公证效力误区之辨析

将公证效力分为证据力、执行力和实体法效力这三大效力是恰当的,应予以坚持。我国奉行实质公证理念,公证书不须质证;公证的执行力对保证人应限制适用,对债权人的约束则是不得起诉,而作为公证执行力的启动环节,执行证书制度在理论和当前实践中都有正当化依据;法定公证和约定公证是某些法律行为的生效要件,我国应在不动产交易中引入公证前置程序,以维护和促进社会信用体系的良性运转。     

工作记忆中央执行功能研究新进展

中央执行功能是工作记忆系统中最重要却又研究最少的一个成分。对中央执行功能的研究存在神经心理学、认知行为、脑成像，以及计算模拟等多种途径。近年来研究较多的执行功能包括：双任务协调、注意转换、抑制优势反应、记忆刷新等。目前该领域的研究热点是，运用潜变量分析和脑成像等多学科的先进手段，对执行功能的可分离性和结构有效性进行研究。     

Blowing Hot and Cold – Intergovernmental Relations Capacity in the Commonwealth Government

The role of the intergovernmental affairs specialist is to protect and extend the powers of the jurisdiction for which he works (Donald Smiley quoted in Warhurst 1987 ).     

Cursing the Cloud (or) Controlling the Cloud?

Inspired by the cloud computing hypes, this paper responds to some of the hypes, but not to all. The hype in this paper refers to the level of the adequacy of data protection and privacy in a cloud computing (the Cloud) environment. Paradoxically, this paper proffers observational insights that surround the Cloud from the perspectives of data protection and privacy. It examines briefly the efforts of January 2010 led by Microsoft and anticipating “liability” scenarios. The liability rhetorically refers to the illegal access in the Cloud. This paper does not focus entirely on the technology sophistication; however, it analyses two scenarios of illegal access. To mitigate the liability, it suggests a “Cloud Compliant Strategy (CCS)” being a proposed model to control the Cloud. The observational insights of this paper have also intertwined with the adequacy of data protection from the lenses of the European Union (EU) Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (DPD) and Safe Harbor provisions (SH).     

论上市公司高管薪酬的法律规制

上市公司高管薪酬机制中存在数额失控、市场竞争不能有效约束、董事会不能合理决定、高管薪酬和公司业绩不挂钩等突出问题,由此引发了民众不满、学者批评和政府行动。因此,市场机制、公司自治和行政干预方面采取的应对措施存在的不足。而上市公司高管薪酬问题兼具公共性与私有性,应合理划分公权干预与公司自治空间,完善上市公司治理结构,加强高管薪酬长期激励机制,完善相关披露制度,相机选择法律控制模式。     

简论消防行政处罚的主体

本文辨析了消防行政处罚主体与消防行政主体、消防行政处罚执行主体的关系,厘清了消防行政处罚的主体范围,以便各主体依法实施处罚。     

财政监督与政府执行力——对《利马宣言》的扩展性解读

1977年,由最高审计机关国际组织大会通过的《利马宣言》明确表述了财政的系统监督主张。在这一主旨下,本文考察了分权制衡的权力体制中立法机构、行政部门的财政监督职责,描述并分析了广东省进行的财政绩效预算改革,从中引申出行政性预算改革对于整个绩效预算具有的重要作用和重大意义。最后,回归《利马宣言》对财政进行系统监督的精神宗旨,申述了建构系统的财政监督机制对于提高政府执行力所具有的价值。     

Challenging Executive Dominance in European Democracy

Executive dominance in the contemporary EU is part of a wider migration of executive power towards types of decision making that eschew electoral accountability and popular democratic control. This democratic gap is fed by far‐going secrecy arrangements and practices exercised in a concerted fashion by the various executive actors at different levels of governance and resulting in the blacking out of crucial information and documents – even for parliaments. Beyond a deconstruction exercise on the nature and location of EU executive power and secretive working practices, this article focuses on the challenges facing parliaments in particular. It seeks to reconstruct a more pro‐active and networked role of parliaments – both national and European – as countervailing power. In this vision parliaments must assert themselves in a manner that is true to their role in the political system and that is not dictated by government at any level.     

影响企业执行力的因素及对策

企业的执行力影响着企业的生存和效益,提升执行力是企业的一个持久的话题。市场竞争残酷无情,企业要发展、要提升效益既要靠管理者的科学决策,又要靠决策的有效执行。好的执行力,可以使上下同欲、政令畅通,是企业兴旺发达的必由之路。企业要建立一种切实可行的执行文化,并通过领导者的身体力行,带动员工做好企业工作,使企业执行力成为企业持久的发展动力。     

Maybe Wilson Was Right: Espoused Values and Their Relationship to Enacted Values

Public administration scholars have little understanding of the operation of values within public sector organizations. Because the institutional values literature suggests that behavior consistent with American values by public organizations and officials can make a difference in successful policy outcomes, this research focuses on identifying the espoused and enacted value perspectives for two sets of U. S. government officials, presidents and senior executives. Through a content analysis of agency mission statements and speeches of Presidents Bush, Clinton and Bush, a subject matter analysis of executive orders, and a survey of senior executives, the following information is identified: The three presidents espouse the same set of values (i.e., ethics, performance, and support) in their speeches, but enact only one common value (i.e., commitment) in their executive orders. Although not statistically significant, two (i.e., performance and ethics) of the three top values in the agency mission statements are consistent with the values of the presidents. Senior executive perceptions of the most important values (i.e., authority, reward, and support) differ from the presidents. This unexpected difference lends support to Woodrow Wilson’s politics/administration dichotomy in that senior executives focus on values that address policy implementation while presidents focus on values related to politics.