History,memory and nation building in the post-Soviet colonial space

This is an article on Bolshevik nationalities policy and ethnic engineering, asking who, in fact, decided which populations belonged together as ethnic groups (narodnost') and thus had the right of national self-determination, and how the level of autonomy was determined for each ethnic unit. Scholars have dealt with Russian and Soviet nationalities issues for decades already, but they have turned their attention mainly to the larger nationalities (at the level of SSR, and to a lesser degree the levels of ASSR and autonomous oblast). I argue that the lower levels of national territorial autonomy in the Soviet Union (national okrug, raion, volost', and selsovet) are worthy of greater academic attention, at least from the ethnological point of view. Having this kind of low-level territorial autonomy has often been a question of to be or not to be for the small ethnic groups concerned, and hence the subject is connected with the question of preservation of cultural and linguistic diversity in Russia.     

危机动员与中国社会团体的发展

在全球化的国际环境背景下 ,现代社会既是一个常态管理的社会 ,也是一个呈现多种危机的非常态管理社会。在处理危机事件中 ,不仅需要采用行政动员和政治动员的常规形式 ,而且还需要启用符合社会主义市场经济的社会动员形式 ,充分发挥社会团体在危机动员中的积极作用 ,开发社会总资源 ,降低社会总成本 ,及时有效地扼制危机事件 ,使社会尽快回复到正常的生活和工作状态。政府在确立危机意识、成本意识和主体意识的同时 ,应适时进行制度安排 ,把社会团体在危机应对中的重要作用显现在各种制度安排中 ,真正构建起政府、市场与社会三元关系良性循环的新型结构     

网络犯罪管辖权问题研究

在现行刑事案件管辖制度的基础上,网络犯罪管辖权应进一步细化联结点并确立优先次序.不同类型的网络犯罪在管辖权设定上的关注点应有所不同.网络犯罪案件的管辖应当遵循实体法与程序法相一致、案件的全面覆盖与均衡分布、便利性等价值追求.以实施网络犯罪行为的计算机终端所在地为行为地,以受害人发现权利被侵害的计算机终端所在地为犯罪结果发生地,并辅之以被告人住所地,确立一个分层次的网络犯罪司法管辖体系.     

涉外继承案件专属管辖考

涉外继承案件是否属于专属管辖范围,从我国《民事诉讼法》的规定看,答案似乎是肯定的,但理论上存有相当大的争议,且实践中,这样的理解也难以变成实际操作。纵观大陆法系德日法等国家立法,将涉外继承案件列入专属管辖范围实属罕见。就国内层面而言,专属管辖可以从法院职能角度和案件特殊性角度进行广义理解,但在国际层面,尤其涉及司法裁决域外承认与执行问题的时候,专属管辖范围的限制就尤为重要;因此,有关不动产物权、法人清算或破产、知识产权诉讼等专属某国法院管辖的观点和做法,日益成为各国普遍认可的事实。从这个角度来看,我们更应审视我国现有规定,从而为涉外继承寻找出合理的法律地位。     

Cooperation-benefit and social mobilization： The basement of harmonious society

As a goal pursued by human beings, a harmonious society can be constructed through a bottom to up social construction mechanism and top to bottom social mobilization mechanism. A healthy social construction mechanism can promote social wealth and allocate it impartially by jointing production of member of society and cooperation-benefit. At the same time, a good social mobilization mechanism, on the other way, makes the members of society reach a harmonious consensus by social mobilization and social civilization. In order to create these two types of mechanisms, public administrators need to develop mechanisms to promote cooperation and develop cooperation productivity. These mechanisms include social trust mechanism, information sharing mechanism, supervision and restraining mechanism and the mechanism for the distribution of interests.     

论战时舆论动员

舆论动员在战争舞台上扮演着越来越重要的角色。与其他战争动员样式相比,舆论动员是一种精神动员、信息动员、公众动员和媒体动员,是实现战时快速动员的基本保证,直接影响着战争的进程和结局。中国共产党在长期革命斗争实践中,构建了独具特色的战时舆论动员范式。其中,对战时舆论动员基本原则的范式认知主要包括:军事斗争谋略与舆论宣传思想高度统一,政治斗争规律与舆论宣传规律高度统一,舆论宣传实践与马克思主义新闻思想高度统一;对战时舆论动员基本路径的范式认知主要包括:争取一切力量扩大舆论阵地,整合新闻资源形成舆论强势,运用典型示范引导舆论走向。     

Self-determination,group identity and the common will

ABSTRACT

Anna Stilz defends a political autonomy account of self-determination that, she argues, best explains our intuitions about why colonization, annexation and foreign occupation are wrong. These are wrong, on Stilz’s view, because they unilaterally coerce individuals living under those systems of government. I argue that Stilz does not show that her account of self-determination explains our intuitions about autonomy in these kinds of cases, because she does not have a separate argument for the value of belonging to particular political groups.     

领土条约的界定标准、解释方法及其运行结构

领土主权属于一国的核心利益问题。国际法院基于《维也纳条约法公约》第31-32条之规定,在解决领土条约争端时采取了"实质优于形式"和"同意"等界定标准。同时,在适用该《公约》解释相关条款时采取了不同的解释方法,体现了一定的灵活性,但也出现过矛盾与反复。对此,应根据该《公约》第31-32条规定的内部要素及外部变量,优化领土条约的解释方法和运行结构。这种路径的设计不再拘泥于《条约法公约》本身,适当拓展、引入当事方提供的证明事实真相的关键证据,对领土条约的解释进行补充说明,并非游离于《条约法公约》之外,转而寻求保持占有法律、有效控制等法理基础及相应的事实主张和证据,而是将两者合而为一,以《条约法公约》解释规则为主,其他关键证据为辅的层级解释路径。另外,国际法院在解释相关领土条约时,除了适用"《条约法公约》+其他层级关键证据"模式外,还应借鉴学界的解释方法论,以使得两者交互影响,进一步完善条约解释方法的路径,实现对领土条约解释规则的再造。     

Explaining community mobilization in the city of Vilnius: a search for social capital

The article explores community mobilization in the urban environment. Specifically, it examines community organizations in Lithuania’s capital city of Vilnius. Engaging with social capital theory, the article illustrates the actual community mobilizations, their stories, collective action strategies, and reasons for mobilizing. It challenges the assumption that mobilizations rarely take place in the urban environment of Lithuania due to low civil society and a nonparticipatory culture. This article shows that when mobilizations do take place, they can be short lived but still achieve significant results.     

市场非常规行动的生成及实践成效——以地震灾区马口村贫困村民住房重建为例

纯粹的市场难以启动地震灾区重建。在国家政策与制度安排干预下,以及在农户自身社会资本支撑下,形成了地震灾区住房重建市场非常规行动。在注重灾后重建成效的同时,非常规行动的外部性也成为人们关注的焦点。集体行动下的市场建材价格上扬及行动长效机制的缺失等,对构建持续与稳定的灾后重建秩序产生了不利的影响。