建设和谐文化中编辑认知能力的思考

编辑对于建设和谐文化在构建和谐社会中的认知①是编辑文化应对时事的应有之意。建设和谐文化中,弘扬民族精神是编辑对中国传统文化最基本的认知所求;体现时代精神是编辑认知能力的核心要求;深刻认识建设和谐文化与构建和谐社会的关系是编辑认知能力的哲学思维;认识和明辨先进文化是编辑文化创新能力形成的基础;坚持社会主义核心价值体系是建设和谐文化的根本。     

党的先进性理论的发展轨迹探究

高度重视党的先进性建设是马克思主义政党一贯的态度和立场,从革命导师马克思、列宁、毛泽东到改革开放和现代化建设的总设计师邓小平,到承上启下的党的第三代领导集体的核心江泽民,再到以胡锦涛同志为总书记的新一届中央领导集体,都对党的先进性和先进性建设问题做了大量的论述和工作,从而使党的先进性理论逐步地发展和完善起来,并形成了党的先进性建设的比较科学完整的体系。为了推动今天党的先进性建设问题,我们有必要系统地对无产阶级政党的先进性理论进行探究和梳理,掌握其精神实质,了解其发展演变,以便为今天的保持党的先进性和开展保持党员先进性教育提供强有力的理论支持和方法论支持。     

保持党的先进性必须提高党的依法执政能力

党的十六届四中全会明确提出要增强党的依法执政能力。作为党的执政能力建设的一个重要组成部分,依法执政能力建设是保持党的先进性不可或缺的部分。必须从改革和完善党的领导方式和执政方式、强化现代法治理念、抓好制度建设、增强依法办事的自觉性四个方面提升党的依法执政能力,使党的先进性得以充分体现。     

走出生产力理论误区实现新世纪理论创新

江泽民"七一"讲话,从总结过去、瞻望未来、立足现实、面向世界的高度,对"三个代表"这一重要思想,给予了深入浅出的精辟论述和科学回答,表现了马克思主义与时俱进的理论品质,体现着解放思想和实事求是的结合、理论与实际的结合、继承运用与理论创新的结合.按照"讲话"关于"始终代表中国先进生产力的发展要求"同党的建设联系起来的精辟论述,认真清理建国后至十一届三中全会前长达30年之久的关于生产力理论的种种认识误区,更有助于深刻领会讲话是又一次思想解放和理论创新,对发展马克思主义做出了新的贡献.     

From AKP’s ‘Conservative Democracy’ to ‘Advanced Democracy’: Shifts and Challenges in the Debate on ‘Europe’

Abstract

Following the AKP’s victory in the 2002 general elections, ‘conservative democracy’ has emerged as a trademark in Turkish politics, focusing on cosmopolitanism and European integration. In the late 2000s, the party’s favourite notion was ‘advanced democracy’, this time underlining Turkey’s leadership claim in the region and displaying a more critical approach to ‘Europe’. In this paper, I aim to show how different narratives on ‘Europe’ emerged within the context of these empty signifiers. The paper claims that the difference in the two narratives on ‘Europe’ in two different periods does not point to a complete and fully fledged de-Europeanisation trend.     

中国共产党党章关于党员先进性要求的历史发展

保持共产党员先进性的要求,是马克思主义政党在其存在和发展的各个历史时期都必须面对的一个非常重大的课题。中国共产党自1921年诞生至党的十六大,先后制定、修改过十六次党章,还制定了相关文献,对保持共产党员先进性作了详细规定和论述,由此我们可以看出,中国共产党对保持共产党员先进性的要求是多方面、多层次、多角度的。     

服务劳动价值论--劳动价值论在服务生产领域中的拓展

第三产业的兴盛,一方面证实了新价值的创造(GDP)与劳动量(就业人数)之间存在着正相关的关系,另一方面对劳动价值论关于服务劳动非生产性的论断提出了重大挑战.必须将劳动价值论从物质生产领域向服务生产领域拓展,通过论证服务劳动的生产性来揭示服务劳动的使用价值创造过程、价值形成过程和剩余价值生产过程;同时也必须回答服务产品价值量的决定和生产价格决定,以及纯粹流通费用的补偿等基本问题.     

Three Modes of Thinking and Policy Orientation of Cultural Security

Three types of relations are entangled nowadays in dealing with issues concerning national cultural security on both the theoretical and practical levels: (1) the relation between one’s own culture and that of other ethnic groups; (2) the relation between advanced and underdeveloped parts of culture; (3) the relation between one’s ethnic culture and so-called foreign advanced culture as related to the previous two. Accordingly, three modes of thinking are likely adopted in handling issues concerning national cultural security: to antagonize one’s own culture with that of other ethnic groups, that is, taking the “me or you” attitude; to dualize cultures as the “advanced” and the “underdeveloped”, that is, believing things to be good if not bad, or vice versa; and to assert that the ethnic are the advanced, that is, taking the “only-megood” stance. It is a very demanding job to maintain national culture and to pursue cultural development at the same time. Only when cultures are grouped into those without distinction between the advanced and the underdeveloped and those with such distinction can the relation between the ethnic and the advanced be properly handled. With the former, it is essential to maintain the ethnicity of one’s own culture before the cultural security is safeguarded. With the latter, however, the pursuit of advanced cultures and the advocacy of the advanced part of a particular culture is a key to ensuring and safeguarding the national cultural security. Hence, it is important to enhance the public awareness of cultural security, and more essentially for the government to offer scientifi cally appropriate orientation towards cultural security and to frame related policies.     

指引先进文化发展方向的光辉旗帜--重读毛泽东《在延安文艺座谈会上的讲话》

纪念和学习《讲话》,应将其置于具体的“历史语境”中来把握,领会《讲话》蕴涵的精神实质。60多年的文艺实践表明,毛泽东文艺思想、邓小平文艺理论与“三个代表”重要思想中关于先进文化的论述一脉相承。《讲话》作为毛泽东文艺思想的重要内容,是我党文艺发展史上的基石和推动力。在实现中华民族伟大复兴的进程中,广大文艺工作者继往开来,与时俱进,《讲话》也将永远是指引中国先进文化发展方向的光辉旗帜。     

Is regulatory innovation fit for purpose? A case study of adaptive regulation for advanced biotherapeutics

The need to better balance the promotion of scientific and technological innovation with risk management for consumer protection has inspired several recent reforms attempting to make regulations more flexible and adaptive. The pharmaceutical sector has a long, established regulatory tradition, as well as a long history of controversies around how to balance incentives for needed therapeutic innovations and protecting patient safety. The emergence of disruptive biotechnologies has provided the occasion for regulatory innovation in this sector. This article investigates the regulation of advanced biotherapeutics in the European Union and shows that it presents several defining features of an adaptive regulation regime, notably institutionalized processes of planned adaptation that allow regulators to gather, generate, and mobilize new scientific and risk evidence about innovative products. However, our in-depth case analysis highlights that more attention needs to be paid to the consequences of the introduction of adaptive regulations, especially for critical stakeholders involved in this new regulatory ecosystem, the capacity and resource requirements placed on them to adapt, and the new tradeoffs they face. In addition, our analysis highlights a deficit in how we currently evaluate the performance and public value proposition of adaptive regulations vis-à-vis their stated goals and objectives.