政策过程理论的多维分析——以广州市“禁摩”政策为例

政策过程理论作为一种中层理论或中观理论在整个政策科学中占有重要的地位。本文以广州市的"禁摩"政策为个案,在厘清本土概念、掌握"禁摩"政策具体过程的基础上,是用这三种理论对该省会城市的"禁摩"政策过程进行逐一解读,并分别阐述三种理论的利与弊,并探讨我国政策过程理论的本土化特征与未来发展方向。     

论延安时期毛泽东的党性观

延安时期,毛泽东对党性理论做了深入的研究,形成了富有特色的党性观,贯穿于其中的一条红线,就是从世界观和方法论的方面研究党性,从唯物主义的高度分析党性。他强调一切从实际出发,理论联系实际,实事求是,是党性坚强的根本表现,否则就是没有党性或者是党性不全;从唯物主义世界观上增强党性必须反对主观主义、参加革命斗争实践、开展整党整风。     

延安时期中国共产党培养和造就干部的基本经验

努力培养和造就干部,是延安时期中国共产党领导的革命事业取得胜利的根本组织基础。延安时期,中国共产党始终围绕党的政治路线,用独创的整风方式坚持基层干部队伍建设、注重年轻干部和在职干部的培养、着重培养和造就高级领导干部。这是中国共产党对马列主义关于无产阶级政党组织建设理论辩证地吸取和继承、发展的必然结果,是延安时期中国共产党取得伟大胜利的组织保证,丰富和发展了马列主义关于无产阶级政党组织建设的理论。     

论党在延安时期的学习运动及其历史意义

中国共产党在延安时期发动了一场包括党、政、军、民、学的,民众团体中的工作干部和学校里的工作干部都在内的在职干部学习运动。这场学习运动的开展,是中共历史上提高干部理论素养、知识储备和工作能力的一次创造性的成功实践。它的开展对于中共冲破教条主义的束缚,卓有成效地推进党的建设“伟大的工程”发挥了极为重要的作用。     

A critical understanding of good governance and leadership concepts written in the context of the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) and the challenges to contextual discourse on Africa's development paradigms1

ABSTRACT

Good governance is a value-laden concept that is characteristically nebulous; it can mean different things to different people, depending on the context in which it is used. The same applies to leadership. Concepts, as Pauw (1999a, 465) puts it, are ‘tools of thinking’ and contexts are ‘the environments or frameworks in which they [concepts] operate’. Lucidity in the meanings of concepts is fundamentally important for shaping debate and enriching discourses. To maintain their power, concepts must be used in their proper contexts. This necessitates an understanding of the art of contextual discourse. Good governance is used in NEPAD as a principle and emphasised as a sine qua non for sustainable development in Africa. On the other hand, NEPAD premises Africa's re-birth or Renaissance on good governance and leadership, with a vision and commitment to repositioning the continent in global power balances. In this article good governance and leadership are considered as concepts. NEPAD is a textual context within which the two key concepts are used and should, consequently, be engaged. The article attempts a critical review of African scholarship engagement with good governance and leadership within the NEPAD context to determine the extent to which contextual discourse is practised. It further grapples with the immediate historical background to scholarship on Africa's development between the 1960s and early 1990s. The exercise reveals that much of the accumulated body of African scholarship and scholarship on Africa's development reviewed does not suffciently contextualise discourse on good governance and leadership within NEPAD, and its key assessment and monitoring device, the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM), and offers an alternative framework.