陈云延安时期的经济思想及其意义

陈云在延安时期主持陕甘宁边区的财经工作,统筹贸易、金融、财政工作,出色地执行了＂发展经济、保障供给＂的总方针,创造了中外战时财经史上鲜为人知的光辉的一页,也为开国后的财经工作积累了丰富经验。     

关于公安边防派出所群众联防工作的研究

群众联防工作是以群众为主体,在当地政府及公安机关的指导下自发形成的联防组织。在当前的警务革命中,群众联防工作在基层社会治安维护上发挥着越来越重要的作用,成为了维护社会稳定工作的重要方面。文章通过对边防派出所群众联防工作的研究,系统地分析了当前边防派出所群众联防工作的特点、状况以及当前的组织模式,并对未来群众联防工作的建设和发展方向进行了探讨。     

浅论高科技警用装备在道口安检工作中的现实意义与发展对策

大力推进道口安检警用装备的现代化和高科技化，对进一步提升道口安检能力与加强检查站的规范化建设具有十分重要的现实意义。因此，公安机关应当探索和完善高科技警用装备在安检实践中的推广应用。     

抗日战争时期陕甘宁边区统战机构考辨

抗日战争时期在陕甘宁边区先后设立的中共中央西北局统战部、西北局民运部、延安交际处,以及具有统战性质的西北局友军工作委员会和友军工作核心组等负责统战工作的机构,在中共中央的直接领导下,在调查和研究各党派各友军的情况,落实＂三三制＂中有关统一战线政策,管理非党干部,调查、研究、管理少数民族工作和外事接待,情报收集等方面做了大量工作,为建设和发展边区新民主主义的政治、经济、文化,把边区建设成团结、抗战、民主的坚强堡垒,奠定了稳固的基石。     

论边境生态文化旅游--东兴旅游发展战略选择

边境旅游是我国新兴的旅游形式。东兴作为中越边境的旅游地具有独特的区位优势和旅游资源优势。交通可达性、城镇依托关系及区域市场潜在因素成为支撑东兴成为旅游中心地的基本条件。边境资源、生态资源、文化资源的特质使东兴旅游具有较大的开发潜力。据此 ,东兴的旅游发展战略可确定为“以边境旅游为基础 ,以生态旅游为主导 ,以文化旅游为底蕴”的多元发展战略。这一战略的实施措施主要为 :科学制订旅游发展总体规则 ;加大优势宣传 ,形成中越双向交流和活而有序的边境旅游格局和管理模式 ;将生态旅游作为长期的发展战略目标来抓 ;对文化旅游进行深入研究和整合 ;形成多元旅游投资体系。     

开展中俄农业合作，构建外向型优势农业

黑龙江省与俄罗斯远东地区有3040公里的边境线,发展外向型优势农业前景广阔。东宁县正按照"科学规划、合理布局、迅速启动、分步实施"的原则,努力构建"黑龙江省东南部—北部沿边地区外向型优势农业发展带",形成纵贯中俄边境、产业密集度高、利益联结紧密的特定农业示范区域。     

“智慧城市”背景下的城市公交安全问题研究

随着中国城市化进程的不断加快,"智慧城市"建设方兴未艾,从理念、技术、标准等方面实现了对"城市安全"的全面提升,成为新时代中国城市发展的战略新选择。在城市公交安全方面,面对城市公交暴力升级、冲突频发、犯因复杂、防范困难等问题,智慧城市为解决系列难题提供了新思路:既要眼光向内强质效,加快公交运营智能化,实现"智能公交"与"公交都市"战略的同步推进,大力推动辅助驾驶系统的智能升级、安全防范设施的智能改造和便民服务系统的智能推广;又要共建共享寻合作,构建安全保障共同体,寻求"智能公交"与"智慧警务"的协同创新,促进二者在安防技术联网互通、安全数据实时共享和安全协同合作平台等方面的联合革新。     

特朗普政府反恐预警机制改革论析

特朗普上台伊始,以“伊斯兰国”为代表的外部恐怖力量的恶性发展和本土“独狼”式恐怖袭击的频发严重威胁着美国安全,民众不安全感因此持续上升,加之美国反恐系统的缺陷,要求改革美国反恐预警机制的呼声日增。特朗普政府改革反恐预警机制的举措主要包括加强反恐情报搜集和分析、加强与盟友的情报合作与共享机制、加强边界与海关的预防管控、强化反恐预防执法机制、修正国家威胁警报系统公告发布机制等五个方面。纵观特朗普政府执政近两年的反恐预警机制改革实践,其实际效果并不明显。特朗普与情报界的紧张关系及特朗普政府的情报失误、强化移民治理机制、预防恐怖分子政策、对穆斯林敌对性的移民政策、边界预防管控的任性政策及反恐战略的不确定性等,都将影响美国正常反恐预警机制的形成,也会影响美国反恐预警机制的效果与改革方向。美国要预防恐怖主义需要在国内解决社会分裂问题,在国外放弃霸凌政策以缓解反美力量的对美的敌对情绪,美国面临的恐怖威胁才有可能降低。     

Naqshbandi Sufis and their conception of place,time and fear on the Turkish-Syrian border and borderland

The employment of diverse forms of security and control on territorial borders have led to the production of numerous events of border crossings, smuggling, banditry and death along with stories of separation, loss, mourning, pain, and yearning in the everyday life of border people. The Naqshbandi Khaznavi order has an expansive interpersonal social network across the political borders of Turkish and Syrian nation-states. This work analyzes the ways in which Sufis dealt with diverse aspects of the Turkish-Syrian border by unbinding shackles and orders of political system that were fabricated constantly from the 1920s to the early 1980s. The life stories and narratives of the Sufis document the existence of a religious-cultural landscape, diversifying the perception of place, time and fear which have transcended political borders for decades, contradicting official cartographic imagination and the modern-secular understanding of place and time. Besides, in addition to analyses of religious orders as social, economic and political entities, this work aims to elucidate emotional aspects of relations and faith that coexist between Sufis and their Sheikh in the context of spatial distance, political border and fear of death.     

The global political economy of climate change,agriculture and food systems

The food and agriculture sector is both a major contributor to climate change and especially vulnerable to its worst impacts. This means that much is at stake in what is a complex set of contested political dynamics as new governance agendas are rolled out. On one hand, there is a strong push for ‘climate-smart agriculture’ (CSA) and related initiatives in the area of marine resources such as the idea of the blue economy, as an attempt to bring a range of viewpoints together to address the interrelationship between these ecological and economic systems. On the other hand, critics see these strategies as promotion of more of the same kinds of policies that created stress in the climate–food system in the first place. To unpack these issues, this special forum brings together a collection of papers that highlight three overlapping themes that lie at the centre of these debates, yet which have not been fully acknowledged by those implementing CSA initiatives: the role of power and interests in shaping governance approaches to climate and food systems; the ways in which existing approaches, primarily those promoting open markets and technology, are reinforced in governance initiatives; and the sidelining of questions of inequality.