欧洲整合背景下的德国行政程序变革

伴随欧洲整合以及欧盟法的"同一化"趋势,德国行政法正历经重大变革。在这之中,行政程序堪称是受冲击最大的领域。传统的德国行政程序由于受到"程序仅具有辅助意义"的理念影响,处处体现出追求行政便宜和程序经济、弱化程序价值和相对人程序权利的趋向;而特别强调程序保障的欧盟法则通过直接有效性、优先适用性、同等程度的保护以及有效原则等多种机制,促使德国开始进行大范围的行政程序改革,这些变革内容包括行政公开原则的确立、对公民程序基本权利的承认以及加速行政许可的制度设计等。这些变革为德国行政法迎来了新的发展契机,它也同样为我们提供了绝佳的了解与观察法律整合的范例。     

The Role of Experts in the European Union's Research Policy

This research analyzes the role of experts in the European Union's policy‐making process. Focusing on the field of research policy, this study seeks to probe how expert participation in the Open Method of Coordination informs policy decisions. The paper reports on an analysis of the expert group in the European Internationalization Strategy in Science and Technology. Our analysis reveals the dynamics of expert participation at the micro level, as it identifies who these experts are, how they are appointed, and in what ways expert knowledge gets used in policy making.     

国外区域协调发展立法的比较研究及对我国的启示

随着改革开放的不断深入,我国各个地区的经济都有了迅速发展,但由于地理位置、资源禀赋以及经济基础等方面的原因,各地经济增长速度快慢不一,使得区域间差距越来越大,区域经济发展不平衡已成为严重制约我国国民经济又好又快发展的一个重大问题。而纵观世界经济发展史,美国、日本以及欧盟等国家和地区在区域协调发展上取得了巨大的成功,对其区域协调发展立法进行比较研究,将有助于推动我国的区域协调发展。     

谈发展公安学科的几个认识问题

当前 ,如何科学认识公安学的学科本质 ,准确把握公安学的发展实际 ,正确对待公安学的学科地位和学位建设问题 ,已成为决定学科发展的重要因素。为此 ,我们要正确认识公安学的学科地位 ,明确近期学位建设的奋斗目标 ,加快学科建设 ,以期实现公安学科的跨越式发展     

生态治理中央地府际间的协调结构分析

生态治理中中央政府与地方政府不同形式和程度的矛盾和冲突的存在,决定了必须选择和设计一种良性的协调结构来有效解决之.生态治理中央地府际间的协调结构具有转型国家的特殊性和复杂性.“有限分权”的正式协调结构和“关系主导”的非正式协调结构时而相互对立、相互替代,时而相互依存、相互补充,两者还可以相互转化.因此,在选择和设计协调...     

社会管理创新与警察公共关系变革——以统筹城乡发展为视角

随着统筹城乡发展的深入和城乡一体化进程的加快,对警察公共关系的建设提出了更高要求.统筹城乡发展背景下警察公共关系三要素都呈现出新特点.公安机关务必根据大环境的变迁以及警察公共关系三要素的新特点,根据推进公安机关社会管理创新的要求,有针对性地从公共关系的形象设计、传播、危机处理、交往沟通、评价等方面入手,开展警察公共关系活动的反思和变革.     

Photoshop软件在法医临床学鼻面积测量中的应用初探

在鼻部损伤的法医临床学鉴定中,由于鼻的形态不规则,法医学界对鼻部缺损范围的测量和计算尚无一种统一的、精确的方法。本文利用Photoshop软件与传统的薄膜覆盖法分别对鼻面积进行测量,分析两种测量方法所得结果无统计学差异,因此通过软件法可以简便准确的计算鼻部面积。在伤者受伤前与伤后眼裂等器官长度不变的条件下,将伤者眼裂长度作为伤前照片的"比例尺",根据伤前照片推算其伤前鼻部面积,从而计算出鼻缺损比例,为鼻损伤程度的判定提供了更科学的方法。     

A Multidisciplinary Perspective on the Role,Functions, and Effectiveness of Parenting Coordination

Based on a survey conducted in 2018 in collaboration with the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts’ (AFCC) Task Force on Parenting Coordination, this paper explores issues related to the process and perceived outcomes of parenting coordination for families post separation and divorce. The views expressed emerge from a diverse and multidisciplinary sample (n = 289) from legal, mental health, and conflict resolution backgrounds. Almost half of all participants (46%) were mental health professionals (psychologist, psychiatrist, social worker), followed by attorneys (28%), family mediators (17%) and judges (5%). Over half of all participants identified as a parenting coordinator (PC) (53%). Based on the results, participants had the highest level of agreement that the goal of parenting coordination should be to assist in sheltering the children from parental conflict and to help the coparents reduce interparental conflict. Participants assigned greater success to parenting coordination when there was demonstration that coparenting conflict decreased. Several differences were noted among professional disciplines and specifically between legal and mental health professionals. Mental health professionals rated higher on the effectiveness of PCs to help children adjust and limit their involvement in the parental conflict, while legal professionals focused on PCs’ ability to help families resolve legal disputes. The implications of the results are discussed, including how best to measure the success of parenting coordination and to prioritize outcomes related to the success of parenting coordination across disciplines to create greater consistency in the field.     

Emerging Parenting Coordination Practices Around the Globe: What We Have Learned

Parenting coordination is emerging in numerous countries around the globe as a response to the need to protect children in families whose parents experience high conflict following their separation or divorce. This article describes the different trends in the implementation of parenting coordination programs in Canada, Spain, and Italy and the socio‐legal contexts in which they have evolved. An analysis will also be presented of the unique challenges faced by these countries and the ensuing debates on issues related to the referral process, legal procedures, decision‐making authority, judicial immunity, confidentiality, and professional requirements and training for the appointment of parenting coordinators. The authors will present what has been learned from their respective experiences and make recommendations to promote continued development.     

Building and Enhancing Efficacious Coparenting in Parenting Coordination

Parenting coordination is a dispute resolution process to assist the subset of separating/divorcing parents who remain entrenched in high conflict coparenting post‐separation/divorce. Based on factors known to impact positive child outcomes, its goals include assisting parents to protect children from their conflict and implementing a framework that will assist the child to have a good relationship with both parents. Despite significant efforts, parenting coordination often falls short of achieving its intended goals, which include not only healthy child adjustment but also efficacious coparenting, which is itself an important mediator and moderator of child outcomes. This article raises questions and concerns about the extent to which child outcomes may be limited if the goals of parenting coordination are limited to establishing and implementing a disengaged, parallel model of coparenting, while avoiding or giving up on efforts to build and enhance cooperative coparenting. Given preliminary findings indicating some parents note change here express dissatisfaction with the process and outcomes, it is necessary to consider whether the seemingly intractable subset of parents referred for parenting coordination might benefit from something more or different. We discuss two innovations: One aims to strengthen individual parent readiness and responsiveness and the other brings parents together in a child‐centered team‐building approach. Though cooperative coparenting is a challenging and unrealistic goal for some parents, further research is necessary to understand more fully which interventions help which families, when and in what manner.