简议范仲淹的司法改革思想

文章集中论述了北宋改革家范仲淹在庆历新政中推行司法改革 ,提出加强司法监督 ,强化刑部职能 ,重命令 ,准律文 ,慎选司法官吏等重大指施 ,充分地反映了范仲淹的司法改革思想     

港澳台与大陆遗嘱形式比较及借鉴

伴随着两岸四地跨法域婚姻家庭的不断增多,跨法域继承关系也相应增加,继承法律制度冲突出现。在“一国两制”框架下,统一实体法难以实现,为合理解决冲突,研究港澳台继承制度,完善大陆继承制度尤为必要。     

家族企业继承机制及其文化基础的国际比较

家族企业对经济的重要贡献已经得到公认 ,而家族企业对继承人的选择、培养以及是否实施适当的继承规划机制是关系到家族企业的持续发展、乃至生死存亡的关键问题 ,本文试图通过比较华人家族企业、美国家族企业和日本家族企业在企业代际传承中的实践 ,发现华人家族企业的现状 ,以便对华人家族企业下一步应采取的步骤有更清楚的认识。     

上级命令不免责原则中相关概念的分析

上级命令不免除责任原则是国际刑法的基本原则之一。对该原则中的上级命令“明显非法”、“道德选择”、“胁迫”等有关概念作进一步的剖析。     

西方遗嘱继承理念变迁及规律

＂家族协同说＂是古代社会的遗产继承理论,近代思想家依据自然法提出了遗嘱继承＂意志说＂,现当代法学家从关注社会利益的视角出发,提出了遗嘱继承＂社会利益说＂。西方遗嘱继承理念的变迁,表现为从＂家族协同说＂、＂意志说＂再到＂社会利益说＂这样一个历史发展过程,并呈现出多样化特质,但总的发展趋势与规律是走向个人、家庭与社会之间的利益平衡。     

CPS与ERP测谎方法不同测试顺序优越性的比较研究

ERP测谎技术作为一种新兴的测试技术不断应用于实际测试过程中，而为了保证测试的准确性，往往会将ERP测谎技术和CPS测谎技术结合使用。但两种测谎技术的测试顺序是否会对测试结论存在影响还无定论，因此文章拟利用同一模拟案件情境对被测人分别进行CPS和ERP测谎，并以测试顺序为变量来分析不同的测试顺序对测试结论是否具有显著影响，以期为心理测试实践提供一定的参考意见。     

Privacy,anonymity and liability: Will anonymous communicators have the last laugh?

In this paper, the author sets out the way in which the UK approach to privacy protection is able to extend its reach to anonymous postings. Whilst anonymity might sometimes be seen as one of the essential characteristics of communicating on-line, it does not provide an impenetrable veil of protection in respect of a privacy violation claim. Instead, there are avenues available to identify anonymous communicators, which have implications both for internet freedom and jurisdiction in cyberspace. In the UK, our common law has not denied bloggers, or other on-line contributors, anonymity per se. However, it will be argued that recent UK judgments represent a warning to anonymous communicators that they can be held liable for what they post on-line and that naivety is no defence at law. Whilst on-line platforms allow people to effectively become journalists; to become publishers, as familiar users, they should become more aware of the consequences of their on-line postings and appreciate that they will not be able to escape from the application of third party disclosure orders. However, as these are not without their problems, it is possible that anonymous communicators may have the last laugh.     

How research ethics' protections can contribute to public policy: the case of community treatment orders

Though community treatment orders (CTOs) were first used in 1986 in Australia, debate about their clinical and ethical merits continues even today. For some, the benefits of reduced frequency and duration of involuntary hospitalizations are believed to adequately outweigh the harms of restricted liberties in community living. For others, however, such benefits are believed to be achievable by simply arranging integrated, devoted community resources sans any threat of forced re-hospitalization. In response to this enduring controversy, this article examines the ethical merits of community orders using a novel approach. “Novel” because the examination is based on research ethics and its foundational principles.When hospital and community clinicians, family members, consumer/survivors, and advocacy groups discussed the idea of amending Ontario's mental health legislation to permit CTOs in the late 1990s, evidence of their effects and efficacy was very limited. Moreover, an order was characterized much like standard pharmacological or medical therapies because the person or an appropriate substitute decision maker's consent was necessary to authorize the order or make it valid. These two factors prompted this retrospective analysis: if CTOs - as a public policy initiative - had been treated like most other promising therapies, would any different ethics-related concerns have been raised that, in turn, would have benefited the public debate and the legislature's decisions? In other words, if respected safeguards that apply to new drugs and medical devices had applied to CTOs, would anything have changed?     

唐代家庭财产的法律继承和遗嘱继承

隋代以来的“析籍”政策将大家族、大家庭解体为家庭、小家庭 ,随之而来的是大范围的分家析产。唐代初期 ,为了确保国家的赋役 ,防止百姓借“合户”“析户”逃避纳赋服役 ,唐王朝先后制订了与解决这些问题有关的分家析产政策 ,终于催生了一套以《户令》为中心、实际可行的分家及家产继承法令 ,这是中国历史上第一部成熟的相关法令。同时 ,这些政策、法令的施行 ,又为家产的遗嘱继承提供了可能 ,家产预分开始得到人们的重视。家产的遗嘱继承 ,既依照分家及家产继承法令 ,也突出了家长对财产的处分权和子孙的析产愿望。至唐代中晚期 ,以遗嘱继承为主要形式的家产预分 ,成为分家析产的重要方式。