论案外人异议之诉的废除

以程序性争议与实体性争议的分类为基础的案外人异议之诉,并不符合民事诉讼的法理。案外人异议之诉和案外人执行异议,实系分别以强制执行法的当事人主义和职权主义为基础。因此,制度的法理基础完全冲突的案外人异议之诉和案外人执行异议,无法在强制执行法中并存,二者必废其一。强制执行中的当事人主义和职权主义本无优劣之分,但需要结合一国的国情予以选择。从当前的国情出发,我国应当废除案外人异议之诉。     

论金融危机下发展权面临的挑战与出路

在全球金融危机中受到影响最大的是发展中国家及其人民的发展权利。危机对发展权的挑战,不仅体现在经济发展领域,也反映在社会文化以至政治发展层面,进而衍生为人的生存发展危机。要摆脱危机,就必须重新塑造发展权法治理念,从传统的形式平等和社会正义迈向一种新的正义观即发展正义,从现有的公法强制干预和私法自由调节转向政策性平衡新机制,在全球社会连带中实现自主发展。在这些新理念导引下,于法律重心的发展权定位、发展权指标体系的法律化以及强化国际与国内公共权力对发展权的法律责任三大方面进行制度建设,确立公共权力对发展权的自觉意识和可归责性、建立全球性的发展权法律标准以及危机预警与干预系统。     

浅议近亲属作证豁免权

“亲亲得相首匿”是我国古代的司法传统,这一传统也为现代世界刑事司法潮流所认同。而我国当代刑事司法却忽略了特殊证人———近亲属证人的权利,即拒绝作证权。我国刑事诉讼中应建立近亲属作证豁免权制度。     

把握丰富内涵 指导工会维权——学习中国特色社会主义工会维权观的体会

社会主义工会维权观是工会贯彻科学发展观取得的重要理论成果,其核心是以人为本,要旨是发展。在我们社会主义国家,劳动关系当事人根本利益一致,工会维权具有鲜明的中国特色,即工会维权追求的是劳动关系当事人互利共赢,以和谐的劳动关系促进企业发展,促进社会和谐。     

判断纸张折痕与写印字迹先后次序的实验研究

添改文件属于变造文件的一种,在污损文件检验中占据重要地位。对一份疑似添改的文件进行真伪识别,不仅要看形成文件的物质材料的理化性质是否遵循其正常的变化规律,还要看整份文件的形成过程是否符合正常的行文程序。由于各种色料与纸张折痕交叉,不同形成次序时交叉部位呈现出来的表观特征存在差别,因而能够根据这种差别判断色料与折痕形成的先后次序,进而为确定一份可疑的文件是否存在添改事实提供依据。     

Maternal Acceptance as a Moderator of the Relation Between Threat to Self Appraisals and Mental Health Problems in Adolescents from Divorced Families

Appraisals about the implications of stressful events that are evaluated as involving a threat to self (negative self-evaluation, negative evaluation from others, rejection by others) have been shown to place youth at risk for the development of mental health problems. This longitudinal study tested a protective-stabilizing interactive model, in which high maternal acceptance was predicted to mitigate the prospective relation between threat to self appraisals and change in adolescents’ mental health problems six months later. Participants were 89 adolescents from divorced families ages 10–12 and residential mothers. Adolescents reported on threat to self appraisals from the most stressful event experienced in the past month. Mothers and youth reported on maternal acceptance and mental health problems. Multiple regression analyses provided support for the protective effects of maternal acceptance on adolescents’ mental health problems. Intervention implications are discussed. Ana Brown is a pre-doctoral fellow in prevention research (NIMH 2 T32 MH18387–19) and doctoral student in the Department of Psychology at Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. Research interests include the study of children’s appraisals and responses to stressful events in the prevention of mental health problems. Sharlene Wolchik is a clinical psychologist and professor in the Department of Psychology at Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. Her research focuses on identifying risk and protective factors for children whose parents have divorced. She also has designed and evaluated the efficacy of preventive interventions for children from divorced families and children who have experienced parental bereavement. Jenn-Yun Tein is a research associate professor and Co-Director of the Research Methodology Core of the Prevention Research Center at Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. Her research interests include analyses of mediation and moderation of preventive interventions as well as applications of methodology and statistics in prevention research. Irwin Sandler is a Regents’ Professor in the Department of Psychology and Director of the Prevention Research Center at Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. His research interests focus on understanding resilience for children exposed to stress and on the development, evaluation and dissemination of programs to promote resilience and prevent mental health problems for children in stress.     

论警察执法权益的刑法保护

面临日益增多的暴力袭警事件,必须加强刑事立法,使警察的执法权益得到根本性的保障.在刑法总则排除社会危害性行为的内容中增设依法履行职务的行为;在刑法分则中增设有关袭警犯罪的内容,以加强对警察执法权益的刑法保护.     

论一般赃物犯罪的客观要件

一般赃物类犯罪的犯罪对象“赃物”应包括物品和收益两大类。对一些特殊物品及其收益,如违禁品应区别对待:法律有特别规定的,按独立罪名定。善意第三人占有的赃物丧失了赃物的属性。变卖加工后的赃物仍然是赃物。一般赃物犯罪的客观行为包括窝藏、转移、收购、代为销售或者以其他方法掩饰、隐瞒赃物。     

关于建构我国传闻证据规则的理论思考

证人庭外的证言以及在法庭上陈述的非亲身经历的事实,通常不能作为法庭认定犯罪事实的依据.传闻证据规则的确立具有深厚的理论基础,其中最主要的是正当程序的理论.我国没有建立传闻证据规则,原因在于观念和机制两方面存在制约.应该在我国建构传闻证据规则,在不损害被告人质证权的前提下,设置例外情况.     

论鉴定科学证据的科学基础——鉴定证据的标准、效力及适用

鉴定科学证据的运用无疑能提升刑事证明的有效性和可靠性,但是若被不当理解和运用则会造成对刑事司法公正性和实质真实发现的干扰。对鉴定科学证据,需要制定若干标准作为对其存在的知识基础的衡量指标。鉴定结论由于其知识基础的不同,其效力和可靠性也会有所差异。司法实践中,对科学鉴定证据的应用须设置一定的程序控制,以便对其进行把关和过滤。