论破产法上债务人高管人员民事责任的追究

The Enterprise Bankruptcy Law has designed the regime for debtor’s senior managers to bear civil liabilities, while the framework design concerning the prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities is still unclear. How to establish a prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities of debtor’s senior managers in line with the purposes of the bankruptcy regime is a substantial issue during the implementation of Enterprise Bankruptcy Law. The realization of the civil liabilities regime of debtor’s senior managers depends on the establishment and operation of a relatively well-developed prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities. The focus of the prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities is to determine the subject of prosecution of civil liabilities, the way to realize civil liabilities, and the special hearing proceedings and authorities of the court. Taking steps to clarify and improve the prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities focusing on the subjects of prosecution (debtor’s senior managers) and authorities of the court, is the essence and systematic safeguard of realizing the civil liabilities regime of debtor’s senior managers in the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law. Gan Peizhong, Ph.D, is a professor of law and director of the Research Center for Enterprise and Company Law at Peking University. Prof. Gan is a recognized expert on economic law, company law, bankruptcy law and the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. He has released numerous articles on Chinese law journals and published many books. His major publications include Encyclopedia of Chinese Economic Law (vice editor-in-chief), New Studies on Economic Law (co-editor), New Studies on Enterprise Law (author), Studies on Chinese Economic Adjudication (editor-in-chief), Studies on Foreign Economic Law in Beijing (editor-in-chief), General Theories on Economic Law (co-editor), Legitimate Exercise of the Corporate Control Rights (author). Moreover, he was named the “leading young and middle-aged jurist” by Beijing Law Society in 1999. In addition, Prof. Gan is the deputy-president of the Securities Law Association, a member of the Standing Committee of the Economic Law Association under China Law Society. He also serves as the consultant of the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPC Standing Committee and Beijing Municipal People’s Congress, as well as the Haidian District Court of Beijing.     

Private authority and public policy interactions in global context: Governance spheres for problem solving

Private organizations play a growing role in governing global issues alongside traditional public actors such as states, international organizations, and subnational governments. What do we know about how private authority and public policy interact? What are the implications of answering this question for understanding support for, and effects of, policy development generally? The purpose of this article is to reflect on these questions by introducing, and reviewing, a special issue that challenges explicit claims, and implicit methodologies, that treat private and public governance realms as distinct and/or static. We do so by advancing a theoretical and conceptual framework with which to explore how the contributions to this special issue enhance an understanding about governance interactions across a range of empirical, sectoral, and regional domains. We specifically introduce the concept of governance spheres to capture the proliferation of issue domains denoted by highly fluid interactions across public and private governance boundaries.     

试论人大监督权与司法独立

司法独立是司法公正的前提,保证司法的工作不受来自外界的不适当干预,才能保障法律的权威性。要实现司法公正也离不开对司法权的合理监督,而这种监督必须以尊重司法独立为前提。司法公正的实现,要求司法接受监督和司法保持独立这两项基本原则之间实现统一和协调。各级人民代表大会常务委员会对司法机关进行监督应遵循适当的原则与方式,人大监督必须以尊重司法独立为前提,必须把监督限制在一定的范围内,采取适当的方式和程序。     

暴力袭警：警察权威弱化的危险信号——从社会秩序结构谈暴力袭警产生的深层原因及对策

近年来,暴力袭警案件频繁发生,而且并未得到有效的遏制。暴力袭警的根本原因是警察权威的弱化。因此,解决暴力袭警问题的根本对策是警察权威的重新构筑和强化。分析警察权威,必须从社会秩序结构入手,搞清警察权威、治安规则和警察客体三者之间的内在联系。     

论刑事证人拒证行为的犯罪化

刑事证人拒证行为危害严重 ,且已达到了为国家和社会不堪容忍的程度。对其规制的惟一理性的选择是尽快完善刑事立法 ,将刑事证人拒证行为纳入刑法调控领域。     

“省直管县”相关概念辨析

近年来,国内关于“省直管县”体制改革的呼声越来越高,然而,学界在对“省直管县”体制改革进行研究的过程中普遍存在着概念混淆和滥用现象.本文对“市管县”、“省管县”、“财政省直管县”、“行政省直管县”、“强县扩权”、“扩权强县”等相关概念及其相互关系进行了分析,并在此基础上探讨了“省直管县”体制改革模式及其演进逻辑.     

转型时期权力腐败的伦理思考

从伦理学角度分析 ,权力腐败产生的主观因素就是个体道德、人性变异所引起的对利益的饥渴追求 ,客观因素就是社会道德价值多元化给腐败分子提供了滋长腐败行为的土壤。从伦理学上反腐 ,一方面要从个体道德“内”部防腐 ;另一方面则要从社会道德“外”部反腐     

贪官的路径:领导干部→心理失衡→腐败

本文从社会心理学的角度分析和阐述了某些贪官从领导干部蜕化变质 ,走上违纪之路甚至滑入犯罪深渊的种种表现、原因和预防对策。     

公司合并中债权人保护制度之法问题

公司合并涉及公司实体的变化,公司财产与债务的并归、转移,因而会对公司债权人产生相当的影响,为此,《公司法》专门设立了公司合并中债权人保护制度。债权人范围的确定、债权范围的确定、债权人保护制度的具体内容、债务公司不履行法定义务的法律责任等,是这一制度的关键问题。     

征地拆迁中的"权""利"制衡--某市高校新区征地拆迁个案研究

本文通过对某市高校新区征地拆迁个案进行研究,从一个动态的视角观察国家正式权力的行使边缘与村民自治的利益保障边界的消长关系和原因,并试图探讨当代农民的公平公正观念,从中窥视村民自治后农民与政府的新关系.