中国共产党的三个历史决议与正确党史观的确立和发展

唯物史观是共产党人认识和把握人类社会发展规律的世界观和方法论,确立正确党史观就要以唯物史观为指导,运用辩证唯物主义与历史唯物主义认识和研究中国共产党的历史,从而得出正确的观点。中国共产党历来高度重视总结历史经验,在百年奋斗进程中形成了三个历史决议,一以贯之地坚持辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义的理论与方法:用具体历史的、客观全面的、联系发展的观点来看待党的历史,准确把握党的历史发展的主题主线、主流本质,正确对待党在前进道路上的曲折;加强思想引导和理论辨析,澄清对党史中一些重大历史问题的模糊认识和片面理解;守正创新、正本清源、固本培元,系统总结党的历史经验。三个历史决议确立并不断丰富和发展了正确党史观。     

党内选举：一个必须重视的问题

党内选举是党内民主实施程度的标志,它保证党的各级组织内部权力来源的合法性 ;形成党内有效监督以规范党的各级领导班子和干部队伍建设 ;保证党员民主参与党内事务的管理。针对党内选举中存在的问题 ,应改革和完善党内选举的各项制度来保证党内选举的真正实现     

新加坡人民行动党政府的社会控制方式

本文从制度环境、制度安排、政策和策略等方面对新加坡执政的人民行动党及其政府如何处理与其它政党、社群组织和普通选民的关系和社会控制方式进行了分析。指出在制度设计上,它是一个存在一定程度多元制衡的一党独大的以行政为主导的软权威主义的政体。在处理与反对党的关系方面,执政党的基本原则是一方面对其严格限制和控制,采取一切“合法的”手段把其摒弃在国家权力之外,另一方面则保证其在一定程度上的发言权,以对执政党进行一定程度的监督、反映不同的利益和政见。在处理与社群组织和选民的关系方面,其基本原则是通过推行国家合作主义的政策把人民群众纳入执政党所设定的政治发展进程之中;实行一种具有多元利益表达和一定民主性的、提倡体制内合作的自上而下的制度;人民行动党在联系群众方面已经形成了高度制度化的联系机制,尤其是这种机制不是一味迎合人民群众的眼前需要,而是着眼于其长远利益。     

An analysis of the changing social bases of America's political parties: 1952–2008

In this article I address two interrelated questions: have the group bases of the American political parties changed over time and what factors have lead to the observed changes? I determine social group memberships significantly influence individual partisanship with a multivariate analysis using 56 years of ANES data. I then measure how many votes each politically relevant social group contributed to the party coalitions in each presidential election from 1952 to 2008. I discuss how group contributions have changed over time and establish the demographic and behavioral causes of group contribution change. I find that the party coalitions have been restructured as a result of groups' changing voting behavior and the changing ratio of groups in the electorate.     

网络时代背景下加强企业党建的思考

企业党建是党对经济建设领导的重要保障,网络时代的发展给企业党建工作带来挑战也带来了机遇。网络时代给企业党建带来的新挑战表现在：网络使企业党员思想受到冲击,给企业党建工作方式、企业党建工作理念带来考验和新要求;同时,网络时代也给企业党建创造了新机遇：网络丰富了企业党建工作的资源和内容,创建了企业党建工作交流的新平台,开辟了企业党建工作教育的新阵地。在网络时代背景下加强企业党建工作,就要积极推进企业基层党建工作队伍建设,拓展企业党建工作的新渠道,完善企业党建工作的运行机制。     

新时期加强党的纯洁性建设的思考

2013年是全面贯彻落实党的十八大精神的开局之年,扎实推进党风廉政建设和反腐败工作,对永葆党的纯洁性意义重大。本文主要从党的十八大及党的十八届三中全会对反腐倡廉建设的部署和要求,全面分析新形势腐败的新动向,总结腐败的原因,推动新的历史条件下反腐倡廉建设与党的纯洁性建设的思考,永葆党的纯洁性。     

Abe's Fall: Leadership and Expectations in Japanese Politics

On becoming prime minister in 2006, Abe Shinzō was feted as the ‘prince’ of Japanese politics. A year later, Abe's Liberal Democratic Party had suffered a major electoral defeat and Abe's time as his country's leader was over. As a study of political leadership, this article seeks to explain the leadership outcomes of Abe's brief prime ministership, in particular the dramatic fall in public support Abe suffered during his tenure. It is argued that, despite the difficult circumstances Abe faced, the nature of his political demise cannot be fully accounted for by structural factors alone. It is also necessary to understand the role played by Abe himself and, in particular, his flawed leadership strategy. In the end, Abe's political demise followed a basic logic: high expectations followed by disillusionment characterised by sudden plunges in approval—a tragedy of hubris leading to nemesis.     

苏俄、共产国际与中国国民党关系问题研究综述

近年来,随着《共产国际、联共(布)与中国革命档案丛书》以及中国国民党方面资料的问世,苏俄、共产国际与中国国民党交往的部分史料得以公开,伴随着国民党问题研究热潮的出现,苏俄、共产国际与中国国民党关系问题也逐渐成为众多学者关注和研究的新重点。这方面研究经历了由浅及深的转变:对涉及这一问题的历史人物的研究,对苏俄、共产国际与中国革命关系史的研究,对苏俄、共产国际与中国国民党关系史的专题性研究。     

论行政诉讼中利害关系人的原告资格——以两案为例

在行政诉讼的原告资格中,利害关系人的原告资格是一个较为复杂的问题,我国司法解释赋予与具体行政行为有法律上利害关系的人以原告资格,但如何理解与认定法律上的利害关系,在理论与实践中均存纷争。值《行政诉讼法》酝酿修改之际,对法律上利害关系的内涵、决定利害关系人原告资格的核心要素及利害关系人原告资格的认定等问题重新进行梳理与分析,具有实际意义。     

The party choice set and satisfaction with democracy

A well-functioning democracy requires citizens’ support for its political institutions and procedures. While scholars have previously studied the role of contextual factors for explaining satisfaction with democracy, a rigorous focus on how the party choice set affects how satisfied citizens are with democracy is largely absent from the literature. This neglect of the impact of parties is surprising, given their central position within modern, representative democracies. In this article, a comprehensive and comparative analysis of the impact of party systems on citizens’ satisfaction with democracy is presented. Use is made of the combined data of the first four modules of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems project and various measures of the party system are used to capture different aspects of the party choice set: the number of parties, their polarisation, and the congruence between public opinion and the party offer. In contrast to expectations, only scant evidence is found that having a wider choice increases citizens’ satisfaction with democracy.