犯罪概念及其特征的结构分析

犯罪是事实特征与法律特征的统一,也是内容特征和形式特征的统一。事实特征或者说内容特征,并不仅限于社会危害性,而是社会危害性这一个质的因素与应受刑罚处罚性(简称当罚性或应罚性)这一个量的因素的统一。法益侵害与社会危害性具有相通性。     

私营企业实行民主管理的必然性--"知识经济"时代私营企业管理环境的转变

基于对企业未来发展的考虑,即使是私营企业内部也开始关注"外人莫入"的危害,并且也有希望改变现状、输入"外人"的要求.虽然由于种种原因,不少企业主一时还无法完全将意识中的东西顺利地付诸实践,但是,随着企业发展的客观需要,"外人"会不断加入家族企业.随着"外人"的不断增加,其要求参与企业管理和利益分配的呼声也会越来越高,企业的管理权必然不断地"外流"或"下放",最终促成企业将民主管理视作"最后的解决方案".     

知识经济--当代知识青年尽显身手的舞台

知识经济强调知识对经济增长的主导作用,当代中国知识青年在知识结构、思维能力、思维方式、价值取向等方面所具有的优势与特征,特别适合知识经济发展的基本要求和基本规则.就当代知识青年所具备的迎接知识经济挑战的优势和潜能而言,知识经济是知识青年自己的"经济".     

有组织犯罪侦查策略与方法——从主动型侦查角度切入

随着经济的发展和社会的进步,犯罪形态也发生着巨大变化,尤其是从计划经济到市场经济转轨带来人们价值观念、行为方式的变化,使得行为人的个体行为往往借助群体力量而达到犯罪目的,由此有组织犯罪呈现增长趋势。犯罪形态的变化迫使侦查方式由对个体行为的被动侦查向有组织犯罪的主动侦控转变,侦查模式也相应发生变化。从主动侦查角度切入,对于分析研究有组织犯罪侦查策略具有重大的现实意义。     

非法拘禁作为战争罪在非国际武装冲突中适用的探究

作为国际法的一个分支，国际人道法旨在保护未参与或不再参与敌对行动的人员，并限制作战手段和方法的使用，因此。国际人道法也被称为战争法或武装冲突法。在国际人道法的传统理论观点中，非国际性武装冲突中的平民面对非法拘禁时不受人道法的保护。回顾1995年前南国际法庭上诉庭在塔迪奇一案中的判决所建立的标准，无论是国际武装冲突还是非国际性武装冲突保，面对非法拘禁时，平民均应受到人道法保护。     

改革开放三十年中国经济回顾

改革开放30年来，中国经济结构优化升级，产业升级，经济效益、节能环保快速发展，出口快速增长，出口结构逐步升级，国内生产总值快速增长，经济效益显著提高，财政收入加速增长，呈现健康发展的局面。     

经侦民警职业化培训中案例教学的探索与实践

当前经侦执法中的新情况新问题层出不穷，加强经侦民警职业化培训，不断提高经侦队伍职业化水平已成为各级公安机关经侦部门队伍建设的一项重要任务。案例教学是理论与实践的有机结合体，具有直观生动、浅显易懂；源于实战、贴近实战和便于互动、易于参与的优势，是一项有效的教学手段。将案例教学运用于经侦民警职业化培训，精选真实案例作为教学与训练的素材，采取多种教学形式，带动全警参训，使教学与练兵相得益彰，能够有效地锻炼与提高经侦民警的职业能力，促进经侦专业警种的职业化建设。     

对“技术侦查”价值关联的思考——兼论技术侦查手段的必要性

技术侦查手段在侦查实践中得以广泛使用,具有重要的侦查价值。对技术侦查的研究不能囿于其概念本身,也不能基于理想化的人权保障理念而脱离侦查实际片面强调对技术侦查的限制。应坚持价值中立的态度,从价值关联的角度去考量技术侦查手段的必要性。     

Overview of: “Crime Place and Pollution: Expanding Crime Reduction Options Through a Regulatory Approach”

Research Summary Crime reduction policy has focused almost exclusively on offenders. Recent studies and evaluations show that expanding our policy portfolio to include places may be highly productive. We show that there is considerable research showing that crime is concentrated at a relatively few locations, that high-crime places are stable, that changing places can reduce crime, that displacement is not only far from inevitable but also less likely than the diffusion of crime prevention benefits, and that owners of high-crime places can be held accountable for the criminogenic conditions of their locations. We link these findings to environmental policy, where environmental scientists, economists, and regulators have developed a broad set of regulatory options. The core of this article describes a portfolio of environmental policy instruments directly applicable to crime places. We also discuss major decisions local governments will need to make to implement various forms of regulation, and we list challenges that governments must anticipate in planning for such implementation. We argue that a regulatory approach to crime places has the potential to lower the cost to taxpayers of reducing crime by shifting costs from governments to the relatively few place owners whose actions create crime-facilitating conditions. Policy Implications Taking a regulatory approach to crime places substantially expands the crime policy options under consideration. Regulatory options may increase local governments’ effectiveness at reducing crime while reducing governments’ costs. This is because regulatory approaches have the potential to shift some portion of the financial burden for crime fighting to owners of criminogenic locations. Policy makers can select between means-based anticrime regulations that focus on how place owners manage their locations and ends-based regulations that focus on the number of crimes allowed at places. Both of these approaches contain several alternative regulatory instruments, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Experimenting with various regulatory instruments could lead to the development of a range of new crime reduction policies. In addition, a regulatory approach has implications for the funding of policy research. Means-based regulatory instruments require governments to develop evidence that the means they regulate have the desired impact on crime. Ends-based regulatory instruments shift this burden to the regulated places.     

试论故意毁坏财物罪的客观方面及犯罪对象

故意毁坏财物罪的客观方面的描述和解读在美、英、德、日及我国学术界都有所区别,其要点在于对毁坏的解释不同。我国学术界的通说与实践中的认定仍有距离,应当将毁坏解读为毁弃、损坏,这样能将抛弃、隐匿等典型的情形囊括进来。本罪的犯罪对象中关于如何具体理解财物的含义,也存在不少的争议,这里也试图对本罪中财物的内涵提出了一些看法。