Working On,Through and Around the State: The Deep Marketisation of Development in the Asia-Pacific

Abstract

This article describes an important new push by international financial institutions towards broadening and deepening capitalist social relations in the underdeveloped world in ways well beyond Washington Consensus structural adjustment or even post-Washington Consensus forms of institutionally-oriented “participatory neo-liberalism.” Described here as the “deep marketisation of development” (or simply “deep marketisation”), this process is attracting increasing resources that are formally allocated directly to private actors around states, while also demanding and promoting shifts in state form and function that relate to cultivating “enabling environments” for capital and facilitating “access to finance.” The article begins by conceptualising deep marketisation and placing it in historical and political context. The second section presents examples of deep marketisation in action in the work of the World Bank's private sector arm, the International Finance Corporation, in the Asia-Pacific. The article concludes by highlighting some serious concerns with the deep marketisation agenda.     

彝族民间调解与国家法律制度的良性互动

彝族人民在几千年历史中,形成了以民间德古调解为主的多元化传统纠纷解决机制。拟在彝族民间调解制度的运行情况的现状分析基础上,提出彝族民间调解与国家法律制度的良性互动,整合民间纠纷调解的资源,推行多元化调解机制,构建大调解格局。     

城乡多维互动改革与发展法制研究——以财税法制研究为视角

统筹城乡综合配套改革试验区是化解二元结构的改革与发展的系统性试验工程,此举已然跨越了基层乡镇后农业税时代的财税桎梏,以期籍社会主义市场经济的制度创新、拼缝与叠加优势推动城乡统筹发展,使后农业税时代的乡镇财政困局在一个厚实而宏大的背景中实现城乡社会结构功能耦合的稳态社会目标。践行此目标无疑应是多维度透视城乡分隔渐行渐远的脉络与因果,进而"破门拆墙"拉近城乡距离,并依赖财税法制变革的管径,运用社会主义制度内在的积极再干预理念和社会结构理论的内生动力,推动城乡多维统筹互动发展,而不是无视历史沉疴单向度地推行经济或财税或户籍等制度变革。     

甲基苯丙胺和氯胺酮在家兔体内毒代动力学及相互影响

目的比较家兔单独静脉注射甲基苯丙胺、氯胺酮及二种药物联合静注时的毒物代谢动力学过程,评价二种药物毒代动力学的相互作用。方法单用甲基苯丙胺组以3mg/kg剂量家兔静脉注射甲基苯丙胺,单用氯胺酮组以30mg/kg剂量家兔静脉注射氯胺酮,合用组以相同剂量同时注射两种药物。分别于给药后不同时间点收集血浆标本,测定各时间点药物浓度,WinNonLin软件拟合毒代动力学房室模型并计算参数。结果甲基苯丙胺在家兔体内的毒代动力学过程呈一级动力学特征,符合单室模型,合用氯胺酮后不改变其模型类型。氯胺酮在家兔体内的毒代动力学过程呈一级动力学特征,符合单室模型,合用甲基苯丙胺后符合二室模型。结论甲基苯丙胺和氯胺酮可以相互延缓其在体内的消除过程,增加彼此在体内的吸收,从而延长作用时间。     

Cheating in sport： Lithuanian case for legal regulation

Globally much attention is paid to cheating in sports, known as ＂war on performance enhancing drugs＂,＂concern for criminalization＂, ＂eradicating menaces to sport＇s integrity＂ etc. Meanwhile, in Lithuania the legal framework of cheating in sport is quite new and almost every kind of law is theoretically possible, therefore it is important to ascertain the relationship between disciplinary, civil, administrative and criminal law. Two dangerous forms of cheating are chosen to analyze in this work： doping and match-fixing. In conformity with said analysis primary guidelines for potential legal regulation are offered.     

论CISG在一些国际商事案件中的应用(英文)

本文系作者根据其办理国际商事案的笔记整理撰写,主要涉及《销售公约》的适用、公约与内国法的互动、国际法优先、原《涉外经济合同法》第6条规定的缺陷及其对中国仲裁员的但他们却往往没有意识到的负面影响;作者还希图让同行注意澳大利亚学者Marcus S Jacobs在其专门为中国同行撰写的文章中对《销售公约》适用的见解。     

公共治理的理论基础:政府、市场与社会的三边互动

政府、市场与公民社会作为公共事务管理的制度与机制安排,有其各自独特的行动资源及行动逻辑,也各有其特定的行动范围和有效边界。在公共治理理论的视阈下,政府、市场与社会都不是惟一的治理主体,三者间的互动、合作成为必然选择。政府、市场与公民社会三种机制运行中各存在比较优势与不足,公共治理的理论基础是政府、市场与公民社会的三边互动。为了实现公共领域的良好治理,必须而且应当建立起三者良性互动的网络治理机制,在互动中开辟解决社会公共问题、增进社会公共利益的有效途径。     

基于协同演化效应的专业市场与产业集群互动创生机制研究——以“义乌商圈”为例

专业市场与产业集群互动发展是区域经济发展过程中重要而独特的经济演化现象。基于经济系统之间的协同演化效应,本文提出了一个专业市场与产业集群互动的创生机制概念模式,以揭示二者互动的一般条件和特殊条件及其对互动过程与模式的支撑和决定作用。最后,以＂义乌商圈＂为例,重点分析了专业市场主导型互动模式的演化特征及其条件。     

TOWARD AN ANALYTICAL CRIMINOLOGY: THE MICRO–MACRO PROBLEM,CAUSAL MECHANISMS,AND PUBLIC POLICY

In this address, I revisit the micro–macro problem in criminology, arguing for an “analytical criminology” that takes an integrated approach to the micro–macro problem. I begin by contrasting an integrated methodological‐individualist approach with traditional holist and individualist approaches. An integrated approach considers the concept of emergence and tackles the difficult problem of specifying causal mechanisms by which interactions among individuals produce social organizational outcomes. After presenting a few examples of micro–macro transitions relevant to criminology, I discuss research programs in sociology and economics that focus on these issues. I then discuss the implications of social interaction effects for making causal inferences about crime and for making crime policy recommendations.