谈计算机犯罪的侦查与取证

为严厉打击计算机犯罪,有必要着力研究计算机犯罪的概念和特点,利用科学的手段确立计算机犯罪的形式,采取有力的措施进行侦查与取证。     

试论我国商标犯罪中的商标范围

对商标犯罪对象的甄选 ,反映了立法者的认识能力、立法时的犯罪态势以及立法者对社会利益的综合衡量。目前我国刑法中商标犯罪的犯罪对象均为注册商标 ,对未注册商标不予保护。在注册服务商标的保护方面 ,我国刑法仍然存在漏洞。借鉴WTO规则以及其他国家和地区的相关规定 ,结合我国商标犯罪的现状及发展趋势 ,进一步扩大商标犯罪之“商标”范围。但同时应注意刑事司法应当恪守罪刑法定原则 ,不能超越刑事立法任意扩大犯罪圈。     

当代刑法溯及力原则的考察--试对新刑法第12条理论重构

刑法的溯及力的出发点和归宿是人权保障 ,是相对罪刑法定精神的体现。肯定我国刑法从旧兼从轻的溯及力原则的基础上 ,引入外国立法例阐释溯及力与既判力的关系 ,进一步完善我国刑法溯及力的立法。     

"被害人自愿"与诈骗罪认定

行为人通过实施欺诈手段取得财产的行为不一定构成诈骗犯罪。诈骗犯罪中的欺诈手段和其他侵犯财产罪中实施的欺诈手段的根本区别是 :诈骗犯罪中的欺诈手段使被害人产生错误认识 ,其基于意志自由“自愿交付”财产。区分诈骗罪与盗窃、抢夺、抢劫、敲诈勒索等其他以实施欺诈手段侵犯财产的犯罪 ,必须从被害人在受到欺诈时的认识因素和意志因素两个方面来进行。     

再析侵占罪的几个问题

自新刑法颁布以来,刑法学界对侵占罪的相关问题一直有较大争议,司法实践中在认定侵占罪时标准也各不相同。     

对当前国际警务合作方式的探讨

国际警务合作是跨国界的执法活动,一国警察可以跨越国境在另一国行使侦查权。我国应　　在国际刑警组织的框架内开展国际警务合作,运用国际侦查协作、刑事司法协助等警务合作方式与有关　　国家开展合作。     

关于东北亚国际航运中心竞争策略

研究国际航运中心的发展历史,从中发现它的发展变化规律,对于我们正确认识现代国际航运中心的本质特征有着十分重要的意义。目前青岛、天津、大连在认定国际航运中心竞争对手问题上就需要调整思路,从长期考虑,在竞争中如何处理这三个大港,以及各自临近较小港口的发展关系问题。根据国际经验,港口联盟是一个很好的合作途径。为应对船舶大型化及航运公司的全球联盟,并避免港口之间对同一腹地的过度竞争而导致设施过剩,世界上许多港口都实行了战略联盟、兼并等多种合作。     

吉林省参与图们江区域国际合作开发的问题与对策

以多国合作为特征的图们江区域经济合作开发项目近几年有了实质性的进展,各成员国加强了务实开发的力度。中朝“路港区”工程、中俄“路港关”工程、中蒙“两山”工程等开始启动,并有了一个较好的开端。但对于吉林省来讲,当前又遇到了对外通道未能真正顺利打开、跨国边境经济合作区没有形成完整的互动机制、市场贸易主体也未得到真正确立等问题。为此应加快推进图们江区域国际经济合作。     

A Comparison of Four Presumptive Tests for the Detection of Blood on Dark Materials

Detection of blood on dark materials is difficult for crime scene examiners so presumptive tests are used to assist. This study compared the ability of luminol, leuko crystal violet, tetramethylbenzidine, and Combur Test®E to detect whole, diluted blood (1:100) and a key‐shaped blood transfer stain (1:10), on dark cotton sheeting, tea towel, socks, synthetic carpet, and car mats. Powdered bleach was used to evaluate specificity of the blood detection tests. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall misclassification rate (OMR) assessed the quality of the blood tests. Luminol was the preferred test for diluted blood having the highest sensitivity (79%–96%), NPV (66%–93%), and the lowest OMR (3%–15%). Luminol was also found to be most efficient with a testing time on 25 items of 2 h 50 min compared with up to 8 h. Overall, luminol was the most effective method, also providing information on bloodstain patterns.     

Globalization and regulatory change: The interplay of laws and technologies in E-commerce in Southeast Asia

Electronic commerce has brought about business and technological changes globally, and these global changes have given rise to major legal reforms across nations. In the fast-changing global digital economy, states need strategies to maintain competitiveness of their markets while simultaneously ensuring the secure and effective use of technologies involved in conducting electronic transactions. This paper examines how the use and recognition of electronic signatures are regulated in Southeast Asia – the region that has shown the most significant growth in global e-commerce in past few years. Based on a comparative analysis of the laws of four representative ASEAN member states – namely Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and Vietnam, this paper argues that there is a regional trend towards adopting more liberal and technology-neutral standards for electronic signatures. Electronic signature regulation in Southeast Asia is now built upon limited technological neutrality (or the so-called “two-tiered” approach) as a shared regulatory understanding, but this approach is operationalized differently in each state due to distinctive national contexts. Within the common legal framework, each state has developed its own system of control and management with respect to higher-level signatures (using advanced technologies). The principle of technological neutrality, a concept originally developed for the regulation of technologies in response to the liberalization of telecommunications market, has been the central theme of discussions on the e-transactions policy-making scene. As the author shows, in the process through which states localize the global standards of technological neutrality, ASEAN as a vehicle of regulatory change has played an essential role in translating this principle to the national context.