主体间性：当前干部教育培训的新思路

主体间性是20世纪西方哲学中凸现的一个概念。在干部教育中引入＂主体间性＂这一方法原则,主张在教员和学员间建立主体间性的关系,目的是倡导用交往的精神来创新现代干部教育,使现代干部教育更科学、更具有人性化。根据主体间性教育的主体的交互性等特点,当前干部教育培训应从教育理念、教育方法、教育方式和教育内容等方面进行改革：在教育理念上,从单＂主体＂走向＂双主体＂;在教育方法上,从＂独白＂走向＂对话;在教育形式上,从＂一元型＂走向＂多元型＂;在教育内容上,从＂单一性＂走向＂丰富性＂。     

主体间性视野下的多媒体英语教学资源库的构建

在信息技术高速发展的大背景下，多媒体资源库和语料库构建的研究具有前所未有的重要性。近年来，主体间性哲学为理解教育、教育中的各个要素关系提供了新的视角。本文探讨了在主体间性视野中，多媒体资源库及语料库的构建过程中的各个自我主体和对象主体的界定；及各个主体间的关系特征。这对我国建设和谐社会的教育有一定的启示意义。     

Contemporary Psychoanalysis and Critical Theory: A New Synthesis

ABSTRACT

Critical Theory and contemporary psychoanalytic perspectives share many compatibilities in offering a constructive critique of society. Psychoanalysis teaches us that whatever values and ideals societies adopt, they are always mediated through unconscious psychic processes that condition the collective in both positive and negative ways, and in terms of relations of recognition and patterns of social justice. Contemporary critical theory may benefit from engaging post-classical and current trends in psychoanalytic thought that have direct bearing on the ways we conceive of and observe how individuals operate within social collectives. In particular, Axel Honneth relies on psychoanalytic sources that are dated. Critical theory would profit from engaging post-object relations schools such as self psychology, analytical psychology, psychoanalytic intersubjectivity theory, relationality, and contemporary attachment theory that are more nuanced yet can supplement Winnicottian perspectives. Implications for contemporary theory need to reflect upon how the psychosocial matrix of self and society both facilitate and hinder optimal social arrangements and fabrics of justice as it takes up the question of normativity. It is within this context that I hope to introduce contemporary psychoanalytic paradigms that move beyond classical models yet complement redirecting shifts in emphasis both psychoanalysis and Critical Theory attempt to accomplish. I suggest that an applied psychoanalytic explication on social phenomenology can expand the interpretive depth and breadth of human relations and open up a permissible space for interdisciplinary discourse. Here new vistas emerge for a proposed synthesis between the two schools of thought.     

The Classical Trinity and Kant's Aesthetic Formalism

Abstract

I identify two mutually exclusive notions of formalism in Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgement: a thin concept of aesthetic formalism and a thick concept of aesthetic formalism. Arguably there is textual support for both concepts in Kant's third critique. I offer interpretations of three key elements in the Critique of Aesthetic Judgement which support a thick formalism. The three key elements are: Harmony of the Faculties, Aesthetic Ideas and Sensus Communis. I interpret these concepts in relation to the conditions for theoretical Reason, the conditions for moral motivation and the conditions for intersubjectivity, respectively. I conclude that there is no support for a thin concept of aesthetic formalism when the key elements of Kant's Critique of Aesthetic Judgement are understood in the context of his broader critical aims.