反思我国强制医疗程序的适用

进入强制医疗程序视野的都是涉嫌暴力犯罪的被追诉人,所以存在刑事追诉与强制医疗程序衔接的问题。对于适用强制医疗程序的人,在审理方式和法律帮助方面,法律规定有待完善。建议设置不同类型的治疗措施,可以在妥善安置疑似精神病人的同时,加大强制医疗程序对维护社会秩序的力度;增加鉴定意见的内容,以便提前异议。     

重特大交通事故网络舆情的应对

在网络时代背景下,交通管理部门在处理重特大交通事故时,由于未来得及在思想、政策以及方式上做出相应改变,藉由网络的力量,使得一些重特大交通事故演变成全国,甚至国际关注的事件。重特大交通事故网络舆情的产生与发展有其制度性原因和工具性原因,因而应有相对应的临时处理措施和工具性处理措施。临时性处理措施的本质是坚持以人为本,实现个案正义;而工具性处理措施的核心是在了解其演变逻辑的基础上,注重网络舆情的搜集与调查,完善政府网络发言人制度以及政府新闻发言人制度。     

强制医疗程序司法运作中的问题与完善——以检察监督权的有效行使为视角

我国精神病人的强制医疗程序性质上属于刑事司法程序,兼具治疗精神病和防卫社会的目的,奉行入院中心主义。强制医疗在司法运作中仍存在启动程序不规范、适用标准不明确、检察监督不到位、配套机制不健全等问题。检察院应履行法律监督职能,加强对强制医疗启动程序、审查程序和审查标准、执行程序的监督,实现强制医疗公正、效率、安全和人道的制度价值。     

Violence prevention in psychiatry: an umbrella review of interventions in general and forensic psychiatry

Relative risks of violence in psychiatric patients are high compared to the general population and existing evidence in non-psychiatric populations may not translate to reductions in violence in psychiatric populations. We searched 10 databases including Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus, from inception until August 2015 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of violence prevention interventions in psychiatry. Reviews were included if they used a hard outcome measure (i.e. police or hospital recorded violence, or reincarceration) and contained randomized or non-randomized controlled studies. Five reviews met our inclusion criteria (n = 8876 patients in total), of which four received a GRADE rating of ‘low’ or ‘very low’. Three randomized studies (n = 636) reported that therapeutic community interventions may reduce reincarceration in drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental illness (‘moderate’ GRADE rating). The lack of intervention research in violence prevention in general and forensic psychiatry suggests that interventions from non-psychiatric populations may need to be relied upon.     

WTO国民待遇在服务贸易和知识产权领域的适用

乌拉圭回合之后,WTO国民待遇适用于服务贸易和与贸易有关的知识产权领域,产生了一些新的法律特点,在适用范围、适用客体及例外限制方面都有了新的变化:在服务贸易领域它从普遍义务走向特定义务,从无条件走向有条件;在与贸易有关的知识产权领域它由形式互惠转为实质互惠,适用于执法和司法救济过程,提高了整体保护水平。     

Why community compulsion became the solution - Reforming mental health law in Sweden

The aim of this article is to understand how compulsory community care (CCC) has become a solution in mental health policy in so many different legal and social contexts during the last 20 years. The recent introduction of CCC in Sweden is used as a case in point, which is then contrasted against the processes in Norway, England/Wales and New York State.In Sweden, the issue of CCC was initiated following high-profile acts of violence. Contrary to several other states, there was agreement about the (lack of) evidence about its effectiveness. Rather than focusing on dangerousness, the government proposal about CCC was framed within an ideology of integrating the disabled. The new legislation allowed for a broad range of measures to control patients at the same time as it was presented as a means to protect positive rights for patients. Compared to previous legislation in Sweden, the scope of social control has remained largely the same, although the rationale has changed — from medical treatment via community treatment and rehabilitation, to reducing the risk of violence, and then shifting back to rehabilitation in the community.The Swedish approach to CCC is similar to Norway, while New York and England/Wales have followed different routes. Differences in ideology, social control and rights orientations can be understood with reference to the general welfare and care regimes that characterize the four states.     

非婚同居的规制不会冲击结婚登记制度

结婚登记制度是非婚同居产生的制度条件,非婚同居不是对现行婚姻制度的冲击,非婚同居制度与结婚登记制度可以相得益彰。法律保护非婚同居,虽在一定程度上弱化婚姻法价值导向,但并没有动摇婚姻的主流地位,破坏家庭法目标的实现。婚姻危机无法缓解,并不能因此归责于法律承认和保护了非婚同居,而应正视和反思婚姻制度自身所面临的问题。法律对非婚同居的承认,并不排斥婚姻制度,人们根据自身的需要选择不同的两性结合方式。婚姻依然是人类自我延续和子女健康成长的必不可少的组织,应将婚姻置于优先保护的地位,赋予婚姻与非婚同居不同的待遇,婚姻家庭模式的主流地位得以巩固。     

论群体性治安突发事件行动中警组的先期处置

群体性治安事件突发的前期，正在该区域当值的警组首接指挥中心指令（或接到群众报警）后，常在警情紧、时间急的情况下，迅速赶赴事发现场进行先期处置。由于前期到达现场的警力有限，如何有效并妥善地先期处置事件，对于后续力量顺利处置群体性事件具有十分重要的意义。因此，先期处置的警组应明确其职责范围．行动中遵循及时性、安全性、适度性与保全性四大原则，按行动前的准备工作、行动的实施、事件后续处置的移交工作等三步骤有条不紊地实施，以减少失误，为成功处置该起群体性事件赢得先机。     

刑满释放人员就业歧视问题探究

刑满释放人员因受就业歧视、失业而再犯的问题越来越多,理应受到我们的关注。对刑满释放人员的就业歧视的原因在哪,是否具有合理性？文章从反就业歧视一般原理及刑罚理论论证其不合理性,并分析刑满释放人员就业权平等保护的意义。最后提出应从营造平等保护制度环境、强化歧视法律责任和实施积极行动等方面来保障刑满释放人员的平等就业权。     

中国——东盟投资自由化进程中的国民待遇问题探析

投资自由化是中国——东盟自由贸易区继贸易自由化之后一个更加深入和复杂的问题。文章基于《中国——东盟全面经济合作框架协议》、《中国——东盟全面经济合作框架协议投资协议》等基本法律文件,结合经济全球化的发展趋势和中国、东盟成员国吸引外国直接投资的相关实践,就外资待遇标准中的国民待遇作集中分析,以期明晰中国——东盟投资自由化发展方向和未来可能取得的成果。