论知识社会背景下的守法精神

守法精神对于现代法治具有基础性和前提性意义.在知识社会的背景下,法律的知识化发展有利于社会成员主体性意识的形成,有利于良法的创制和法律知识的传播,而这都为守法精神的生成提供了良好的条件.知识社会背景下守法精神的生成需要从法律制度建构中的知识转化、法律教育中的知识传播、法律实践中的知识升华等方面着手进行.     

Equality and Human Rights Commission: A Decade in the Making

This article traces the origins of the Commission over the decade before it opened its doors in October 2007, and the contentious debates and political trade-offs which led to its emergence in its current form; a history which throws light on the challenges it now faces. Inclusion of human rights in a 'single equality body', concessions on disability, the promise of a single Equality Act and the Commission's third arm, community relations, were major fault lines in debates complicated by devolution and fragmentation of responsibility in Whitehall but strengthened by an unusual degree of engagement with external stakeholders and by the scrutiny of the Joint Committee on Human Rights in Parliament. The outcome extends beyond establishment of a Commission with a powerful mandate. A process that began with separate equality interests competing to ensure their constituency did not lose out, fostered enthusiasm for collaboration to achieve the vision of society the Commission is tasked, by S3 Equality Act 2006, to deliver.'     

学术：高校分类的重要视角

学术界关于高校的分类如此繁多，以至于许多高校尤其新兴高校在实践中难于对自身准确定位甚至形成错位发展。究其原因，一方面在于已有分类并非基于高校本质进行，另一方面在于分类者所处知识型与新兴知识型之间存有冲突。因此，找寻高校之本质、建构适切于新兴知识型的高校分类体系成为当务之急。学术为高校之本质，基于学术对高校分类具有合理性。以学术为视角，高校可分类为普通型本科院校和应用型本科院校。     

民间法研究与批判精神

民间法研究反映了中国学术的进步,也反映了对法律发展动力的一种新认识。上世纪80年代民间法在国家—社会框架、地方性知识理论和法律多元理论支配下进行的研究,以及新世纪10年来就纠纷解决功能的探讨等,无不反映了民间法研究通过对移植式立法在实施过程中碰到的窘境的剖析,以批判性意识确立起自身独特的反思和批判精神。民间法研究的深入发展必须要回到民间法研究的既有立场上。     

知识产权国际公约与我国知识产权法律的改革与发展

我国加入WTO已经将近十年。作为WTO重要的一项协定TRIPs，在这十年阎受到多方挑战和质疑，有来自传统知识的。也有来自最新的互联网。本文在阐述了国际知识产权公约以及我国知识产权法律体系的发展历程的基础上，深入分析了知识产权体系在当前所面临的多方挑战和未来发展趋势。并对我国知识产权法律的多次修订作了相应的解说。对于即将进行的商标法第三次修订作了前瞻性分析。     

高新技术发展对世界经济的影响

高新技术及其产业的发展对世界经济的影响是多方面的高新技术产业已经成为经济发展的第一生产力,正在成为主导产业,改变了世界经济,导致了知识经济.在未来社会发展中,谁拥有的高新技术最多,谁也就取得了未来经济社会的领先地位.     

信息社会化给政府决策带来的机遇和挑战

本文对政府部门的决策结构与信息结构进行分析的基础上 ,阐述了由于社会的高度信息化使产业结构日益朝着技术密集与知识密集的方向发展 ,这种趋势使经济结构正逐步建立在以现代科学技术知识为基础的新的技术体系上。在以电子计算机为物质基础的新的经济结构中 ,信息社会化是社会逐步进入知识经济时代的外部特征。社会的高度信息化 ,使政府部门在决策方面所面临的是机遇和挑战并存的双重局面。     

论知识创新的能力

知识创新能力是主体依靠知识进步改进现实世界的活动能力,是主体各种能力整合而成的一种能力,包括创造、传播和应用知识的能力,结合、转化和扩散知识资源的能力等.知识创新能力是在人的认识与实践活动中建构起来的,是社会的能力,这种能力也有自己的历史限度.     

Managerial Tacit Knowledge,Individual Performance,and the Moderating Role of Employee Personality

This study investigates the relationship between knowledge-sharing mechanisms, managerial tacit knowledge, and individual performance in the Malaysian public sector. Moderation effects of employee personality on these variables were also examined. Findings from 308 Malaysian public sector managers suggest that individual performance is influenced by levels of accumulated managerial tacit knowledge (LAMTK), which were moderated by employee personality traits. The findings also show that individual performance has an impact on the effectiveness of knowledge-sharing mechanisms.     

The Role of Policy Labs in Policy Experiment and Knowledge Transfer: A Comparison across the UK,Denmark, and Singapore

Abstract

Policy labs have been increasingly used to generate scientific evidence and political momentum to boost policy experiments, but our understanding of the conditions for knowledge creation and transfer through policy experiments in the labs is scarce. This paper compares the UK’s Cabinet Office’s Behavioral Insights Team (BIT), Denmark’s the Danish MindLab, and Singapore’s the Human Experience Lab (THE Lab) to identify their similarities and differences in fostering policy experiment and knowledge transfer. It is found that BIT as the “Nudge Unit” is keen on bringing in rigorous scientific evidence to advocate effective albeit controversial policies, critical to its survival and influence in an adversarial political circumstance. MindLab takes more initiative to co-create and run projects together with agencies and organizations. THE Lab is dedicated to gleaning ethnographic insights from various stakeholders to support design thinking in policy implementation. These discernable differences can be attributed to their different political regimes and policy environments, which suggest workable avenues for policy labs in other countries.