制作并出售网游外挂应当构成犯罪

对于制作并出售网游外挂的行为,无罪说所持的大前提并不准确——相对的罪刑法定原则提倡刑法解释;"有利于被告人"原则不能成为刑法解释中的霸王条款;和谐社会强调的也不是一味的刑法谦抑而是宽严相济——因而不应为我们所采纳。该行为符合犯罪特征,应当予以刑事规制。     

论即时取得对占有改定的适用

即时取得是现代民法中保障交易安全的一项重要制度,占有改定作为动产交易的一项特殊交付方式应当适用即时取得制度。     

弘扬与时俱进的理论品质把握科学发展观的深刻内涵

与时俱进是马克思主义的基本理论品质,是中国共产党保持强大生命力的根本要求,理论创新和实践创新是马克思主义与时俱进品质的具体体现,科学发展观是马克思主义基本理论的再发展,是推动中国社会主义现代化建设的重要理论命题.     

我国侦查透明制度的建构

侦查是现代刑事诉讼程序一个重要构成部分。我国侦查理论与实践长期以来奉行侦查保密原则。事实上,侦查本质上是一种程序构造,理应符合程序正义的基本要求。因此,在坚持侦查保密原则不动摇的前提下,主张一定程度的侦查透明,这是程序正义的应有之义,也是现代法治国家的必然要求。侦查透明有其独立的理论依据和价值基础。要在我国实现侦查透明,必须相应地采取一些具体的措施。     

公正：构建和谐社会的伦理基石

和谐社会包括人与自然的和谐、人与社会的和谐以及人与自身的和谐。在和谐社会的诸多价值诉求中,公正是和谐社会的首要价值和伦理基石。构建和谐社会必须首先从美德公正和制度公正这两个维度着手。     

"以贷还贷"纠纷中的保证人责任--以最高人民法院公布判决书为对象

成文法体系下法律规则确定性程度的考察,由于最高人民法院定期公布裁判文书的举措,而成为可能。对最高人民法院公布裁判文书的比较发现:最高人民法院对以贷还贷的认定,在不同判决中采取了各自不同的标准,对以贷还贷纠纷中保证人承担责任的条件,也给出了不同甚至相互矛盾的理由,未能同案同判。相互矛盾和冲突的判决并存的现状表明,以贷还贷纠纷中保证人的责任,不啻是模糊的,甚至是混乱的。类似现象,损害了法律一致性、规则确定性原则的同时,必将抑制经济生活中保证人角色的发挥,加大人民法院(包括最高人民法院)案件数量的压力。建立案例约束制度,是增强法律可预测性的现实选择。     

有独立请求权的第三人制度中被告之探析

有独立请求权的第三人制度作为第三人制度的一种,其主要功能就是扩大诉讼解决纠纷的能力,实现诉讼经济.以两造对立的诉讼结构为基础,以诉讼合并理论为视角,对有独立请求权的第三人提起主参加诉讼之被告予以分析可以看出:主参加之诉的被告的确立,是以本诉的双方当事人为共同被告,还是以本诉的一方当事人为被告,取决于是否有利于实现查明案件事实,实现纠纷的一次性解决.     

Empathic emotions and justice in society

Empathy is defined as an affect more appropriate to another's situation than to one's own. The paper (i) summarizes different modes of empathic affect arousal; (ii) shows how empathic affect may interact with social-cognitive development, to produce four levels of empathy development; (iii) suggests that causal attributions may transform empathic affect into sympathy, guilt, and empathic anger, which are major moral affects; (iv) discusses how these affects may influence moral judgment and behavior; (v) points up empathic morality's limitations and the need to embed empathy in relevant moral principles; (vi) discusses possible links between empathy and justice principles, with special focus on Rawls; (vii) illustrates the interplay of empathy, moral judgment, and justice; and (viii) suggests that moral principles may become hot cognitions.     

Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences

A preliminary statement of a theoretical framework integrating psychological and societal determinants of justice in human affairs is presented. It is proposed that the social structure provides the rules of entitlement and decision making that regulate the course of routine social interaction. These societally based norms are representable in people's conscious thought processes. By contrast, the psychologically generated rules of entitlement, typically contradict conventionally accepted rules of thought and discourse and thus remain unconscious. The major part of the discussion considers the motivationally important circumstances that engage the unconscious psychologically compelling determinants and how their appearance in behavior is both shaped and legitimized by the situationally prevailing normative context. The final section considers some of the more important methodological, theoretical, and social policy implications of this social psychological theory of entitlements.     

How Surrogate Impact Panels Function in the Context of Intimate Partner Violence: A Mixed-Methods Study

ABSTRACT

Intimate partner violence (IPV) continues to be an urgent social problem, despite decades of intervention and prevention efforts. Restorative justice programs (e.g., victim impact panels) may be a useful addition to intimate partner violence (IPV) intervention, but it is unclear how these panels operate and to what extent they are consistent with restorative justice models. This naturalistic study of IPV surrogate impact panels used ethnographic observation of panels (n = 18), archival analysis of audience responses to the panel (N = 287), and focus groups and interviews (k = 4) with IPV survivors, an audience member, and batterer intervention providers to investigate these gaps. Findings suggest the panels manifest interactional processes consistent with restorative justice principles. Implications, limitations, and future aims of research on these panels are discussed.