某市城区餐饮业餐饮具消毒管理干预效果评价

目的：评价某市城区餐饮业餐饮具消毒管理干预效果,为建立该市餐饮业餐饮具消毒长效监管机制提供决策依据。方法：采用实验流行病学研究方法,对某市城区2012年度餐饮具抽检不合格的88家餐饮单位进行干预。干预项目包括餐饮具消毒间改造、消毒设施设备配备、消毒管理、人员管理等方面的10项措施,并对干预措施效果进行评价。结果：与干预前相比,干预后被干预单位的餐饮具消毒间配置率、专间专用率、卫生状况合格率、消毒与保洁设施合格率、消毒制度建立率、消毒流程合格率及人员管理等方面都均得到明显提高,餐饮具的抽检合格率也由57.73%提高到87.05%。结论：该市餐饮具消毒管理干预效果较好,为建立长效监管机制提供依据,为其他类似地区提供借鉴经验。     

关于刑事侦查阶段司法介入问题的探讨

侦查权作为刑事诉讼中的一项重要权力,其运行的过程和结果不仅影响到犯罪嫌疑人的人身、财产权利,更是我国程序合法化的重要窗口.检察机关由于其作为追诉机关的法定性质,决定了其很难在根本上控制侦查机关的违法侦查行为.借鉴相关国家关于侦查权司法控制的立法经验,构建我国刑事侦查阶段司法介入制度,从介入的主体、范围和方式三方面进行尝试,以实现我国侦查权在合法的轨道上运行.     

声音模拟训练对警体射击心理状态的影响

选取警察学院平行2个班级70人为研究对象,利用声音模拟训练进行3个月的分组实验干预。选择焦虑、心理疲劳以及心境指标对学员心理干预效果进行评价。结果表明,实验组学员比对照组学生心理疲劳降低明显;心境状态比对照组学生更加稳定,表现在TMD、紧张、愤怒、抑郁和慌乱明显降低;实验组学生比对照组学生认知状态焦虑更低,通过实验心理调控后,心理疲劳、心境状态和焦虑状态都较好地改善,个性调节促进了实验组学员射击时的心理状态,提高射击运动技能。     

论高空抛坠物侵权案件中公安机关的调查权

为解决高空抛坠物侵权案件中侵权人查找难题,我国《民法典》第1254条第3款为公安机关增设了调查权。该调查权应当被定性为侵权调查权,不同于公安机关固有的治安调查权和刑事侦查权。作为我国《民法典》中的公法规范,调查权条款的正当性不仅源于理论层面的积极面向的辅助原则,更在于其对权利保障的现实意义。高空抛坠物致人损害行为的复合属性与公安机关兼具行政机关与司法机关的双重定位导致侵权调查权与治安调查权和刑事侦查权难免竞合,这对公安机关提出了新的要求。该调查权条款的适用主要产生两个法律效果:一是受害人的调查义务转移到了公安机关,前者的调查义务得以免除;二是“依法及时”和“查清责任人”的目标指向引发了调查不作为的认定问题。     

驾驶行为干预体系在交通管理中的应用

机动车驾驶人良好的驾驶习惯与交通安全和交通秩序之间有着密切的联系,本文采用随机抽样方法,通过专门设计的问卷,共调查了155名机动车驾驶人,收集驾驶人的基本特征、交通安全认知、驾驶行为习惯等相关情况。通过收集的资料,应用团体教育的方式进行驾驶行为干预,规范其驾驶行为,提高驾驶人交通安全意识,减少交通不安全因素,形成良好的交通秩序。     

学校管理司法介入的限度

由于学生基本权利的不可侵犯性与学校自主管理的教育规律,司法介入公立学校管理存在一定的限度。这具体表现为三个方面:涉及基本权利的管理行为方属于司法介入范围;复议前置程序是司法介入的前提条件;程序审查是司法审查的主要标准。只有如此,学校管理、学生权利与司法独立三者之间才能保持良性互动。     

评美国反基因歧视法律实践及其启示

为防治基因技术的滥用和基因信息歧视,以《2008年禁止基因信息歧视法》为代表的美国联邦和州立法积极实施干预,以确保所有人雇佣机会平等、享有平等健康保险待遇,全面参与社会生活.美国反基因歧视法内容详尽,既禁止基因信息歧视行为,又兼顾保险公司、雇主的合理要求以及避免可能给第三人及公众带来的风险,使违法行为几乎“无缝隙可钻”,且法律对公立雇主的要求高于私立雇主.美国反基因歧视法律实践,对于我们客观认识和把握平等权,完善相关立法和公共政策,具有一定启迪.     

Race relations,nationalism and the humanitarian Rohingya crisis in contemporary Myanmar

ABSTRACT

The recent ethnic tensions in Myanmar especially in the Rakhine state has once again placed the country onto the centre stage of global media attention. The aim of this paper is to look at race relations in contemporary Myanmar with a special focus on the Rohingya community. The paper argues that problematic race relations in the country today should be analysed within a certain historical context and should be seen as part of a historical continuum. This paper places a lot of importance on this historical continuum. In this connection, the British colonial policies of divide and conquer, politicians and their obsession with Buddhism and trying to make it the state religion shortly after independence in 1948, and the xenophobic policies followed by the military junta after 1962 deserve special mention. The paper further argues that the current state of affairs and escalation in violence has happened recently because of the convergence of the activities and ideologies of certain political groups like the military junta, the National League for Democracy, the Arakan League for Democracy, and the role played by certain Buddhist extremist groups like the MaBaTha in Burmese politics. To ease the existing tension in the Rakhine, the central government would need to take a more federally minded approach and introduce meaningful democracy and development in the frontier parts of the country where there is a strong ethnic minority presence.     

Terrorism Analysis and Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project: The Missing Element

ABSTRACT

The decision in the case of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project raised important issues about civil liberties in the United States (2010), including freedom of speech and freedom of association, in relation to U.S. foreign policy actions. While the decision has the potential to infringe on certain liberties, the decision itself was based on very limited information on the nature of terrorism, the foreign terrorist organizations involved, and the processes by which terrorist groups can be induced to peacefully re-enter domestic political systems. There are also concerns about what can be the arbitrary designation of groups as foreign terrorist organizations. These issues raise serious questions about the role of the Supreme Court in the overall political system and judgments in cases involving terrorism and foreign policy.     

State intervention and neoliberalism in the globalizing world economy: lessons from Singapore's regionalization programme

The recent 1997-98 Asian economic crisis has thrown Asia's divergent pathways to development into serious question. Protagonists of neoliberalism argue that their agenda is now becoming a global orthodoxy when several ailing Asian economies have accepted IMF packages which come with neoliberal economic programmes. Drawing on lessons from Singapore's regionalization programme, this article contends that it is far too early to conclude that Asian developmental states are giving up their governance of domestic economies. Instead, there is evidence that these Asian developmental states are re-regulating their domestic economies to ride out of the economic crisis. The article first starts with the debate between neoliberalism and state developmentalism in our understanding of global political economy. It then examines the political economy of Singapore's regionalization programme through which Singapore-based transnational corporations are strongly encouraged by the state to regionalize their operations, followed by a critical discussion of the impact of the recent Asian economic crisis on the re-regulation of the regionalization programme by the state in Singapore. Some lessons for Asian emerging economies are suggested in the concluding section.