新型工业化道路基本要素初探

资本、人力资源和知识是新型工业化道路的三个基本要素。资本是现实生产力各要素的凝聚物,人和知识是新型工业化道路的最活跃因素,三者相辅相成,具有鲜明的共生性特点。     

法律是什么?——一个安排秩序的分类体系

从人类学的角度看,法律是一个安排秩序的分类体系,它安排了事物、行为、意义的秩序。每个社会、每种文化都有它与众不同的分类体系,由此产生了作为“地方性知识”的法律的多元格局。地方性规范比国家法律容纳了更富多元性的人们对人生意义的思考等非技术性意义因素,法律多元因此不可避免。不同的分类体系之间的差异会导致法律冲突的发生,但是作为不同分类体系的国家法律与地方性规范之间仍然有可沟通性。对于国家的法治建设来讲,不是如何去消除多元法律,而是如何处理差别。     

作为知识社会学个案的我国“法律文化”研究

学界在谈论法律文化研究在我国兴起的原因之时,多将其归咎于国外法律文化研究的引入,这固然不错,但笔者以为,恐怕更深层次的原因还在于特定时代背景下的现实需求使然;法律文化研究在我国的出现,是基于特定“社会居所”的现实欲求和历史思索以及学术共同体内部渴望打破旧有研究格局的需要等多重诱因作用的结果,国外法律文化研究的传入,某种意义上仅仅是开放了法学界希望从更为广阔的角度来理解和解说法律实践的特定接受趋向,同时赋予国内的法律文化研究一种“学术合法性的追认”,并未产生太大实质性学术影响。     

与贸易有关的知识产权协议与甘肃工业强省战略

与贸易有关的知识产权协议的实施给甘肃工业强省战略提出了有力挑战 ,加强知识产权法律制度建设对于促进甘肃工业强省战略目标的实现至为关键。     

知识在法学教育中的属性与效用——兼论我国法学教育知识观的重构

知识在法学教育中处于中心的地位,是法学教育培养学生法律素养的主要途径。不同种类的知识在对学生法律素养培育中的功用是不同的。因此,如何在法学教育中合理配置专业知识和非专业知识、国内法知识和外国法知识、方法知识和规范知识、事实知识和价值知识的比例尤为重要。我国法学教育改革的迫切任务之一就是正确理解不同种类知识的功用,并据此重构我国法学教育的知识观。     

THE TWELVE PEOPLE WHO SAVED REHABILITATION: HOW THE SCIENCE OF CRIMINOLOGY MADE A DIFFERENCE

Three decades ago, it was widely believed by criminologists and policymakers that “nothing works” to reform offenders and that “rehabilitation is dead” as a guiding correctional philosophy. By contrast, today there is a vibrant movement to reaffirm rehabilitation and to implement programs based on the principles of effective intervention. How did this happen? I contend that the saving of rehabilitation was a contingent reality that emerged due to the efforts of a small group of loosely coupled research criminologists. These scholars rejected the “nothing works” professional ideology and instead used rigorous science to show that popular punitive interventions were ineffective, that offenders were not beyond redemption, and that treatment programs rooted in criminological knowledge were capable of meaningfully reducing recidivism. Their story is a reminder that, under certain conditions, the science of criminology is capable of making an important difference in the correctional enterprise, if not far beyond.     

侵犯知识产权刑事案件若干法律问题探讨

依据最高两院《关于办理侵犯知识产权刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》,科学认定“非法经营数额”、“销售金额”和“违法所得数额”是审理侵犯知识产权刑事案件准确定罪量刑的关键。同时,还应当注意区分侵犯知识产权犯罪与生产、销售伪劣产品犯罪之间及侵犯知识产权具体犯罪之间的牵连、竞合关系。从完善立法的角度考虑,严格限定侵犯商业秘密有关犯罪的犯罪对象、规范侵犯知识产权刑事案件的管辖权也是需要注意的问题。     

Biotic Carbon Sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol: The Construction of Global Knowledge by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

This paper explores the dynamics of the production of global knowledge by an international knowledge organization, in this case the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Based on previous notions of international boundary organizations, the idea of international knowledge organizations emphasizes the knowledge generation function of such organizations rather than their convening function. Using the case of controversial Kyoto Protocol biotic carbon sequestration policies, I argue that boundary work and uncertainty management are the essential dynamics in the successful construction of global knowledge by international knowledge organizations. This uncertainty management occurs in a manner broadly, although not completely, in conformance with the institutional preferences of powerful policy actors. Global knowledge can legitimate and help refine global policies, but the process of its construction must be iterative and transparent if it is to be credible for global environmental governance over the long-term.     

Cognizance and Consultation of Randomized Controlled Trials among Ministerial Policy Analysts

Consultation of scientific evidence by policy actors has been the foci of attention of knowledge utilization scholars for decades. The present study questioned the extent to which randomized controlled trials (RCTs)—generally seen as the gold standard of scientific research—are known and consulted by policy analysts in ministerial settings. Using cross‐sectional data collected in 17 ministries in Québec (Canada), our study showed that fairly high levels of policy analysts report never having heard of RCTs, thus possibly hindering effective communication of scientific results to relevant policy makers. Statistical analyses reveal the importance of cognitive factors in explaining both phenomena.