浅议公安院校的心理健康教育

通过对公安院校学生的心理健康状况的分析,可以看出公安院校学生的心理问题具有鲜明特点,这就要求公安院校应采取针对性的措施,实施有特色的心理健康教育,帮助学生提高心理健康水平,促进身心和谐发展,培养出合格的人民警察,将来才能承担起国家、社会、人民赋予的重任。     

商业贿赂犯罪立法比较研究

从世界范围看,商业贿赂犯罪有法典型、附属刑法型和耦合型三种立法模式,我国应当转换立法思维,采用耦合型立法模式。商业贿赂犯罪的主体范围应扩张至包括公司、企业或者其他单位的工作人员,避免出现处罚的空隙。商业贿赂犯罪的行为对象应当界定为利益,包括财产、财产性利益和非财产性利益。“为他人谋取利益”不应作为商业受贿罪的构成要件。对于商业贿赂犯罪,应当增设罚金刑和资格刑,商业受贿罪和商业行贿罪的刑罚应保持均衡。     

山东省农村留守儿童犯罪问题的调查与分析

山东省农村留守儿童的规模较大,已成为一个需要高度重视的群体。特别是西部经济欠发达地区,留守儿童占农村全部儿童的数量已达到一半以上。由于父母与孩子长期分离,家庭结构及其教育功能遭到严重破坏,给孩子的身心健康和行为规范等带来了一系列极其恶劣的影响。留守儿童的不良行为率比非留守儿童高24．50％,违纪率比非留守儿童高12．73％,违法犯罪率比非留守儿童高10．99％,并已达到令人吃惊的12．54％。因此,党和政府乃至全社会都应予以高度重视,把解决农村留守儿童问题当作头等大事来抓,切实为留守儿童营造出一个良好的社会和家庭环境。     

涉众型经济犯罪案件的侦查和处置

近年来．涉众型经济犯罪呈上升趋势,影响着我国社会经济发展和社会秩序的稳定,制约了构建和谐社会目标的实施．成为我国经济领域中严重的不和谐因素。该犯罪具有涉案金额巨大、涉及面广、危害严重的特点。针对涉众型经济犯罪的特点．侦查也应采用相应的侦查对策和处置方法。     

国外警察院校人才培养模式的要素化解析

以警察院校人才培养模式的构成要素为切入点,解析国外尤其是发达国家警察院校的人才培养模式,其在人才培养理念、培养目标、培养特色、培养资源运用、师资队伍建设、课程体系设置以及人才培养活动评估等方面表现出很强的针对性、实用性和实战性特征。     

论高等院校学生应用写作能力的培养

随着社会的发展,大学生的应用写作能力受到社会各界的普遍关注。然而在很多高等院校,应用写作教学却存在诸多问题。学生的应用写作知识贫乏,应用写作能力极为欠缺,与社会需求相去甚远。因此,高等院校在应用写作教学方面需加大力度,引导学生认清学习应用写作的重要意义,并从教学方法、实践训练、教学手段、教学评价等方面入手,全面提高应用写作的教学质量,培养学生的应用写作能力。     

论当代大学生科学人权观念的培育

公民人权观念的培育是建设社会主义政治文明的基础,对大学生人权观念的培育则是公民人权观念培育的先导。现阶段加强大学生科学人权观念的培育具有特殊的必要性和紧迫性。应用中国特色社会主义人权观教育学生,在人权特性、内容、享有主体以及与主权的关系上坚持普遍性与特殊性的统一、经济社会文化权利与政治权利的统一、个人人权与集体人权的统一、人权与主权的统一。目前,可以通过相关教材内容改革、师资队伍建设和课堂教学改革等途径,加强当代大学生科学人权观念的培育。     

论监察与检察协调衔接机制的构建

监督目标的同向性、监督对象的特殊性、监督优势的互补性使得监察与检察协调衔接机制的构建具备了现实基础。构建监察与检察协调衔接机制应坚持权力独立行使、合法性、合理性、合目的性等一系列原则;应在确保程序公正、实体公正的基础上,实现打击腐败犯罪效率的最大化;应以权责明晰、运转顺畅、程序规范、权利保障为构建标准。具体到操作层面,构建监察与检察协调衔接机制的具体内容包括：确定刑事立案的主体及时间节点;明确监察机关级别管辖的范围;规范留置措施的适用以及完善逮捕后讯问、换押、线索移送等其他技术性细节。     

Motive,Action, and Confusions in the Debate over Hate Crime Legislation

In this article I argue that the objections against hate crimes defined as separate offenses and in terms of group animus are misguided and are based upon a mistaken view of human action that does not see motives as constituent parts of complex actions. If we are going to have hate crimes legislation, there are no good formal reasons keeping us from having distinct offenses for hate crimes or from having ones defined in terms of group animus. My goal is to clear up a number of action-theoretical confusions that have led some theorists and jurists to raise objections that draw attention away from the real crux of the debate over hate crime legislation. Initially, I defend several considerations that weigh against an understanding of hate crimes legislation as being concerned exclusively or even primarily with character, belief, or motive. These considerations in turn help undercut the related concern that hate crime legislation violates free speech protections.     

Repositioning the corporate criminal: comparing and contrasting corporate criminal liability in Canada and Finland

ABSTRACT

Over the past two decades, a number of states in the Global North have introduced laws aimed at holding corporations criminally liable. While there is an important literature examining these legal regimes there is a paucity of comparative work interrogating the different political struggles and processes leading to corporate criminal liability (CCL) legislation. This paper addresses this lacuna by comparing and contrasting the development of CCL in Canada and Finland. By scrutinizing the law reform processes in each jurisdiction, the paper documents how CCL emerged under different conjunctures in each country, yet were shaped similarly by hegemonic beliefs in the non-criminal status of corporation, the importance of advancing private enterprise and established jurisprudence. Of particular note are the ways in which dominant notions of legal individualism and the universal legal subject constrained legislative efforts to hold corporations criminally to account therein preventing corporate misconduct from being processed as “real” crimes.