政治参与行为对政治效能感的影响——基于浙江省闾村基层民主选举投票的实证调研

在关于政治参与影响政治效能感的研究中,国外学者发展出了＂工具说＂、＂发展说＂和＂结果说＂三种解释框架。虽然三种解释不尽相同,但学者普遍认为积极的政治参与对政治效能感有一定的正面影响,尽管影响的因素、程度和范围存在不同。本文基于浙江省闾村实证调研,发现选举式的参与活动（参与投票、参与竞选活动、投票给当选者、参与当选者的助选活动）均未能显著影响政治效能感和村民效能感。甚至在村民的投票行为与主观期望的结果相一致时（投票给当选者、参与当选者的助选活动）,亦未能发现其对效能感的显著影响。     

论国有企业创先争优与提升企业竞争力的同构性

创先争优是国有企业党组织保持先进性和纯洁性的根本要求,是巩固党的基层组织建设的重要目标,也是提升企业核心竞争力、创建一流企业的有效载体。基于国有企业党的建设和经营发展两个系统中创先争优与提升竞争力的同构性,以及打造世界一流企业的主题,把创先争优内化为企业文化和人的品质,必将形成创建一流企业、推动企业科学发展的持久的强大的动力。     

法治视阈下警察纪律建设若干问题的思考

警察纪律法治化是警察法治文明的重要标志。《公安机关人民警察纪律条令》的颁布是警察纪律建设的里程碑,具有重要的法治意义,主要体现在完善了警察法律体系,标志着具有公安特色的惩治和预防腐败体系的初步建立,必将有力地推进警察法治文明建设。与以往的公安机关的惩戒性规范相比,《公安机关人民警察纪律条令》具有创新性、严厉性、全面性以及可操作性等特点。当前警察纪律建设要特别注重两个方面问题:一是在法治视阈下探析《公安机关人民警察纪律条令》的适用问题;二是以法治方式推进《公安机关人民警察纪律条令》的实施。     

审视并反思我国高等教育潜在的四种危机——基于iPhone利益分配的视角

通过对iPhone的技术参数、定价、利润分配三个图表的分析,解读了iPhone的传奇现象,揭示了其背后的科技内涵。基于高等教育的科研职能,提出了我国高等教育在科研创新和成效推广中潜在的四种危机。旨在认识并理清它们之间的关系,反思我国目前的高等教育现状,以期对我国高等教育的发展起到启示和借鉴作用,进而加快我们由"中国制造"向"中国创造"迈进的步伐。     

标签理论在高校学生评价体系中的应用

标签理论作为社会工作的重要理论,对高校学生评价体系的有效开展也具有同样重要的意义。如何正确运用高校学生评价中的标签对学生的健康发展就显得尤为重要。作为高校教育者不仅应懂得善于给学生张贴积极标签,还应懂得如何避免消极标签的负面效应,从而促进大学生的健康全面发展。     

清官“吏德”论

中国古代清官的“吏德”,是中国特定文化塑造出来的一种廉政文化遗产,是中华传统美德的重要组成部分。清官“吏德”,主要留存于哲人、明君、贤相、清官的警策语录中,内容比较宽泛,主要有四点：一是清正廉明的勤勉;二是知耻好洁的慎独;三是民胞物与的仁恤;四是正道直行的坚守。学习与继承古代清官的“吏德”,能进一步提升公务员道德素养,改善执政环境,从而推动整个社会的道德建设。     

Negotiating climate legislation: Policy path dependence and coalition stabilization

This article investigates the nature of policy path dependence through analysis of climate policy formation in the United States. In 2008 the US Congress attempted to pass the Lieberman–Warner bill, a comprehensive climate and energy package that would have capped greenhouse emissions and established a nationwide cap and trade program. In the same year, California successfully enacted the Global Warming Solutions Act. This article explores the circumstances of both cases and raises the question of why legislation at the state level was successful and took such a divergent form from legislation at the federal level. The divergence of these cases is used to highlight the nature of coalition formation and policy path dependence in the legislative process. Explanations of policy tend to gravitate toward either the generalizability of game theoretic approaches or the empirical depth of case studies. This article suggests a combined approach that uses case studies to analyze the positions and motivations of actors and to then model policy development over time. The approach examines policy through the formation and negotiation of policy coalitions. Drawing on the Advocacy Coalition Framework and omnibus analysis, the approach expands these coalition theories first by analysing legislative development at the interface of legislators and constituent interest groups, and second by adding temporal dimension to the analysis. The findings suggest that policy is path dependent in that it is negotiated between coalitions that in turn create stability in the policy process and insulate policy fields from external shocks. Policy path dependence suggests that theory alone is insufficient to predict policy outcomes; policy results depend strongly on prior policy efforts, historically and socially contingent coalitions, and the resulting framing of policy possibilities.     

软法语境下高校自治规则的合法性重塑

高校内部自治规则本身的合法性问题引发了高校治理的合法性危机。传统的行政法研究进路虽解决了高等学校作为行政诉讼被告的必要性问题,但对高校自治规则本身合法性问题的回避,使其无法在最终意义上为高校依法善治开出一剂良药。相较之下,软法则为高校自治规则的合法性构建提供了新的研究路径：一方面,以开放、参与和协商为特征的软法机制与高校自治的精神在本质上相契合;另一方面,软法规范需置于宪法和相关硬法的约束之下,则又可以防止高校自治脱离国家法,背离良法之治。     

基于系统论的治安情报信息网络体系分析

治安情报信息网络体系主要指围绕治安情报信息的各种活动,如生成、整理加工、传输、存储与应用而组成的各种要素(主要涉及人和物的要素)以及这些要素之间的联系机制,要从制度层面完善治安情报网络体系技术标准,包括治安情报信息采集报送机制、研判机制、交流机制、反馈机制以及一系列的考核管理机制,并在网络体系建设中注意整体性、要素相干性、结构层次性及动态开放性等系统特点。     

Explaining preferences for redistribution: A unified framework to account for institutional approaches and economic self‐interest for the case of monetary transfers for families and children

Explanations of different patterns of preferences for redistribution either highlight the role of the institutional framework in a country or highlight the importance of self‐interest and rational expectations. The study introduces a unified approach to explain differences in preferences for redistributive measures for the case of intergenerational monetary transfers for families and children. Both explanatory approaches are integrated into the action‐based Model of Frame Selection that incorporates normative motives and economic self‐interest into the process of decision making. Using a large sample that deals with questions on the approval of public policies for families and accounts for the normative importance of children and family life in Germany, evidence is provided that both approaches are valid in explaining preferences for government transfers.