CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IN EUROPEAN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: WHY ARE FAMILY PRACTICES SO DIFFERENT FROM LEGAL THEORIES?

Debates about child custody following parental separation often have been framed in terms of a battle between the competing rights of different family members. In the United States, advocates of mothers’ rights square off against proponents of fathers’ rights, with each side claiming to truly represent children's rights. Of course, not all advocates lay claim to children's rights in contact and custody disputes merely as a tactical maneuver. Some experts believe that children are entitled to (and benefit from) their own, independent legal advocate in custody cases. In theory, at least, the position that children lay claim to a third set of independent rights is strongly held in Europe, more strongly than in many U.S. states, because of the adoption of United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in Europe, but not in the United States. In this article, we examine children's rights in custody disputes from a European perspective, particularly children's legal right to contact with their parents, as well as the children's right to be heard in custody and contact disputes. We find that, despite differences in legal theory, tradition, and family demographics, European countries ultimately face a familiar reality: Custody and contact disputes are, in reality, more about renegotiating family relationships than they are a matter of a mother's, father's, or child's rights.     

尊重党员主体地位和保障党员民主权利的理论基础及时代价值

马克思主义经典作家阐述了尊重党员主体地位与保障党员民主权利的一系列原则问题，为确立党员主体地位和保障党员民主权利奠定了基础。同时，我们党提出“尊重党员主体地位，保障党员民主权利”的重要论断具有鲜明的时代内涵和丰富的时代价值。     

Zum grundbücherlichen Richtigkeitsgebot und seiner amtswegigen Verwirklichung (§ 28 LiegTeilG) (1. Teil)

Die übereinstimmung zwischen Grundbuch, Kataster und Realit?t liegt im Schnittpunkt zwischen Gesetzgebung und ?konomie im ?ffentlichen Interesse. Im LiegTeilG, sohin an unvermuteter Stelle, ist ein Verfahren zur amtswegigen Verwirklichung dieses Kongruenzprinzips normiert, dessen prozessuales Instrumentarium durch auch jüngste Gesetzgebungsakte direkt und indirekt deformiert worden ist. Diese Abhandlung untersucht, ob die ursprünglich verfolgten gesetzgeberischen Intentionen zur Herstellung der Grundbuchsordnung auf der geltenden Rechtslage im judikativen Weg gem §§ 6 f ABGB revitalisierbar sind oder ob es zu deren Reanimation eines legistischen Eingriffs bedarf.     

减刑制度中引进听证程序的几点法理思考

减刑制度相对于其他刑罚制度，实践应用最广。在对罪犯的惩罚改造过程中，绝大多数服刑犯罪人都可能受益于这项制度。它体现着我国刑罚执行制度中惩罚与改造相结合、教育与劳动相结合的原则，效益性原则。刑罚执行的人道主义和个别化，有利于对服刑犯罪人的有益改造。减刑的公平、公正与否，也直接关系到我国刑罚目的和刑罚执行功能的实现。我国现行的刑事立法和相关的司法解释，虽然对减刑都作出了相关的规定，然而，在制度设计上比较宽泛和粗糙，亟待进一步完善，以使其适应我国新时代的法治要求，促进我国法制的发展。本文主要围绕监狱管理机关在刑罚执行中对减刑制度引进听证程序进行法理分析，完善制度缺陷，实现公平、正义，构建法治的和谐社会。     

Why is there no securitisation theory in the Korean nuclear crisis?

Despite the fact that the Korean nuclear crisis is one of the most protracted security issues in the world, the research analysing the crisis from the perspective of securitisation theory is curiously absent. This article attempts to pin down some distinguishing features of South Korea’s securitisation of the nuclear threat posed by North Korea, thereby investigating why one rarely sees the implications of securitisation theory in the way that the Copenhagen School theorists would suggest. Borrowing the key components of securitisation theory—existential threats, referent objects and extraordinary measures—this article suggests three elusive characteristics of the South Korean actors’ speech acts as sources highlighting the dilemma. To make the article’s arguments clearer, I hold Floyd’s classification of securitisation theory, which separated the securitisation process into two different stages: securitising move and security practice. While acknowledging the importance of the differences between illocution and perlocution in a securitisation process, this article takes this logic one step further by suggesting the limits of the perlocutionary effect in making the securitisation process complete.     

