讯问客体语言的听解

讯问人员对犯罪嫌疑人语言的听解有着重要的作用。讯问时,讯问人员要认真听辨犯罪嫌疑人的供述,细致地识别其有声语言、类语言和无声语言。     

陈献章与惠能哲学思想之比较

陈献章和惠能是不同时代、不同流派的岭南思想家,两者之间的哲学思想有区别也有太多的相似性。就区别而言,主要体现为对终极价值认同的差异,一个走的是入世的心学之路,一个是即入世又出世的禅学之路。就相似而言,主要体现在心性论和修养论方面。两者的相似性证明了陈献章确实受到惠能的影响,尽管陈献章似乎从来没有提到过惠能。     

Forensic odontology lessons: multishooting incident at Port Arthur, Tasmania

On Sunday 28 April 1996 a lone gunman killed and injured many people at the historic penal settlement ruins at Port Arthur in South Eastern Tasmania, Australia. Thirty-two victims were shot dead and 19 were injured in a short time inside a cafe and along the roadway leading to the site entrance. The gunman then took one hostage to a nearby guest house which was occupied by a married couple. Police stood siege during the night. Early the next day the cottage began to burn and a man suspected to be the gunman eventually ran unarmed from the building with his clothes alight and was arrested. The house burned to the ground. Three bodies were later located in the burnt ruins.Forensic odontology played a role in the retrieval of evidence and identification of the incinerated victims. Lack of antemortem dental records for one victim necessitated the reliance on a single CT scan radiograph for matching with the remains. Fire scene procedures, evidence collection and other issues were reviewed.The overwhelming scale of this tragedy and its adverse effects on the Tasmanian community, especially the victims’ families and survivors, cannot be overestimated. While acknowledging this, it is important that lessons are learnt from tragedies such as these. This paper is presented with a view to assisting forensic odontologists in the investigation of complex incidents.     

身份认同:Cosplay亚文化的实践意义

Cosplay即角色扮演,是一种真人扮演动漫、游戏等文化产品中人物和情节的青少年游戏活动。在网络新媒体的助推下,Cosplay族群及其文化实践活动不断壮大,迅速成为当下社会一种无法忽视的青少年亚文化现象。戏剧性的人物扮演、易装和性别气质的颠覆、族群文化资本累积是Cosplay最为明显的文化表征,通过扮演、易装和设立族群边界的文化实践,青少年以独特的姿态戏谑、抵抗、颠覆父辈和社会主流价值观,完成理想自我和族群身份的认同。     

论“诊疗规范”在医疗过失认定中的作用——兼评《侵权责任法》第五十八条

＂诊疗规范＂在本质上是诊疗实践中的通常做法,或者惯常做法,是在临床实践中逐渐形成的专业常规。各国理论和司法实践均将其作为认定医疗过失的重要但非唯一标准,因此在认定医疗过失时还需参考其他因素。《侵权责任法》第五十八条中的＂诊疗规范＂是形式意义上的,而非实质意义上的,明确了这种区别就能够解释法律将其作为推定医务人员过失标准的深层原因。     

Trust in the proposed EU regulation on trust services?

A few months after ICRI's 20th anniversary conference the European Commission adopted on 4 June 2012 a draft regulation “on electronic identification and trusted services for electronic transactions in the internal market”. The proposed legal framework is intended to give legal effect and mutual recognition to trust services including enhancing current rules on e-signatures and providing a legal framework for electronic seals, time stamping, electronic document acceptability, electronic delivery and website authentication. Yet, this draft Regulation provokes many questions with regard to the implicit “trust” concept on which it is based. Starting from their experience in the EU FP7 uTRUSTit project (Usable Trust in the Internet of Things: www.utrustit.eu) and in other ICRI research projects, Jos Dumortier and Niels Vandezande have analyzed the proposed legislative text of the European Commission and wrote a few critical observations. Although obviously not presented at the conference in November 2011, it seemed worthwhile to add this contribution to its proceedings.     

论影响西部少数民族地区政治稳定的民族认同机制

民族认同机制由民族认同主体、民族认同客体和民族认同内容三要素组成;它在维护西部少数民族地区政治稳定方面发挥着十分重要的功能;要充分发挥民族认同机制在西部少数民族地区的政治稳定功能,就必须做好三个方面的工作：一是优化民族国家认同,奠定民族认同的血缘基础;二是优化民族关系认同,建立健全民族平等机制,搭建民族认同桥梁;三是优化民族自身认同,提升各少数民族自身综合素质。强化民族竞争力。     

论科学证据、专家证言、鉴定意见三者的关系

与科学证据有关的法律概念主要有大陆法的鉴定意见,以及英美法国家的专家证言。鉴定意见与专家证言之间,由于具有不同的证据法原理,不具有可比性。在英美法国家,科学证据应是专家证言的下位概念;在大陆法国家,科学证据与鉴定意见之间的关系,与鉴定的法律定位密切相关,要具体国家具体分析。明确这一点,有利于厘清我国科学证据的相关法律定位及其与鉴定意见之间的关系。     

城市融入、组织信任与农民工的社会信任——以对纺织服装业农民工的调查为例

研究8个城市24个纺织服装企业850个农民工的调查数据表明,农民工社会信任总体状态处于中间水平,其组织信任(组织系统信任和员工-管理者信任)和城市融入程度越高,社会信任程度也越高。以人际交往、人际交往感受为表征的城市融入之于社会信任的重要性,说明传统的信任途径依然具有现实意义。建基于企业社会责任制度安排与实践、制度认知和评价基础上的组织信任对于社会信任变异解释力说明了社会信任建构的制度影响。农民工的社会信任既是关系的,也是结构和制度的,其社会信任水平的提升,有赖于通过企业社会责任建设、法制建设提升组织系统信任和员工管理者信任,以及消弭社会排斥使农民工更好地融入当地社会。     

二元制抑或一元制：医疗纠纷鉴定模式的选择

医疗（事故）纠纷因专门性问题源于医疗事故技术鉴定和司法鉴定的＂二元制＂鉴定模式,致使纠纷解决的法律在选择适用上出现不同的结果,并造成了同一事实的处理结果尤其是赔偿的数额差异甚巨。《侵权责任法》的实施能否终结＂二元制＂鉴定模式,使冲突的相关规定、解释、解答等相关文本在法律适用上归于统一再次成为颇具争论的问题。基于医疗事故技术鉴定与司法鉴定结果在证据性质上的同一,有必要将医疗事故技术＂鉴定＂仅作为行政程序的内容,并进一步建立解决医疗纠纷的鉴定机制,体现鉴定作为证据的＂认定＂功能,以便实现医疗行为共担风险以及利益平衡的基本目标。