国际航空运输事故产品责任法律适用论要

航空产品缺陷是国际航空运输事故的成因之一,一旦发生此类事故,其损害赔偿是受害者最为关切的问题。受害者为了获得有效和充分赔偿将面临如何选择法律,选择何国法律来追究相关人员责任的问题。航空产品责任的界定以及航空运输权利义务主体间的关系具有特殊性,伴有合同和侵权法律关系且常交织在一起。目前,我国还没有关于调整涉外产品责任法律适用的专门法律制度,但在立法体例和具体法律适用的立法规定方面,可根据我国的实际情况,对涉外产品责任的法律适用予以完善。     

Double Lives, Double Narratives: Tracing the Story of the Family in Rousseau, the Swiss Civil Code and the Fathers’ Rights Debates

A recent parliamentary postulate in Switzerland calling for joint custody as the legal norm argues that fathers are discriminated against in Swiss divorce law. This postulate has incited a debate which circles around issues of equality, the role of fathers and mothers, and the good of the child. Our article, uniting approaches from literature, cultural studies, and science and technology studies, examines the arguments sparked by the debate with a view to different takes on gender and family. In doing so, it traces the roots of contemporary Swiss family law in the Rousseauian narrative of family life in Emile ou de l’education; it explores the manner in which scientific knowledge is marshaled to lend political legitimacy to current debate; and it asks finally how narrative bridges the gap between public discourse and lived experience.

加强城郊结合部犯罪控制的几点思考

城郊结合部外来人口多,人员流动频繁,是大城市案件多发、大案频发的地带.控制城郊结合部犯罪必须控制好几类严重刑事犯罪活动,如突发性、动态性犯罪,连续性犯罪,团伙犯罪及流窜犯罪等.     

意思自治、交易秩序与利益平衡——南怀瑾作品著作权纠纷上诉案评析

知识产权案件的裁判,应当体现意思自治的民法基本原则、稳定交易秩序的司法导向、平衡相关方利益的价值取向。对于行为人的真实意思,应当通过行为外观探求其内心真意。著作权许可使用合同的法律性质应综合合同条款文义、著作权人之行为、代理人之权限、出版合同及其履约过程进行判断。对于代理人在著作权人授权范围之内签署的许可使用合同,其法律后果应直接归属于作为被代理人的著作权人,而不应认定为转委托。著作权人死亡后,在对其作品著作财产权归属发生争议的情况下,被许可人暂缓支付著作权许可使用费,不存在拒不支付之主观过错,因此不应认定其构成侵权。对于权利人通过合同关系行使处分权已经构建的稳定交易结构及交易秩序,应予以尊重。     

共同受贿犯罪主体的认定

受贿罪共同犯罪主体的认定问题,不仅作为典型的共同犯罪问题而倍受关注,而且对当前惩治贿赂腐败,加强廉政建设具有重要的现实意义。结合刑法学共同犯罪理论及司法实践,对非国家工作人员能否成为共同受贿罪的主体,以及如何认定共同受贿犯罪的主体等问题进行深入探讨非常必要。     

整治假冒伪劣产品的法律对策--论产品责任法的完善

文章在国内产品责任法研究的基础上,根据法理学、民法学的基本理论,运用比较分析等方法,结合实际中案例研究,整理分析产品责任法的归责原则,并试图提出从立法和司法两个方面完善我国产品责任法律的意见及建议.     

共同正犯相关问题研究

作者探讨共同正犯的相关问题 ,提出共同正犯是共犯类型 ,并对国外刑法理论关于共同正犯理论的犯罪共同说、行为共同说和意思主体共同说进行了评析 ,提出了共同正犯成立的基本范围 ,分析了共同正犯的主观要件和实行行为形态 ,并就共谋共同实行行为、继承的共同实行行为、分担的共同实行行为等存在较大争议的问题进行分析 ,提出了自己观点。     

Securities laws ‘facilitating’ private enforcement

La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, and Shleifer (J Financ 61:1–32, 2006) (LLS) have undertaken an empirical analysis, making a critical but somewhat provocative proposition that “securities laws ‘facilitating’ private enforcement, rather than providing for public enforcement, benefit the securities market.” After briefly providing a theoretical connection to the existing law and economics literature, I attempt to empirically advance this LLS proposition two-fold, particularly on the ‘joint use of regulation and the liability rule,’ by exploring the most meaningful word ‘facilitate’ therein. Firstly, I explore the cross-country LLS data associated with the specific case of an initial public offering to seek possibly more solid evidence on the facilitating effect. Secondly, motivated by LLS, I pursue a within-country positive analysis, regarding the major determinants of the joint use, but across overall harmful activities covered in the Korean Securities Law. The major tenet underscoring this second empirical exploration was the clear message from the existing theoretical literature that the joint use should be adopted in a selective manner even within a single substantive statute, because it usually governs vastly different harmful activities. Finally, I call for some essential research agenda, prior to approving the ineffectiveness of public enforcement claimed in the second part of the LLS proposition.

Cooperation in the shadow of regulatory competition: the case of asylum legislation in Europe

Traditional analysis considers that the granting of protection to refugees is an international public good, and thus explains both the heterogeneousness in refugee protection in Europe and the spiral that has hardened the EU Member States’ asylum legislation from the mid-1980s onwards as the result of free riding in the provision of the good. In contrast, the paper considers that the heterogeneousness in refugee distribution is best explained by the joint product model and that the spiral of restriction is best explained by the common pool resource model and regulatory competition theory. The paper explains, and gives empirical evidence of the emergence and development of a competitive game among the EU Member States, and shows the result and the consequence of this upon cooperative attempts among States.     

论股东责任恒定制度的确立

股东有限责任制度被法学界的许多学者誉为公司“传统的奠基石”。然而，在这一制度的框架内，股东与债权人之间利益之不平衡是显而易见的，在工业文明起始阶段，此制度之创立无疑是人类之大幸，但社会经济发展到今天，仍固守传统的有限责任制度而不作些许更改，则颇有挑战公平、正义之意味，鉴于此，笔者隧原创性地提出“股东有限责任恒定”之议题，以便能使股东与债权人在“公平与效率”之间找到一个更为适度的契合点。但愿次文能起到抛砖引玉之功效。