论民事举证责任分配制度

举证责任的分配是民事举证责任制度的核心问题,也是民事举证责任理论研究中最富有争议的问题。国内外理论界对民事举证责任的分配有多种学说。我国民事诉讼中,举证责任的分配实行“谁主张,谁举证”的一般原则和对特别案件实行的举证责任倒置原则,人民法院调查收集证据的补充原则以及无法确定举证责任的承担时,由人民法院根据公平和诚信原则,综合当事人的举证能力等因素来确定举证责任的承担原则。我国对民事举证责任的分配尚存在一些问题,有待在立法上进一步完善。     

欠发达省区毗邻地区区域协作的问题及对策

欠发达地区毗邻地区的区域协作是该地区对外开放的重要组成部分。欠发达省区毗邻地区应采取更加多形式、多层次、多方位的协作模式,建立更加开放、富有活力的协作机制。在短期内,应在交通、旅游、物流、信息、生态保护等领域有所突破。应通过灵活的税收、金融和统计政策,对特定领域的投资作出兼顾地区利益分配的政策调节,促进区域资源的整合与优化配置。     

In Praise of the Commons: Another Case Study

Common-pool allocation systems do not have the best of reputations in economic literature, since they are normally connected with the dissipation of rents. The present case study argues that in the case of procurement and allocation of human organ transplants a reciprocal common-pool allocation system is superior other systems, including market allocation.     

探析我国刑事诉讼中测谎权的配置问题

我国刑事诉讼中的测谎权是一种权力,单向配置给追诉机关.这一配置格局既忽视了测谎技术在刑事诉讼中的保护无辜功能,违背了刑事诉讼中控辩平等的基本原则,削弱了辩方的举证权和辩护权,也不能满足被追诉人单方主动提出测谎的现实需求.因此,我国刑事诉讼中的测谎权应当重新配置,赋予被追诉人有条件的独立测谎申请权,坚持测谎申请权与测谎决定权的结合.     

侵权法基本问题的经济学反思：比较的视角

损害具有相互性,损害并一定意味着必然有救济。对于＂受害者＂的救济应遵循财富最大化原则。侵权因果关系的认定虽然复杂,但是,不能因此而放弃对于因果关系分析,恰当的做法是由立法机关和司法机关对于因果关系类型化指引法官裁判。在风险增加的社会,传统归责原则凸显其局限性,社会财富最大化原则要求风险分担的社会化。     

论乡土社会的解纷规则及其优化配置

在乡土社会,人们依据各式各样的规则来解决彼此之间的冲突,制定法和习惯法、伦理道德、风俗习惯、宗教信仰等潜规则皆是被选择的对象。乡土社会的现实状况表明:如果将一切乡土冲突都强行纳入制定法的统辖范围,结果只会适得其反。因此,为了在乡土社会推行现代法治的同时不致破坏其秩序,就必须实现解纷规则的优化配置。     

公共选择理论与我国公安机关行政改革

我国的公安机关行政改革经过了多年的实践,虽然取得了一定的成就,但总体来说仍然停留在一个较低的层面上,目前的公共选择理论是近年来西方行政科学的新鲜理论,对我国包括公安改革在内的行政体制改革有深刻的启发意义。我们不仅可以利用公共选择理论来解释我国公安行政改革中存在的问题,而且也可以吸收公共选择理论中的科学与合理成分来改革公安工作,以增进效益、提高效率。     

The effect of inputs and performance outcomes on allocation decisions

This study used a 2×2×5 factorial vignette study to examine allocations. The factors included gender, task (cooperative vs. competitive), and information (ability only, diligence only, performance only, ability and performance, diligence and performance). The study confirms previous findings that allocations in competitive situations are more equitable than in cooperative settings. Further, allocations in diligence conditions are more equitable than those in ability conditions. However, results reveal that allocations based on knowledge about performance outcomes are different from those based on attributional inputs. The role of inputs and performance in the allocation process is discussed.     

Distributive justice: Theory and research

The concept of distributive justice and the theoretical and empirical work conducted on it during the past two decades are examined. Three questions provide the structure for this examination: (i) What are fundamental conceptual dimensions of distributive justice and the specific substantive issues to which they are related? (ii) What central questions has recent work on distributive justice addressed? and (iii) What are the most important emerging issues on which work in the near-term future should focus? Much of the theory and research examined in the paper is social psychological in nature, but reference is made to related work in related disciplines, particularly sociology and philosophy.     

政党功能的维度分析

政党在现代政治系统中发挥着不容忽视的功能,可以从三个维度加以界定和分析:利益代表维度、权力取向维度、桥梁沟通维度。这三个维度有各自内在的含义和价值,又有着紧密的联系性。