下同工同酬制度有所帮助.     

论德日犯罪论体系中的犯罪成立消极因素

德日三阶层的犯罪论体系是大陆法系犯罪论体系的典型代表,它由构成要件该当性、违法性和有责性组成,不但强调犯罪成立的积极因素,更强调犯罪成立的消极因素.德日犯罪论体系中犯罪成立消极因素主要有消极的构成要件要素、违法阻却事由、责任阻却事由.犯罪成立消极因素的存在使得犯罪论体系兼具了惩罚犯罪与保障人权的功能,同时也保障了被告人...     

罪刑法定视域下刑法解释的基本理论

刑法解释相对于其他法律解释研究更为艰难的原因在于受制于刑法罪刑法定基本原则的限制。成文法本身语词的模糊抽象、立法的局限以及刑法司法过程中法官理解阐释都是刑法解释正当性的依据。刑法条文是刑法解释的对象,对象特殊性决定了刑法解释论与刑法解释规则区别于其他法律文本解释的特殊性。刑法的形式解释论与实质解释论之争与法律解释中的主...     

柔性化处置群体性事件之机制设计

群体性事件是一种古老却依然炽热的社会现象。群体性事件的屡次爆发已凸显出在刚性体制内解决该问题的局限性。柔性化处置具有理论和现实的可行性。应该创新以人为本的政府管理模式,健全多渠道利益诉求表达机制,构建多元化纠纷解决机制,建立社会稳定风险防控和评估机制。还需坚持法治原则和慎用警力原则。     

文化养老研究的热点、趋势与展望——基于VOS viewer软件的知识图谱分析

本文基于中国知网(CNKI)检索2008-2020年259篇文化养老研究文献的题录数据,运用VOS viewer软件进行知识图谱分析以把握此问题研究热点、演进趋势并对未来发展予以展望.研究发现,十余年间,文化养老的关注对象集中于离退休老年人,供给主体侧重于老年大学、公共图书馆和社区.演进趋势包括两个方面:从发文量来看,...     

谈商务类专业学生求职的"板凳模式"

面向人力资源市场求职是获得工作岗位的重要手段,如果我们把求职比喻成一条板凳,那么,支撑这条板凳的"四条腿"分别是:求职者的素质、求职者的包装和技巧、求职机遇的发现和把握、求职者对人力资源市场的人才价值规律的认识,这就是求职的"板凳模式".熟悉和掌握求职的"板凳模式",有助于求职者更快、更好地找到一个满意的工作岗位.     

Globalization and citizenship: an Australian dilemma

Democratic citizenship, as it exists in countries like Australia, is premised on a nation-state that has sovereignty over a specific territory demarcated by internationally agreed boundaries. According to this model, citizens are supposed to control the state through democratic processes, and the state is supposed to control what happens on its territory and to decide who or what may cross its boundaries. But today globalization is eroding the capacity of the nation-state to control cross-border flows of finance, commodities, people, ideas and pollution. Powerful pressures are reducing state autonomy with regard to economic affairs, welfare rights and national culture. This leads to important questions: Does the quality of democratic citizenship remain unchanged? Are citizens still the source of political legitimacy? Do we need to rethink the meaning and mechanisms of citizenship to find new ways of maintaining popular sovereignty? How can citizens influence decisions made by global markets, transnational corporations and international organizations? These are problems that all democratic polities face, and Australia is no exception. Political and legal institutions derived from the Anglo-American democratic heritage have worked well for a century and more, but they may need to change significantly if they are to master the new realities. The central question in Castles's article is thus: What can we do to maintain and enhance democratic citizenship for Australians in the context of a globalizing world? To answer this question, he examines some of the inherent contradictions of nation-state citizenship, discusses the meaning of globalization and how it affects citizenship and looks at the effects of globalization and regional integration on Australia. He concludes that it is important to improve the quality of Australian citizenship by various measures: recognizing the special position of indigenous Australians and action to combat racism; combatting social exclusion; reforming the constitution to inscribe rights of active citizenship in a bill of rights; and reasserting the model of multicultural citizenship.