将现代企业绩效考核理念融入边检机关绩效考核的探讨

边检机关的绩效管理尚处于绩效考核阶段,而且现行的绩效考核存在诸多问题,特别是未建立完善一个标准的绩效考核指标体系。将企业绩效管理的理论引入边检机关的绩效管理中,特别是应用企业绩效管理的方法(BSC与KPI),融入发展性评价的理念,结合边检机关的自身特点,建构边检机关绩效考核指标体系,并在此基础上将现行单纯的绩效考核引向系统的绩效管理,建立边检机关绩效管理系统,这能对边检机关绩效管理提供借鉴。     

免费“110”电话制度绩效分析——政府经济学角度

"110"电话是公安部门服务人民的一个重要的途径,也是政府服务职能的体现。"110"电话的建立极大地方便了群众,有利于维护社会秩序,保护人民安全,预防犯罪的发生。然而"110"电话作为免费公共资源,无效报警电话已经越来越常见,造成了公共资源的浪费,严重影响了"110"正常职能的行使。由此,试从经济学的角度分析"110"这种"公共池塘"悲剧产生的原因,并从经济学的角度提出相应的解决方案。     

重塑司法解释体制、助力法治中国建设——完善现行司法解释体制的几点思考

经过新中国成立以来60多年的不断探索,我国目前已经初步形成了"二元一级"的司法解释体制,这一体制的形成和完善对于建立健全中国特色社会主义法律体系、推动社会主义法治国家建设无疑起到了不可估量的作用。完善现行司法解释体制,应当逐步规范现行司法解释体制,强化立法解释,有条件的引入判例制并建立健全司法解释监督机制。     

中国古代官吏的考核制度及其启示

在我国公务员管理制度中,公务员考核制度是核心。而中国古代官吏考核制度,经过秦汉两朝的发展,至唐宋明清时,已经走向了完备化,形成一套严密的组织系统、考核标准和对各类不同职务官吏提出不同需求、分类考核以及考核与奖惩相结合的方法,对奖勤罚懒、扬善排恶、激励官吏勤政廉洁,起到一定的积极作用。研究中国古代官吏考核制度,对完善我国公务员考核制度和今天的选人用人具有重要的意义。     

实施《天津市企业工资集体协商条例》的若干实践与思考

天津市滨海新区大港区域实践《天津市企业工资集体协商条例》的体会,主要为下列"八项注意":第一是注意分类对待;第二是注意心中有"数";第三是注意多元维权;第四是注意动态管理;第五是注意统筹兼顾;第六是注意轻重有别;第七是注意个性化和行业标准化相结合;第八是注意工资协商时点的统一性和灵活性。     

隐性双轨制：刑法中保安处分的教义学阐释

我国现行法律中虽无保安处分的概念,但在刑法中已实质性地存在保安处分,其与刑罚共同构成刑法所规定的法律后果,由此形成“隐性双轨制”的格局。对保安处分规范的识别,首先应从与罪责的关系上、目的与功能的差异上明晰刑罚与保安处分的基本界分,进而从法律特征上区分刑罚规范与保安处分规范,最终将现行刑法中的保安处分措施“挖掘”出来。澄清现行刑法中保安处分措施的性质和法律地位,有利于确保这类措施的正当适用,同时也有利于保障个人的基本权利免受不当干涉。     

Attitudes towards sex offenders regarding competency,liability, voluntariness of offence,and disposal: the influence of being classified as having a learning disability

Abstract

The principal aim of this study was to investigate whether attitudes towards judicial competency, legal liability, voluntariness of offence and judicial disposal options were influenced by known classification of an offender as learning disabled compared to an offender with a suggested intellectual disability, but not formally classified. Subsidiary aims were to explore participant attitudes based upon group membership and parental status. The sample consisted of 101 participants (69 undergraduate nursing students and 32 from the general population). Participants were requested to complete a questionnaire assessing their attitudes within the aforementioned domains and towards ascribed levels of victim parental responsibility. Fifty participants completed a questionnaire designed for the purpose of the study where the offence scenario depicted made reference to the offender having a formal classification of learning disability. Fifty-one participants completed the same questionnaire where an intellectual disability was suggested but not formally stated in the form of classification. Results indicated that classification did significantly influence attitudes in most domains irrespective of group. The nursing group attributed greater levels of competency to the offenders depicted. No interactions between variables were observed. The reasons for and implications of these findings, limitations and recommendations for future research are explored.     

Reduction in Force—Benefit or Detriment? A Look at Some Tangible and Intangible Results of Federal Sector Reductions in Force (RIF)

Abstract

Through a review of some of the tangible and intangible results of Federal reduction in force (RIF), this article demonstrates that while the use of RIF procedures has resulted in a smaller Federal civilian workforce, it is a cumbersome and expensive process which negatively impacts the reputation of the Federal government as an employer. At one time, the Federal government was a model, progressive employer. Repeated RIFs have made the government a less desirable employer. This is an important loss, not only to Federal employees, but to the entire American workplace. If government cannot attract and retain a quality workforce in a stable environment, then critical programs cannot help but be negatively impacted.     

刑事诉讼专家辅助人出庭的观点争议及其解决思路

我国2012年修改的《刑事诉讼法》和《民事诉讼法》对“有专门知识的人”的规定相当简略,尤其是其出庭“适用鉴定人的有关规定”表述．不仅存在“有专门知识的人”是作为专家证人还是专家辅助人之争论．而且还引发是否有必要界定为中立的鉴定人诉讼地位之分歧。基于此．“有专门知识的人”参与法庭是否需要准入限制、法庭如何行使审查权限以及是否适用回避制度、其权利义务如何确定、如何在法庭上进行质证、其质证的效力如何以及在法庭上应安排何种位置等问题需要理论予以澄清．而理论需要结合我国司法制度与诉讼制度的要求及其功能作出具有规范意义的诠释．     

Nail-biters and no-contests: The effect of electoral margins on satisfaction with democracy in winners and losers

Previous scholarship has found robust connections between winning an election and democratic system support. Building on this connection, our analysis theorizes an additional dimension of competitiveness existing in executive elections. We hypothesize a polarizing effect in close elections: that individuals feel the most satisfied after winning by a narrow margin, while losers will be most dissatisfied. Using survey data from eighteen national elections across eight countries, our findings support half of this expectation. Winner satisfaction with democratic systems is highest in close elections and erodes as margin increases. Losers' reported satisfaction is not affected by margin – those who lose by half a percent are indistinguishable in levels of system support from those who lose in landslides.