浅谈犯罪心理痕迹在现场勘查中的运用

犯罪现场上有许多痕迹物证,而这些客观的痕迹物证上又会显示出犯罪人的心理活动,这些主观心理痕迹反映在客观物证上对侦查员侦查破案具有十分重要的意义。侦查员可以运用实体痕迹分析法、逻辑推理分析法、专业整合分析法等行之有效的方法展开侦查破案。     

关于主犯未到案案件侦查程序的思考

共同犯罪中主犯未到案案件给侦查程序带来一系列的逻辑矛盾,它把侦查程序架设在一个不能继续又不能终结的尴尬境地。在侦查工作实践中,把到案的、未能证明是主犯的犯罪嫌疑人按现有证据直接移送起诉符合现实需要,也得到了检察机关的认可,但违背了法律逻辑。建议对比较轻微的犯罪嫌疑人严格依照法律,适时变更强制措施;在比较严重的共同犯罪案件中可以回避主犯与从犯的矛盾,不区分主犯和从犯,根据公安机关掌握的犯罪证据直接移送起诉。     

关于犯罪现场勘查课程考核方式的思考

考核是教学的有机组成部分,考试的目的在于促进学生的学习,巩固他们所学知识,提高他们学以致用的能力。犯罪现场勘查学作为一门实践性很强的学科,其考核的方式对学生知识和能力的培养起着十分重要的意义,探讨当前犯罪现场勘查课程的考核方式并提出改革对策,有助于培养符合公安实战需要的合格人才。     

Random votes under compulsory voting: Evidence from Brazil

Compulsory voting is known for boosting electoral turnout, even when sanctions for abstaining are small or loosely enforced. Much less is known, however, about the consequences of compulsory voting on vote choice, and, in particular, about the quality of electoral decisions. In this paper, we explore the extent to which voters meaningfully engage in the electoral process or simply vote randomly because voting is required by law. We conducted a large online survey in Brazil during the 2018 national elections to assess if voters engage in random voting. We evaluate random voting for low-profile, low-information elected offices (state and federal legislators) and others that receive greater media coverage (governor and president) and evaluate the determinants of random voting for each of them. We find that: 1) random voting does not appear to be affected by social desirability bias; 2) there is substantial random voting under compulsory voting; 3) more voters tend to engage in random voting in low-profile, low-information elections, as compared to elections that receive greater media coverage; and, 4) interest in politics, education, and disposition to vote if voting were to be voluntary reduce random voting. Our findings carry important implications for the study of citizen participation and civic competence under compulsory voting and for democratic representation, more broadly.     

If I only had a brain: Yip Harburg,J. Edgar Hoover,and the failures of FBI intelligence work

E. Y. Harburg, the lyricist behind The Wizard of Oz, remains one of the most important songwriters blacklisted during the Cold War. His removal from Hollywood features in the 1950s denied moviegoers a distinct American voice whose lyrics mixed humor and entertainment to champion liberal causes. From 1944–1972, Director J. Edgar Hoover and the Bureau’s major field offices investigated Harburg. His declassified FBI file shows institutionalized incompetence in the way the Bureau went about writing reports, evaluating evidence, making conclusions, and conducting counter-intelligence work. Harburg’s story illuminates the battle between the left and right to shape popular culture during the Cold War. Hoover and Harburg held opposing views on politics, religion, economics, and race. Yet both men shared a fervent faith in popular culture’s capacity to transform America. Together they vied to remake the nation according to their own distinct visions – Hoover’s fear of declension stood in contrast to Harburg’s hope for radical progress.     

佘祥林冤案中的侦查错误剖析

凡冤案之形成,无不可以追溯至侦查阶段。检讨佘祥林冤案,亦应关注冤案的起点———侦查错误。本文从侦查认识、侦查法治两个维度,对佘案中的侦查错误予以剖析,并就提高侦查防错、纠错能力提出建议。通过剖析,深刻认识到:科学与法治是侦查工作的灵魂。     

毒品犯罪案件中特情侦查的程序控制——以4322件案例为样本的分析

对4 322件毒品犯罪案例的统计分析发现,在特情介入方面,我国各省份的认定比例、控辩审三方的认定态度以及特情的身份来源都呈现多样性,特情参与的案件以零包贩毒为主,内心常因被动且多有引诱行为,被告人适用重刑判决较为少见.反映在实务中则表现为特情的选择条件过于宽泛、案件范围背离规范、启动缺乏证据前提、过度介入以及监控失范等...     

侦查阶段律师辩护工作的理性思考

律师参加刑事诉讼、介入侦查阶段,是现实需要,也有充分的理论根 据,但实际状况不尽如人意。如介入会见难;以“有碍侦查”、“国家秘密”而阻滞律师 介入;存在辩护风险,等等。因此必须对律师在侦查阶段的法律地位、单独会见权、讯 问在场权,以及辩护豁免权等问题进行研究,确保律师辩护的作用。     

城市化进程中完善侦防工作的设想

由于 2 1世纪城市化进程速度的加快 ,我国必将会有一批城市跨入现代化国际大都市的行列 ,成为国家经济、信息、交通、科学文化和国际交往中心 ,在整个国家生活中发挥举足轻重的作用 ,应该通过超前性、可行性的研究 ,提出科学、明确的设想和规划 ,为侦防模式能与城市化进程同步发展提供理论基础。为此 ,笔者结合目前城市化进程与社会治安的关系以及侦防工作中存在的问题 ,提出了完善侦防工作的设想。     

从学校教学的基本目标谈公安侦查专业教学之改革

当前公安侦查专业教学中存在着一些严重影响其教学目标实现的问题,如:教材建设滞后,知识陈旧,教学形式单一;重讲授,轻实践;培养目标笼统,没有形成完整的目标体系等。根据现代教学目标的要求以及公安教育发展的需要,应从学校教学的认知策略、情感态度、动作技能三大基本目标体系出发,对侦查专业教学的计划、内容及教学方法等方面进行有重点的改革。