试论新纪纪新阶段高校工会建设与统战工作

高校工会和统战部作为高校党委直接领导下分立着的教职工团体和党委部门,在高校协调关系、理顺情绪、化解矛盾,推进学校民主政治建设等方面各自具有独特的功能和不可替代的作用,但是,她们各自的工作又是相辅相成,任务虽然不同,目标却是同一的。本文拟以新世纪新阶段高校工会建设为基点,试论其在推进高校党的统一战线工作中的作用。     

学校图书馆与素质教育

学校图书馆作为学校教育的三大支柱之一,在学生的素质教育中有着独特的作用.要充分发挥图书馆在素质教育中的思想品德和文化知识的教育功能,必须开展文献导读和全方位的信息服务工作,同时,还要加强馆员队伍建设,环境建设,为素质教育提供良好的内外部环境.     

刑事技术在毒品走私案侦办中的重要作用

毒品走私案件的侦办是一个不断思考和发现的过程。以刑事技术为指导的侦查理论思维更具科学性、系统性和实践性,是一种侦办毒品走私案科学化和现代化的思维方式,对于侦办复杂多变的毒品走私案件具有重要作用。     

The effect of institutional educational programming on prisoner misconduct

Relative to studies of recidivism, past research on prison educational programming has largely neglected to examine the relationship, if any, between participation in these programs and institutional misconduct. Using data from the National Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities (N = 6957), we assess the relationship between participation in prison educational programming and instances of prisoner misconduct, considering the types and completion of such programs. Utilizing a recently developed propensity score weighting procedure to adjust for selection into programming, our findings indicate that, contrary to research on educational participation and recidivism, those involved in prison educational programming are more likely to commit misconduct infractions than those who are not involved in these programs. Practical implications and directions for future research are explored.     

恩格斯的两种生产理论与共产主义

恩格斯的两种生产理论是恩格斯晚年的伟大贡献,是对马克思主义的发展与完善。两种生产的核心是人,人的需要推动了生产力的发展,两种生产在不同的历史阶段作用不同,社会越发展两者的融合程度越密切,最后逐渐成为一个整体。两种生产理论与共产主义社会有着密切的联系,它决定了共产主义社会的必然到来、主要内容、存在方式和发展历程,也是今天我们实行以人为本,坚持科学发展观的理论依据。     

论公安情报信息的效能作用及采控方法

公安情报信息在公安机关整体打、防、控的现实斗争中,具有无可比拟的积极作用。因此,在公安情报信息的采集整合中要做到主动控源、跟进甄别、及时流转以及随时保畅,同时,提高社区民警对社区信息的掌控能力,做到“勤访、勤查、勤思、勤谨”。     

权利行使与财产罪的辨析

对采取非法手段救济自己权利的行为,究竟应如何予以认定,无论是国外的理论界还是国内的刑法学界都存在不同的观点,而在相异观点的背后,又各自体现了不同的价值取向和选择。基于刑法机能二元论,在对行使权利行为分析考察时,应放在人权保障与社会保护的框架下,既要体现出维护社会秩序、保护国家安全的精神,还要体现出保障公民权利的取向。     

Estimating Mean Length of Stay in Prison: Methods and Applications

This paper examines various approaches to studying the mean length of stay in prison. The literature contains a wide range of estimates of this quantity. The discrepancies that appear in these estimates and in the conclusions reached from them have been the subject of several reviews. We build upon that work, using the life table as the gold standard, to demonstrate the inaccuracy of common measures such as the ratio of the population size to the annual number of entrances or the mean length of time served by those exiting in a particular period. This demonstration is conducted in two parts. One part uses model populations with constant growth rates; the second part relies upon simulated prison populations with time-varying rates of entrance and exit. In addition, we introduce two new indirect measures that are more accurate than several existing indirect measures and that are relatively easy to use. The new measures are based on the entrance rate or the exit rate and adjust for the growth rate of the prison population.

Specifying the Relationship Between Crime and Prisons

There is no scholarly consensus as to the proper functional form of the crime equation, particularly with regard to one critical, explanatory variable—prison population. The critical questions are whether crime and prison rates must be differenced, whether they are cointegrated, and whether they are simultaneously determined—whether crime and prison cause one another. To determine the proper specification, different researchers have applied unit-root, cointegration, and Granger tests to very similar data sets and obtained very different results. This has led to very different specifications and predictably different implications for public policy. These differences are more likely to be due to the methods used, rather than to real differences among the data sets. When the best available methods are used to identify the proper specification for a panel of U.S. states, results are fairly clear. Crime rates and prison populations are close to unit-root; crime and prison are not cointegrated; crime clearly affects subsequent prison populations. Thus the best specification of the crime equation must rely on differenced data and instrumental variables. Alternative specifications run a substantial risk of spurious results.

The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles and Level of Service Inventory-Revised: Screening Version as Predictors of Official and Self-reported Disciplinary Infractions

A total of 159 male inmates screened with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) and Level of Service Inventory-Revised: Screening Version (LSI-R:SV) were followed for a period of 24 months for evidence of disciplinary infractions (incident reports). Eighty-three of these inmates also furnished a self-report of disciplinary infractions occurring during the 24-month follow-up. The PICTS General Criminal Thinking (GCT) score and LSI-R:SV total score correlated with and accurately identified the presence of an officially recorded disciplinary infraction, an officially recorded severe disciplinary infraction, and a self-reported disciplinary infraction but only age and the GCT score achieved incremental validity when age, GCT, and LSI-R:SV were included as predictors in the same probit regression or loglinear survival equation.