必要性与可行性:“被遗忘权”制度的引入之辩

数字化记忆是互联网信息时代的重要表征。“被遗忘权”制度的提出,突显了公众对“过度记忆”这一时代发展趋势的抗拒。但是,“被遗忘权”在本土化移植问题上面临着权利实施必要性、权利实现可行性双重困境。一方面,“被遗忘权”所欲保护的利益与我国《个人信息保护法》中“删除权”所涵摄之内容重叠;另一方面,“被遗忘权”的引入会影响公众言论自由权及知情权的行使,危害良性社会秩序的建立。同时,由于“被遗忘权”的权利内容过于宽泛,易被异化为一种“特权”,从而影响互联网信息的流动,抑制我国信息产业的发展。因此,我国目前不宜引入“被遗忘权”。     

Otherness in the Pratyabhijñā philosophy

Idealism is the core of the Pratyabhijñã philosophy: the main goal of Utpaladeva (fl. c. 925–950 AD) and of his commentator Abhinavagupta (fl. c. 975–1025 AD) is to establish that nothing exists outside of consciousness. In the course of their demonstration, these ?aiva philosophers endeavour to distinguish their idealism from that of a rival system, the Buddhist Vijñānavāda. This article aims at examining the concept of otherness (paratva) as it is presented in the Pratyabhijñā philosophy in contrast with that of the Vijñānavādins’. Although, according to the Pratyabhijñā, the other subjects are not ultimately real since all subjects are nothing but limited manifestations of a single absolute subject, the fact that we are aware of their existence in the practical world has to be accounted for. The Vijñānavādins explain it by arguing the we infer the others’ existence. The Pratyabhijñā philosophers, while refuting their opponents’ reasoning as it is expounded in Dharmakīrti’s Santānāntarasiddhi, develop a particulary original analysis of our awareness of the others, stating that this awareness is neither a perception (pratyak?a) nor an inference (anumāna), but rather a guess (ūha) in which we sense the others’ freedom (svātantrya).     

康德的法权哲学基础

康德的法权哲学思路是和他的三个《批判》所述一致的,“科学知识”要发现“自然(关系)”中的“必然性”,而“法权学”则是要在“人”的“关系”中发现“必然性”,也就是关于“法权”的“先天综合”何以可能的问题.“法权”问题又和《实践理性批判》里所论述的“自由”密切相关.“自由”的“限制”“关系”就《实践理性批判》所涉及的“道德”来说,“根据”在于一个“形式”的“应该”,而就现实的“国家-法律”来说,则是“自由者”之间的“法权”关系.“法权”“本体的所有”既“悬搁”又“范导”“现象的所有”.“自由者”在“人格-格位”“平等”基础上“限制”着各自的自由,由此而形成的“共同体”乃是“自由的共在”.     

评论侵权法律问题研究

评论权和名誉权是实现公民合法权益的两种体现。同时,二者之间存在交叉性,评论权使用过度将会构成名誉侵权。当前名誉侵权案件频发让我们不得不思考评论的合法性问题。为了更好地实现我国既保护名誉权又保护评论权的司法理念,有必要以"评论"为出发点进行初步探讨。     

The Rule in Wilkinson v Downton: Conduct,Intention, and Justifiability

The decision in OPO v MLA [2014] EWCA Civ 1277 causes confusion to the rule in Wilkinson v Downton. A strong line of authorities indicates that the defendant must either have an actual intention to cause physical injury or be reckless as to the causing of such harm, the latter being determined by the likelihood of harm being caused by the defendant's act. ‘Imputed intention’ does not form a separate category of mental state. There was also a missed opportunity to develop a ‘justifiability’ criterion, by which policy considerations can be taken into account to preclude an application of the tort. This criterion ought to be developed in a principled manner, in line with the existing jurisprudence concerning human rights and with the policy limitations as developed in the context of other torts.     

Liberal government and authoritarianism

This paper examines the intelligibility of authoritarian measures within Foucauldian analyses of the liberal government of the state. Such measures are understood as following from a liberal understanding of the task of government itself. This understanding rests on a distinction between the legal and political order (of 'the state') and a 'liberal police' of what is exterior to it, classically conceived as 'civil society'. The relation between these two aspects is conceived as a series of 'foldings' between the two sides of a liberal governing, which turn the injunction to govern through freedom into a set of binding obligations potentially or actually enforceable by coercive or sovereign instruments. The paper places this perspective within aspects of the genealogies of economy, poverty, welfare and police and discusses the trajectories of such foldings in the present.     

没有自由就没有社会主义——关于自由与社会主义的学术通信

自由与社会主义是不可分离、不可分割的,自由是社会主义的本质特征和价值目标。背离自由是苏联模式社会主义的一大弊端,对此,要从中吸取历史教训。改革开放以来,我国的社会主义自由和社会主义民主已经有了长足的进步。要从中国实际出发,正确处理好自由与民主、经济自由与政治自由、自由与自由主义、自由与法治的关系,从而加快发展社会主义自由。     

试论我国民事诉讼认证规则的改革与完善

长期以来,我国的民事诉讼制度缺乏系统、详细的认证规则,既影响了民事审判的质量,也容易滋生司法腐败。作为民事诉讼认证规则的补充,最高人民法院2001年颁布的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》之第五章是审判系统内部建立有关民事诉讼认证规则的积极尝试,一定程度上满足了审判工作的需要。但该章的规定仍有部分不妥之处,需要进一步完善。     

短期自由刑改革方式比较研究

在短期自由刑的利弊问题上折衷说是科学的。对待短期自由刑的科学态度是 :保留但应予以改革完善。短期自由刑的改革已经成为当代世界各国刑法改革运动的重要组成部分。世界各国在短期自由刑改革问题上主要存在两种方案 :一种是替代型方案 ;另一种是完善型方案。我国当前应从以下几方面进行改革 :建立短期自由刑易科非监禁刑制度 ;完善刑事犹豫制度 ;变通短期自由刑的传统执行方式。