医师收受药品回扣法律研究

现在医药领域里,回扣泛滥成灾,有着深刻的社会原因。医生收取回扣刑事上能否定罪,医生处方行为的性质定性以及受贿罪还是商业贿赂罪的定位在学界存在很大的争议。完善相关的法律制度,明确对医疗回扣的刑事民事行政责任的认定。寻求更好的法律救济,需要完善刑法立法,确定医生收取回扣刑法上的定罪量刑。建立医疗服务合同,加强行政监管,国家宏观调控的引导下结合市场经济的调节,保护患者合法利益,治理医疗腐败,解决医疗回扣问题势在必行。     

论证人刑事责任豁免制度

证人刑事责任豁免制度是现代西方法治国家的一项重要刑事司法制度。其基本功能和价值在于保证国家对重大犯罪的打击力度和实现司法资源的合理配置。我国在司法实践中已经出现过相关的案例 ,但是由于刑事诉讼基本理论研究的匮乏和立法的缺失 ,造成了实践的处理与现行法律规定的不相协调。因此 ,应结合我国具体的法治情况 ,借鉴外国有关该制度的立法成果 ,构建我国的证人刑事责任豁免制度     

责任保险中受害第三人请求权问题研究

当责任保险的被保险人发生破产、被撤销或死亡、失踪等情形 ,受害第三人能否直接向保险人索赔 ,我国保险法没有明确规定。我国保险法应借鉴外国和其他地区的立法经验 ,规定受害第三人在无法向被保险人索赔时 ,可以直接请求保险人在责任保险限额范围内予以赔偿     

试斩公务员韵行政责任伦理

行政责任是行政伦理学的核心范畴，实现行政责任是公务员的价值目标。行政责任的基本内涵，一方面指行政主体（政府及其公务员）对于其服务对象必须履行的法定义务或客观责任；另一方面则是指行政主体（政府及其公务员）对其面临的法定义务或客观行政责任所承担的主观责任。实现行政责任伦理必须以行政责任意识为基础，以行政组织文化为环境，以行政责任制度为保障，以行政伦理监督为制约。     

对我国社会保障模式选择与改革的反思

社会保障模式选择与变革受制于多重因素的影响。我国社会保障模式先后经历国家保险与社会保险两个阶段，其变革历程留下了深刻的经验教训，表现在公平与效率的关系失衡；政府与市场责任定位不明；价值取向误入歧途；理论基础薄弱、准备不足、研究滞后、创新不够。     

试论经侦调研工作若干问题

调研对于经侦工作显得尤为重要。经济犯罪隐蔽性极强,需要我们时刻调查、分析并研究经济犯罪的现状和原因,并由此预测未来的趋势,提出对策。     

Pluralism,corporatism and perception of corruption

When people know who is influencing the elected politicians and they may ‘put the rascals out’ in case they feel that the incumbents are corrupt, ceteris paribus, their perception of the level of corruption should not be affected by lobbying. If on the other hand people are not sure which or how many actors are influencing public policy and they are not able to hold the government truly accountable as interest group influence is constant with different governments, people will be more likely to perceive the government as corrupted. The former system is a characteristic of corporatism and the latter of pluralism. This problem is exacerbated by the fact that interest groups with resources such as business groups or firms in pluralist systems are more influential than groups with few resources. Thus, people may perceive pluralist policy‐making system as more corrupt than corporatist policy‐making system where fewer visible actors have more or less equal weight in the policy‐making process. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The Chat Room Moderator: Creating a Duty for Parents to Control Their Cyberbully

The advent of new technologies allowing people to communicate via the Internet has opened many windows to social interaction. At the same time, it has shifted the focus of child harassment from the playground to the computer. Instead of face‐to‐face bullying, children are now being bullied on the Internet, in a phenomenon known as “cyberbullying.” Cyberbullying is widespread, affecting generally twenty‐five percent of the child population in the United States. It is also more dangerous, as a child can be bullied at any time in the supposed comfort of his/her own home. To combat this behavior, many states have passed measures to ban or criminalize cyberbullying in school‐related settings. Nevertheless, children and adolescents continue to cyberbully their peers. Furthermore, most of these statutes do not address cyberbullying that occurs outside school or from a child's own home. Thus, this Note proposes that cyberbullying can be better combated by placing responsibility on parents to reasonably control their children in cases of cyberbullying. Based on the recently enacted ‘Cyber‐safety Act” from the Canadian Province of Nova Scotia and Restatement of Torts § 316, this Note proposes (1) placing tort responsibility on parents who know that their child is a cyberbully and do nothing about it and (2) allowing parents to avoid liability when their child truly cannot be controlled.

Key Points for the Family Court Community
• Cyberbullying is a major problem that must be addressed beyond the schoolyard.
• The law may provide recourse for the parents of a cyberbullying victim and can hold the parents of a cyberbully responsible.
• The Nova Scotia Cyber‐safety Act is a good model for holding parents liable for their child's acts because it balances the desire to end cyberbullying and the understanding that some minors are uncontrollable.

     

“保护的责任”与现代国际法律秩序

《2005年世界首脑会议成果》将“保护的责任”的范围限定于“保护人民免遭灭绝种族、战争罪、族裔清洗和危害人类罪之害的责任”,并明确国际社会提供保护的责任是国家保护的责任的补充。国际社会提供保护的前提是国家不能或怠于提供保护。灭绝种族、战争罪、族裔清洗和危害人类罪之害属于威胁人类安全的事项,因此,国际社会必须在联合国及其集体安全制度的框架范围内提供保护的责任。联合国框架下的“保护的责任”有利于防止大规模人道主义灾难和保护人类的安全,但在相关国际实践中要防止以此为借口破坏不干涉内政原则与联合国现行的集体安全制度。     

试论实现法治政府目标的路径

法治政府的建构是一个庞大的系统工程,它应从立法、执行和监督系统全面推进。要建立民主科学、立法为民的行政立法体系,重新确定行政立法的主体,限制政府权力,突出公共服务观念,建立民主立法机制,构建法治政府的指标体系。要建设高素质行政管理队伍,规范行政管理行为,健全以人为本的公开决策机制,创设长效的行政执法方式机制,注重行政行为的程序合法性。要加强监督制度建设,实现从权力政府到责任政府的转变,完善行政监督机制,构建全方位的监督体系。