公安院校学报编辑的主体意识

对于公安院校学报编辑来说,主体意识应该包括相对于学报和栏目的主体意识、相对于作者及其作品的主体意识、相对于院校科研的主体意识和相对于公安学术的主体意识。目前,公安院校学报编辑的主体意识还相对薄弱,应加强信息化、规范化和管理意识,不断提高编辑专业素养和公安学术素养,确立现代编辑意识,掌握高科技编辑技能,为公安学术发展服务。     

论道德的本质

关于道德的本质问题的争论,在伦理思想史上,主要表现为道德本体论与道德工具论之争;在当今学界又表现为道德规范说与道德主体说之争。道德的本质应该是在规范性和主体性的矛盾统一中,非强制地反映和调节社会性利益关系的具有伦理价值的一种实践精神活动。     

论公安专用网络建设与信息安全的管理

近年来,全国各地公安机关正在不断加大信息化建设的力度并已初见成效,但随着公安计算机通讯网络的发展和相继互联,公安业务的警用信息化建设和信息安全管理方面的问题也日益突出。因此,及时有效地解决公安网络建设和警用信息管理中出现的新问题,才能促使公安信息化建设得到健康有序的发展。     

浅析国家豁免的几个问题

国家豁免泛指一国的行为和财产不受另一国的立法、司法和行政等方面的管辖。国家豁免是一项国际法原则,主权平等理论是其主要法律依据。国家豁免的主体包括国家及其政府机关、联邦国家的组成单位、国家政治区分单位、国家机构或部门和其他实体、国家代表。关于国家豁免范围,许多国家先后抛弃了绝对豁免的主张,转向限制国家豁免的立场。     

侦查学逻辑起点探讨

关于侦查学的逻辑起点。理论界目前主要有三种观点。其中认为侦查学的逻辑起点是“刑事案件”的观点,以及认为侦查学的逻辑起点是犯罪事实的二重性命题的观点尚有几个问题待讨论,还需再斟酌。而认为侦查学的逻辑起点是犯罪行为的观点目前比较有说服力——此观点运用系统理论,从大系统到小系统,从外层到内层,逐层推导出侦查学的逻辑起点是犯罪行为。这是一个新思路,新视角。     

在国家管辖豁免中国家行为的性质认定

随着国家参与的经济活动越来越多,限制豁免理论逐渐发展成为国际习惯。如何认定国家行为,是限制豁免理论要解决的首要问题。国家行为是由合格的主体代表国家所从事的行为,判断国家行为的标准有"目的标准"和"性质标准"。从各国的司法实践来看,性质标准更具有合理性。我国已经从绝对豁免的立场向限制豁免的立场转变,但根据什么标准来认定国家行为,国内尚存在立法空白,因此,应尽快制定《外国主权豁免法》,以适应发展的要求。     

纳税人意识概念的法层次分析

"税收是文明的对价",税收就是将国家和纳税人个体结成为一个纽带连接到一起。在税收产生的进程中,随着法治、平等、公平等理念的出现,在现代法治国家中,必然要求纳税人意识的产生。何为纳税人意识,本文将从三个方面具体阐述纳税人意识的内涵。     

上海公安教育信息化建设的认识和思考

公安教育信息化建设作为公安教育训练工作的重要建设内容,越来越受到公安机关和公安院校的重视。公安教育信息化建设必须与公安工作、职业教育和信息化建设的发展趋势相适应。上海公安教育信息化建设必须遵循"统一领导、统一规划、统一建设、统一管理、统一标准"的原则,按照"整体规划、战训对口、虚实结合、突出重点"的思路,依托和利用公安信息化建设的支撑和动力,加大投入,科学建设、规范管理,切实提高公安教育训练的效能和水平。     

Networks of organised black market labour in the building trade

The building industry is a sector characterised by a large number of opportunities to commit economic crime. In Sweden, the level of tax avoidance in the building trade is estimated to be substantial, and the use of black market labour extensive. This article focuses on the organised use of black market labour in the building industry, which may be described as a form of both economic and organised crime. To date only a very small number of criminological studies have examined the use of black market labour in this sector of the economy. The article focuses on two of the central roles found in the context of organised, black market labour: the “fixer” and the “criminal entrepreneur”. The fixer is an individual with expertise in the methods of economic crime. The criminal entrepreneur acts first and foremost as a link between a client and the manpower required by this client. In this paper, fixers and criminal entrepreneurs are studied on the basis of data from the Swedish Register of Suspected Offenders. The analysis shows that the networks of fixers and criminal entrepreneurs overlap one another to some extent. There are nonetheless a number of differences between the two groups and also between their respective networks. The networks of the fixers are larger than those of the criminal entrepreneurs, and the individuals that comprise the fixers’ networks are suspected in connection with much larger numbers of offences. The fixers more often commit offences together with others and also have larger numbers of suspected co-offenders than the criminal entrepreneurs. On the other hand, the criminal entrepreneurs are suspected of having maintained their ties to suspected co-offenders for longer periods of time than the fixers. The fixers appear to specialise in fraud and forgery offences, whereas motoring offences, smuggling and drug offences are more common among the criminal entrepreneurs. The networks are highly male-dominated and on balance they are comprised of much older individuals than those of traditional offenders. Many of the fixers and criminal entrepreneurs are suspected of committing offences with the same co-offender for a long period of time. Further out in the networks, co-offenders are replaced more often. Tax offences are very common in both types of network, both in those parts of the network that are close to the fixers and criminal entrepreneurs, and also in more distant parts of the networks. In the more distant parts of the networks, there is also an increase in the proportion of offences that individual network members are suspected of committing. Judging from the material examined in the current study, violent offences do not appear to be very common among either fixers or criminal entrepreneurs. The networks examined are largely comprised of individuals suspected of economic offences. These individuals are linked together with one another by means of direct and indirect contacts that produce semi-legal networks of individuals with knowledge of organised black market labour.

论小区电信设施建设纠纷多发的原因及解决纠纷的法律途径——以小区基站建设纠纷为视点

准确界定与小区电信设施建设相关法律关系的性质,对于合理确定各方当事人权利义务,减少因电信设施建设产生的纠纷,具有重要意义。电信设施的建设与业主利益密切相关,在处理小区电信设施纠纷时,既要保护小区业主的权利,同时又要对该权利加以限制来维护社会公共利益。