环境公益诉权及其程序保障——以检察机关提起环境公益诉讼为视角

实践表明,我国保护环境的传统模式即行政执法方式是失灵的。当前,探索司法介入环境保护的新模式是必要的,而环境司法的首要问题就是环境公益诉权的问题。根据我国实际情况,赋予检察机关环境公益诉权不仅是必要的,而且是可行的。同时,还要探索检察机关在提起环境公益诉讼过程中的诉讼地位、处分权的规制、证明责任的分配、诉讼时效等程序机制,以达到既保障且诉权、又加以合理规制的目的。     

民法诚信原则与劳动法适用之博弈论纲——以“奋斗者协议”和“自愿弃保”为例

"奋斗者协议"与"自愿弃保"案件背后隐含的法理可简概为民法诚信原则与劳动法适用问题。实践中的误读和误判、《民法典》缺失劳动权(益)之基本民事权利设置、共享经济下新型劳动用工和疫情与后疫情时代之多重叠加效应,导致了劳动法之"衰"与"殇"。民法诚信原则同样适用劳动法含社会保障法,所谓劳动法不能适用该原则或者民法思维模式都是不严谨之"伪"命题。劳动法适用诚信原则应当考量其特殊性,惩戒权适用时,应当遵循比例原则和有利原则,并不得涉及劳动者非职业行为即私人行为和排除社会保障权。任何排除或剥夺劳动者社会保障权的约定或规章都是无效的。后劳动合同义务适用诚信原则不能"选择性""遗漏"抗辩权,如果当事人依法行使抗辩权,则不能裁定其违反了诚信原则,否则就是"伪"民法思维模式。实习关系属于特殊的劳动关系,在实习法律规范严重缺失下,用具有弥补法律不足之价值与功能的诚信原则治理"虚假实习"完全必要而且可行。     

浅议股东代表诉讼中原被告的和解

股东代表诉讼应当允许原被告和解,但也要受到一定的限制。法院在诉讼和解中承担着监督与审查的义务。诉讼中原被告和解应当向法院提出书面申请,并说明和解的可能性。法院审查确认时,应以适当的方式通知公司及其他股东,告知其和解协议的内容以及提出异议的权利。     

中国工人阶级的世纪奋斗与现实启迪

中国工人阶级是我国先进生产力和生产关系的代表,是中国共产党最坚实最可靠的阶级基础,在历次革命、建设、改革和发展变革中,做出了巨大历史贡献。新形势下,要始终保持工人阶级的先进性,高度重视巩固党的阶级基础,充分发挥工人阶级主力军作用,切实加强和改进工会工作,实践时代所赋予的光荣使命。     

一个无根的“90后”非市民群体——在沪农民工同住子女生存现状

本文运用问卷调查、群体访谈的方法,对上海市＂90后＂农民工同住子女的生存与发展现状作了全景扫描研究。研究结果表明：1.＂90后＂农民工同住子女在学校教育中表现出＂转校频繁＂、＂英语学习困难＂、＂学习资源缺乏＂等现况,但其同伴交往良好;2.＂90后＂农民工同住子女在城市融入的过程中,正逐步自我接纳为＂新上海人＂,未来不想成为＂无根的非市民;＂3.为了生存与发展,＂90后＂农民工同住子女具有强烈的升学意愿;4.对于未来的职业定位,＂90后＂农民工同住子女几乎都不愿从事父辈一样的工作,教师、医生、警察（军人）等受人尊重、服务社会的职业是他们大多数人共同的职业理想。