The founders of the association for the study of nationalities: the case of Stepan Horak (1920–1986) and the Shevchenko Scientific Society,USA

The present article critically evaluates the contribution of the Shevchenko Scientific Society, USA, and the founder of the Association for the Study of Nationalities (ASN), Stepan Horak, to the genesis and development of the ASN.     

中日经济立法与理论研究之比较

中日两国都是当今世界上经济法最为繁盛的国家。两国的经济都经历三个非常相似的阶段,两国的经济法立法相应地分为三个阶段。纵观中日两国经济法立法史,中、日两国都十分重视经济法立法,强调政府对经济发展的主导作用,立法赋予了政府较多市场规制权限,“强政府”形象凸显于市场。但是,二者之间的差异也是十分明显的。中国的经济法学研究在短短的二十年之内经历了模仿、引进阶段,逐步形成了独具特色、成熟的经济法理论体系,流派纷呈。在日本,经济法学界的分歧较小,普遍认为反垄断法是经济法的核心和基本内容。     

法国土地征收公益性审查机制及其对中国的启示

在法国,只有国家可以为了公共利益的需要征收私人土地,并且按照司法最终原则,由行政法官判断土地征收的公用目的性。最高行政法院在长期审判实践中形成了"损益对比分析理论"。该理论的应用加强了对土地征收公用目的宣告行为司法审查的力度。在加强对行政机关裁量权司法监督的同时,损益对比分析机制并未超越行政行为合法性审查的界限,它为行政机关在多个合法方案间自由选择保留了足够的裁量空间。     

西方自由贸易理论与发展我国劳动密集型产业的思考

我国拥有丰富而且廉价的劳动力资源,以劳动要素和资源禀赋差异形成的比较优势参与国际分工。带动了国内劳动密集型产业的快速发展。但这种优势目前正在面临挑战。要努力实现人力资源优势由数量型向质量型的转变,将比较优势转化为竞争优势,营造核心竞争力,推动产业升级。     

Measuring the impact of law enforcement on organized crime

This article explores the possibility of measuring the impact of law enforcement on organized crime in a reliable and accountable manner, both in general terms and with a practical focus on the Canadian context. In considering measures to combat organized crime, a focus on process measurement has obscured the more substantial question of progress as regards the dependent variable itself: the bottom line of reducing the impact of organized criminal behaviour. While outcome measures are more challenging to identify than process measures, this fact alone does not minimize the need to demonstrate the connection between organized crime enforcement and its presumed outcomes to a greater degree of certainty. To date, this has not been realized to any significant degree, as revealed by a review of existing international approaches to measuring the impact of enforcement activity. The article argues that a multidisciplinary focus on community level indicators of crime, if initially less accessible than process measures of impact on organized crime groups, offers promise as a measurement of absolute and relative impact of state investment in enforcement.

Organized Crime in Asia: A Review of Problems and Progress

This paper provides a preliminary overview of research on organized crime in Asia drawing on selected papers from a symposium held at the National University of Singapore in June 2007. We draw on these contributions to emphasize the enterprise nature of organized crime and the common problems encountered by law enforcement in controlling and preventing the many harms inflicted by serious criminal activity. Recent attempts to address the changing character and forms of transnational organized crime, especially through the strengthening of mutual legal assistance by regional bodies such as ASEAN, are noted. These measures have yet to develop into the cross-border institutional frameworks now found in Europe, and the level of effective co-operation can only continue to improve. Countering organized crime in Asia also faces additional difficulties arising from the cultural diversity, relative weakness of law enforcement in some states and the lack of common strategies in respect to illicit markets.

第二语言习得成功的关键因素--学习动机的激发与培养

学习动机是影响第二语言习得的诸多因素中最具能动性的,学习动机的激发与培养是直接导致第二语言习得成败的关键所在.学习动机是仅次于语言学习技能的最强有力的学习效果预测因素.与学习动机相关的主要因素有学习成就、动机的强度、社会文化因素以及学习者探索外部世界、渴望学习知识、提高自我能力、通过各种考试的几种不同需要.教师可以从树立学习理想,端正学习态度,明确学习目标,确定学习内容;强化激励机制,营造学习氛围;丰富教学方法,精选"教材"教具;平等善待学生,鼓励参与活动;重视文化输入,培养学习兴趣等六个方面进行激发和培养学生第二语言的学习动机.     

认真对待行政指导诉权——行政指导可诉性比较研究

行政指导在性质上实际是一种具有弱权力、准强制性的服务性行政行为。行政指导的性质决定着行政指导具有被行政主体违法行使而侵害行政相对人合法权益的可能,完全具有诉讼的必要性和可行性,国外在这方面已经作了有益的探索。我国应当尽快完善相关立法,明确将行政指导纳入行政诉讼的受案范围,以充分保护行政相对人的合法权益。     

中西警察学研究的区别与趋同

中国人在引进西方警察科学时不仅改进了我国的警务实践,更深化了警察学的理论研究,创造了警察学。随着我国警察学研究的进一步深化和发展,越来越多的警察学研究者提出创建独立的警察学大学科。但是,中国警察学毕竟不同于西方的警察学。因此,对中西方警察学的研究予以比较,借鉴西方警察学研究的优点,回避其缺陷,探索出我国警察学建设的发展方向就显得极其必要。     

庭前会议中非法证据排除处理方法研究

2013年1月施行的《刑事诉讼法》中增加了庭前会议程序,其中对于非法证据排除的相关内容引起了法学理论界和司法实务部门的广泛关注,对庭前会议司法实践的实证研究表明庭前会议程序本身还存在法规模糊、制度欠缺等问题,其中对于非法证据的处理更是争议的焦点.在系统分析我国现行法律法规体系中有关庭前会议中非法证据排除的相关条款的基础之上,通过对司法实践以及法学理论界的不同观点的考察,本文从我国当前刑事司法体系发展阶段及特点出发,提出除控辩双方争议较大的情况以外,非法证据排除问题原则上应当在庭前会议中解决,同时法律法规应明确庭前会议中非法证据排除决定的效力.