我国平台经济监管的理论逻辑与政策实践

理解我国平台经济监管政策和分析未来发展趋势，需要把握其内在的理论逻辑。研究认为，与 传统经济模式相比，平台经济的独特性使得原有监管制度面临巨大挑战，这是平台经济监管的经济逻辑。我国 进入构建新发展格局、努力实现经济社会高质量发展和全面提升政府治理能力的新阶段，完善平台经济监管也 有其制度逻辑。近年来我国在平台经济监管理念和政策措施创新方面都取得了积极进展，同时监管中也存在一 些亟待解决的问题。面向未来看，我国平台经济监管呈现出全链条化、法治化和常态化、多元主体协同、多种 技术手段支撑等发展趋势，加强以信用为基础的间接监管将成为我国构建长效化平台经济监管体系的重要任务。     

Creating resilience or private sector dependence? Shifting constructions of the farmer in Australian policy discourses

The Australian Government’s Agricultural Competitiveness White Paper aims to create a profitable and resilient Australian agriculture sector. In doing so, the White Paper emphasises farmers’ individual responses to the structural problems which have undermined farmers’ profitability, such as consolidated commodities markets. In particular, the White Paper recommends that farmers shape their farming practice to make their farms more attractive to private investors. This is presented as a normal response to farm profitability concerns. Farms are portrayed as investment targets and securing investment is framed as an essential skill of the modern farmer. To understand how this discursive construction has been made possible, this article develops a genealogical analysis of changing constructions of farmers, farming and of the role of the State. This research reveals the subtle discursive shifts which have helped shift responsibility for farming, from the State, to the self-reliant individual, and most recently, towards the private sector. Whereas the construct of the self-reliant, independent farmer has been used to facilitate deregulation of agricultural industries, this recent shift in power towards the private sector may potentially undermine farmers’ autonomy and increase dependence on private sector investment.     

隐名投资人股东资格认定问题研究

股东是公司关系中最为重要的角色,股东资格又是股东地位的法律基础。隐名投资争议中隐名投资人股东资格的认定遂成为理论及实务界的难题。为了给司法实践提供有效解决的路径,在已有理论研究的基础上展开讨论,从厘清基本概念出发,对争议进行类型化的处理,提出借用《合同法》的隐名代理制度和代理人身份不公开制度来解释隐名投资的内外关系,并结合案例分析,提出相应的解决办法。     

实名制下有偿代购火车票行为的法律性质分析——以10元“倒卖”火车票案为视角

倒卖车票、船票罪中倒卖行为的实质是具有投机性。火车票实名制度的出台有效限制了传统倒卖行为中对火车票的囤积，实名制下有偿代购火车票的行为不具有投机性，其本质应属于一般违法经营活动。从罪刑法定原则出发。其行为表现与侵害的法益不同于传统倒卖行为，不应认定为倒卖车票、船票罪；在利益衡量的角度，有偿代购火车票的行为也不宜认定为犯罪行为。为秩序与便利的平衡，应当对有偿代购行为进行合理规制。     

重评李渔“帮闲”说

新时期以来,人们对明末清初著名文学家李渔的评价已发生很大的变化.本文反思鲁迅先生之视李渔为“帮闲”此李渔研究中一个比较重要的学术命题,试图对李渔其人作出相对公允的评价.本文认为,李渔与那些以帮闲为职业的人并不相同,他的思想、个性等等其实有着诸多很不“帮闲”的地方；“帮闲”主要是李渔人生后期的社会形象.李渔之沦落为帮闲,主要归因于他竭力崇尚享乐、奉行趋时善变的市井实用主义人生哲学及由此形成的人格上的“无特操”.     

被遗忘的权利———社交网站引发的隐私权规制困境与对策研究

随着社交网络时代的到来,人们开始在现实世界里运用互联网、以数字化方式建立人际交往关系、表达和传递自己的个人信息.互联网这一“第四媒体”在生活中的悄然融入,虽然为人们提供了一个“共享信息、展示自我”的平台,但由此引发的隐私过度暴露问题却不容小觑.鉴于社交网站所引发的隐私争议,以语境完整性理论的视角分析争议背后的隐私风险与规制困境,在借鉴域外保护隐私权的成功经验基础上,探讨我国保护网络隐私权的有效机制,以期为网络隐私权保护的实践运作提供理论参考.     

金融消费者知情权保护的法经济分析

知情权是消费者权利体系的前提与基础,而金融消费的专业性及复杂性,使得金融消费者的信息弱势状态强于普通消费者.在我国,权利初始配置不合理、运行保障缺位等制度缺陷,导致金融机构侵权损害成本社会化.后金融危机时代,一个理想的出路应是倚重金融法治与金融监管,构筑有效的法律激励机制,以降低侵权损害成本.     

英国执行欧盟细胞指令的经验和启示简

英国为执行欧盟人体组织和细胞三个指令在立法和执法上所作的努力及其获得的成功,对于我国建立人体组织细胞法律制度,发展监管科学,有效治理“干细胞治疗”乱象,具有重要借鉴价值.在实证的基础上,分析、介绍英国人体组织法的基础、基本制度和运作方式,设想中国干细胞疗法监管科学的框架,应当包括监管的目标和长远战略、科学立法、制度文化、监管体制与执法机制、行业治理、患者维权的伦理—法律问题等.     

The post-Lisbon high representatives: an introduction

ABSTRACT

The Lisbon Treaty recently celebrated its 10th anniversary. The 2009 legal text was an attempt to enhance the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the EU’s action in an increasingly volatile world. And yet, the post-Lisbon time period has been characterised by multiple crises coming from the West, the East, the South, and even from within the EU. Against this backdrop, our Special Issue makes a systematic assessment of the EU's foreign policy post-Lisbon and of its evolution by focusing on the role of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR/VP). Assessing the post-Lisbon HR/VPs provides important insights on EU foreign policy processes over the past decade. In this introduction, we discuss the three research questions that guide our collection of articles, as well as our theoretical and empirical contribution to existing scholarly literature.     

Uber Über regulation? Regulatory change following the emergence of new technologies in the taxi market

Can emerging technologies transform not only markets, but also foster new regulatory change mechanisms? In the context of prevailing theories of regulatory change, this article explores the extent to which an interest‐based explanation can account for the regulatory responses toward emerging Transportation Network Companies (TNCs). Based on a primary cross‐city analysis of the 40 largest cities in the United States, the study found that although the existence of ex ante interest groups indeed somewhat limited the extent of ex post regulatory acceptance of TNCs, regulators seemed to prefer the newcomers over existing incumbents and approved TNCs in 77.5 percent of the examined cities, rarely pursuing harsh enforcement even when TNCs operated illegally. The research attempts to explain this intriguing phenomenon by extending the interest‐based approach to account for the key role played by “technological regulatory entrepreneurs.” The entrepreneurs bridged collective action barriers by becoming the central agent that managed, and reaped the benefits of, the collective action, by lowering the organizational costs and by disseminating information effectively and turning consumers into political campaigners, thus successfully promoting regulatory change.