从审判实践看依法促进民营经济健康快速发展

确保民营经济健康快速发展,首先,民营企业应树立科学的发展观,增强法律意识,维权意识,依法经营意识;其次,行政机关对民营企业的干预不得错位,监督不得缺位;最后,司法机关正确处理好五个关系,落实六项机制,提供司法保障和司法服务。     

Hearsay and Human Rights: Al‐Khawaja in the Grand Chamber

This note analyses the European Court of Human Rights' Grand Chamber judgment in Al‐Khawaja and Tahery v United Kingdom, and gives it a cautious welcome. The note suggests how English Courts might respond to the judgment and concludes by assessing justifications for strong confrontation rights and the wider political context of the Grand Chamber's decision.     

“两个证据规定”运行情况实证调研——以S省G市地区法院为考察对象

"两个证据规定"出台实施后,其呈现出的实践面相到底若何,究竟是满足了制度预期还是"经历坎坷",这都需要走进司法实践,以旁观者的视角对其进行考察、审视后才能加以回答。基于此,课题组于2011年11月选取了S省G市为调研蓝本,重点关注并调研了以下几个方面:(1)非法证据的认定、排除程序;(2)瑕疵证据的补正与合理解释;(3)特殊侦查措施的适用、质证;(4)证人出庭作证;(5)翻供、翻证的处理;(6)证据裁判原则的运用。在对上述六个专题的实践样态以及存在问题进行客观描述后,课题组对其加以评析,并在此基础上提出了对策建议,以期对立法、司法部门、理论界作出有益的贡献。     

Young Children in Divorce and Separation: Pilot Study of a Mediation‐Based Co‐Parenting Intervention

This article reports on a cluster randomized pilot study of a mediation‐based intervention for separated parents of very young children, Young Children in Divorce and Separation (YCIDS). The control group intervention was “Mediation plus Reading.” Participants were separated parents attending mediation over a co‐parenting dispute concerning a child under the age of 5 years (n=33 cases). Nine of the 16 key child and parent outcomes were significantly better for the intervention group, with the remainder nonsignificant between groups. Mediators reported 35 per cent lower referral on to legal action for YCIDS cases following mediation. Implementation complexities of the YCIDS program led to the development of an online intervention format, now the subject of a further study. Further implications of this pilot study are discussed.     

新形势下医疗损害赔偿纠纷案件的审理情况、问题与对策

为了研究如何在审判实践中贯彻实施《侵权责任法》。本文在分析近年来北京市法院系统医疗损害赔偿纠纷案件收结案数量、结案方式、案件特点等基本情况的基础上,研究了北京市法院在《侵权责任法》实施后审理医疗损害赔偿纠纷案件的若干疑难问题,并对当前审判实践中的一些突出疑难问题提出审判对策。     

简易程序适用范围标准的比较

简易程序案件适用范围标准是简易程序设计的关键.民事简易程序由于法律文化传统的差异而导致具体的程序设计不同,我国大陆民事诉讼法规定较为笼统,有一些反面的列举性规定是散见于民事诉讼法典之中,且通过最高人民法院作了归纳性的司法解释,但仍然不系统和明确,实际操作起来很困难.为了完善我国民事简易程序立法,有必要重新确立简易程序适用范围标准.     

“80后”研究综述

"80后"随着自身的不断成长,已经逐渐成为中国特色社会主义事业的重要推动者,社会对于"80后"的认识也在不断的理性化、客观化。本文从三个方面对这一研究成果做了综述:"80后"与"80后"现象,"80后"与"80后"现象产生的时代背景,"80后"的行为方式以及与社会的互动。通过对"80后"与"80后"现象的综述来更好地走入这样一个群体。     

审判职能、说服责任与“案结事了”

本文从司法审判的特点、说服责任的性质与和谐价值的实现等方面。探讨了它们与“案结事了”的关系。在法治社会。法院的角色是根据证据裁判原则解决社会争端。诉讼各方必须履行说服责任,才能使法院判决具有可接受性,使争端得到终局性解决。法院作为国家审判机关．不应以调解优先,而应以增强证据意识、完善证据制度来实现案结事了。在刑事诉讼中．只有强化公诉人的说服责任,达到使事实认定者确信无疑的证明标准．才能减少冤假错案,实现案结事了。在民事诉讼中,应当遵循体现和谐价值的“不能采纳用以证明过错或责任的”证据规则．才能避免“善有恶报”、“案结事坏”的恶果。     

Off-label Paediatric Drug Use for Juvenile Depression and the Clinical Trial Regulations 2004: The Impact of Available Protective Mechanisms

Across Europe, around one in four adults experience a mental health problem in any 1 year. It is estimated that 2–6% of children and adolescents suffer from depression and suicide is now the third leading cause of death in 10–19 year olds. Despite traditional Freudian teachings that children rarely suffer from clinically diagnosed depression, treatment figures for juvenile depression have soared in recent years. For adults, the current treatment trend, as advocated by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), is the use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), such as Prozac. For children, efficacy of such treatment remains difficult to judge as all SSRI use in paediatric care remains ‘off-label’ or unlicensed. Notwithstanding this, in 2006 the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) advocated the use of Prozac within the EU for children from the age of eight, a position that reinforced the stance adopted by NICE in 2005. These recommendations have been made despite growing concern that many SSRIs have some serious side effects. In new legislation for paediatric medicines, that came into effect on 26th January 2007, the European Union (EU) has attempted to address several unresolved issues relating to children’s needs for medicines in Europe. This paper considers the position of off-label drug-therapy for juvenile depression, and assesses the effectiveness of available legal mechanisms that can protect juveniles from harm when involved in clinical drug trials, most notably the Clinical Trial Regulations 2004. It further reviews the new EU legislation and evaluates its likely impact.

如何解读东京审判对南京大屠杀遇难人数的认定

50多年来,我国学术界部分学者认为,东京审判的《判决书》对南京大屠杀遇难人数虽作出了"20万人以上"的总体估计,但连同文件中所称被毁尸灭迹者及其他因素,对中国法庭关于"30万人以上"的判定本质认可或并不排斥.2005年出版的《南京大屠杀史料集·东京审判》对《判决书》作了新译,进一步明确了其认定人数,连同毁尸灭迹的数字为"超过20万".因此,学术界有必要实事求是地重新解读东京审判的判词.对《判决书》判定屠杀人数作出新的解读,并不影响我们对南京大屠杀死难人数继续坚持既往的认识与判断,也并不影响对东京审判的总体评价;但是,不宜再过份强调东京法庭与南京法庭在判定南京大屠杀遇难人数上的一致性,应当如实地承认这两者之间事实上存在的差别.