完善我国广播组织权制度的原则

广播组织权的保护已引起了国内外学界和实务界的重视,我国应充分认识保护广播组织权的重要性,并参照国际立法,结合我国国情,完善我国的著作权立法,保护广播组织的合法利益,保障人民群众获得信息的权利,以促进文化产业的健康发展。     

罗马法物权冲突及其解决机制探析

物权的冲突与协调是目前引起理论界普遍关注的一个问题。罗马法在物权的冲突与协调上有一些原初的规定 ,但欠缺系统和抽象。应重新对这些精辟但略显分散的规定进行体系化整理。整理分为两部分 ,一部分对罗马法物权冲突的类型和解决规则进行归纳 ;另一部分是对冲突的解决机制进行整理。通过整理 ,力求发现罗马法对现代物权冲突解决的启发意义。     

美国的董事业务调查权及其对我国的借鉴意义

明确包括业务调查权在内的董事知情权,对于完善公司治理具有重要意义。在美国,董事之所以被赋予业务调查权,主要因为董事不论在决定公司业务执行之际、抑或在监督公司业务执行之际,其为了履行该等职责必须正确知晓公司的业务及财务状况。但关于该权利的性质,美国司法实践上以及学说理论界都存在分歧,在此,美国法律协会的观点及采取限制性立场的判例理论对我国立法具有借鉴意义。     

渔业权生成的法理基础研究

渔业权的概念在理论界是存在的.但我国的<物权法>及<渔业法>均没有创设这种权利.在廓清渔业权是否存在的争论焦点基础之上,进一步明晰了渔业权产生的法理基础,即应从权利的视角重新建构渔业权.     

The Ends of Deliberation: Meta‐consensus and Inter‐subjective Rationality as Ideal Outcomes

Normative deliberative theory has contributed much to an understanding of ideal procedural standards, but there is considerable uncertainty regarding the appropriate nature of desired deliberative outcomes. In this paper we identify two inter‐related concepts of meta‐consensus and inter‐subjective rationality as outcomes that an authentic deliberative process ought to produce. Importantly, these deliberative ends are consistent with ideal deliberative procedure. They are also empirically tractable, where preference transformation can be described in terms of underlying values, and judgments. Methods for assessing deliberative ends are provided and demonstrated using a case study.     

Mixing Habermas with Bayes: Methodological and Theoretical Advances in the Study of Deliberation

Two challenges stand out in the study of deliberation: the development of appropriate methodological tools and the development of more unified analytical frameworks. On the one hand, analysing deliberative processes is demanding and time‐consuming; hence we tend to have only few and non‐randomly selected cases at the group or context level. In addition, the real world of deliberation presents us with a complex matrix of nested, cross‐classified, and repeated speakers. This article shows that Bayesian multi‐level modelling provides an elegant way to tackle these methodological problems. On the other hand, we attempt to enrich comparative institutionalism with individual characteristics and psychologically relevant variables (such as group composition). Focusing on Swiss and German parliamentary debates we show that institutional factors ‐ in particular, consensus systems ‐, the gender composition of committees and plenary sessions, and age matter for the quality of deliberation. Furthermore, we also show that partisan affiliation ‐ government or opposition status of MPs ‐ affects deliberative quality and can refine institutional arguments. We conclude that a multi‐level approach to deliberation focusing on contextual and actor‐related characteristics and using Bayesian hierarchical modelling paves the way toward a more advanced understanding ‐ and methodological handling ‐ of deliberative processes.     

离婚扶养给付制度初探

我国婚姻法关于离婚扶养给付制度在立法上存在疏漏,离婚扶养立法的请求权基础不明确,以夫妻分别财产制限定家务劳动补偿与现实脱节,经济帮助制度适用条件过于苛刻.离婚扶养给付本质为夫妻扶养义务的延续,其请求权基础为配偶权的延伸保护.通过借鉴外国立法体例,认为我国婚姻法应建立以救助性扶养、补偿性扶养为基础,兼顾居住权的离婚扶养给付制度,并具体从它的要件、考虑因素以及限制予以明确规定.     

浅析二手车交易中的物权归属确定

二手车交易中的确权问题对解决二手车买卖引起的纠纷十分必要.主要观点,一是二手车交易合同的有效性不能确定二手车物权变动生效;二是依据不动产登记确定不动产物权的有限性以及当前我国二手车市场发票制度的不完善,物权的意思表示可以作为确定二手车权利归属的补充.     

婚姻家庭法中的儿童最大利益原则

儿童最大利益原则是《儿童权利公约》中规定的原则,是保护儿童权利的根本准则。它确立了一个重要理念,即涉及儿童的所有行为均应以"儿童的最大利益"为首要考虑。婚姻家庭法中如何体现该原则,现行法律存在较多疏漏,尤其在离婚后父母对未成年子女监护权和探视权的行使方面仍然存在许多需进一步完善的地方。     

关于建构我国传闻证据规则的理论思考

证人庭外的证言以及在法庭上陈述的非亲身经历的事实,通常不能作为法庭认定犯罪事实的依据.传闻证据规则的确立具有深厚的理论基础,其中最主要的是正当程序的理论.我国没有建立传闻证据规则,原因在于观念和机制两方面存在制约.应该在我国建构传闻证据规则,在不损害被告人质证权的前提下,设置例外情况.