全文获取类型
收费全文 | 461篇 |
免费 | 2篇 |
专业分类
各国政治 | 31篇 |
工人农民 | 11篇 |
世界政治 | 59篇 |
外交国际关系 | 40篇 |
法律 | 48篇 |
中国共产党 | 1篇 |
中国政治 | 3篇 |
政治理论 | 262篇 |
综合类 | 8篇 |
出版年
2024年 | 35篇 |
2023年 | 74篇 |
2022年 | 1篇 |
2021年 | 25篇 |
2020年 | 61篇 |
2019年 | 82篇 |
2018年 | 59篇 |
2017年 | 21篇 |
2016年 | 8篇 |
2015年 | 5篇 |
2014年 | 10篇 |
2013年 | 25篇 |
2012年 | 16篇 |
2011年 | 2篇 |
2010年 | 1篇 |
2009年 | 2篇 |
2008年 | 6篇 |
2007年 | 4篇 |
2006年 | 5篇 |
2005年 | 4篇 |
2004年 | 5篇 |
2003年 | 2篇 |
2002年 | 2篇 |
2001年 | 3篇 |
2000年 | 2篇 |
1999年 | 2篇 |
1997年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有463条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
131.
132.
Temirlan T. Moldogaziev Rachel M. Krause Gwen Arnold Le Ahn Nguyen Long Tatyana Ruseva Chris Silvia Christopher Witko 《政策研究评论》2023,40(2):186-206
Though many individuals are aware of the need to address environmental concerns, fewer are willing to pay for climate action or think the environment should be a priority for government spending. One compelling reason is that they prioritize using scarce resources to address immediate material concerns. This is particularly likely for individuals facing absolute material scarcity or for those who think they are relatively economically worse off, especially in contexts characterized by rapid transformation and volatility in the levels and quality of social welfare provision. To test these expectations, we analyze survey data from formerly Communist economies, which today find themselves with vastly different fortunes. Empirical findings suggest that absolute and relative material scarcity affect opinions regarding government spending on, and the willingness to pay more for, environmental action. However, willingness to pay more for government public services, inclusive of anti-poverty initiatives, has an impact on willingness to pay more for climate action, but in counter-intuitive ways. Overall, the results appear to suggest that explicitly addressing and relating individual living standards and inequality with environmental concerns may expand support for climate action. 相似文献
133.
134.
Street-level bureaucrats are often grassroots officials, and they are regarded as passive practitioners of policy with no authority to change policy or innovate, while policy entrepreneurs are usually high-level officials. Based on observations of China's responses to two national crises, this study found that the times do make a hero. When acting as innovative frontline technocrats, major transboundary crisis practitioners, and management savvy operators within the top-down bureaucracy, street-level bureaucrats can become policy entrepreneurs. To innovate and drive policy change, street-level policy entrepreneurs will adopt innovative strategies. They will make efficient use of their expertise and discretion, integrate various resources, strive for attention from superiors, consolidate their achievements, and expand their influence. 相似文献
135.
136.
This study compares the regulation of two emerging technologies, the CRISPR genome-editing system and Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAV) in the United States. The study draws on 33 in-depth interviews with innovation and governance experts to study the relationship between their regulatory environments and developing beliefs about these technologies. Using sociotechnical imaginaries as a framework, we explore how social actors envision technologically driven futures and the social order that enables them. These imaginaries are essential to emerging technologies, where experts build a framework of potentialities for innovation still underway. While scholarship has documented how sociotechnical imaginaries arise among policymakers, groups of scientists, state and local stakeholders, and public actors in different countries, less has been said about how regulatory organizations and their actors shape expectations around technologies that are in the early and middle stages of development. This article finds that regulatory institutions shape emerging imaginaries along three related axes: the distribution of authority, technological novelty, and risk. Interviewees negotiate these three contingencies differently based on relevant extant regulatory structures and ideologies, resulting in distinct imaginaries around each technology. CRISPR actors envision genome editing as largely diminishing biomedical harm and eventually suitable for health markets, while CAV actors diverge on whether self-driving cars alleviate or exacerbate risk and how they may enter roads. That organizational structures and practices of regulation inform broadly held sociotechnical imaginaries bears significance for studies of innovation trajectories, suggesting regulators can take an active role in shaping how risks and benefits of emerging technology are defined. 相似文献
137.
138.
Nora von Ingersleben-Seip 《政策研究评论》2023,40(5):781-810
Efforts to set standards for artificial intelligence (AI) reveal striking patterns: technical experts hailing from geopolitical rivals, such as the United States and China, readily collaborate on technical AI standards within transnational standard-setting organizations, whereas governments are much less willing to collaborate on global ethical AI standards within international organizations. Whether competition or cooperation prevails can be explained by three variables: the actors that make up the membership of the standard-setting organization, the issues on which the organization's standard-setting efforts focus, and the “games” actors play when trying to set standards within a particular type of organization. A preliminary empirical analysis provides support for the contention that actors, issues, and games affect the prospects for cooperation on global AI standards. It matters because shared standards are vital for achieving truly global frameworks for the governance of AI. Such global frameworks, in turn, lower transaction costs and the probability that the world will witness the emergence of AI systems that threaten human rights and fundamental freedoms. 相似文献
139.
140.