区域协同立法博弈分析

区域协同立法是适应区域经济一体化发展的立法体制创新。这一创新过程的实质是代表各利益主体的立法机关之间的复杂博弈,既有基于观念分歧的立法理念的“博弈”,也有基于利益冲突的策略型重复博弈。针对可能出现的博弈困境,应建立学习与交流机制以提升各方对区域协同立法的认知水平,并充分照顾到各方正当利益,以提高各方的协作意愿;应以促进区域市场有效运作为导向规范各行政区的立法行为,建立双边或多边协商机制,逐步提升协同立法的水平。     

对“宪法——富强”思维范式的再思考

20世纪80年代以来的中国,实行以经济建设为中心,坚持改革和开放的经济政策,制定和完善了保障财产权的法律法规,使人们获得了广泛的经济自由以及私有财产的安全,这不仅向立宪主义的价值迈出了实质性的一步,而且使我国获得了持续二十多年的经济繁荣,并验证了个人自由对于经济发展和社会进步的巨大推动作用。     

保险诈骗罪特殊主体立法模式的缺陷及重构

保险犯罪日趋频繁和复杂,保险诈骗完全可能由投保人、被保险人和受益人以外的人或单位实施,现行刑法关于保险诈骗罪主体的规定范围过于狭窄,在理论和实践上均会产生一系列弊端。应摒弃特殊主体的立法模式,确立一般主体的立法模式。     

《共同纲领》与国民经济恢复时期的国家经济建设

本文初步解读和简要概述了《共同纲领》中新民主主义经济方针的基本内容和历史针对性。《共同纲领》是中国共产党长期探索新民主主义经济理论的思想结晶。从理论属性说,它不是社会主义的,而是新民主主义的。从实践方面说,它成功引导了国民经济恢复时期的国家经济活动。     

欠发达省区毗邻地区区域协作的问题及对策

欠发达地区毗邻地区的区域协作是该地区对外开放的重要组成部分。欠发达省区毗邻地区应采取更加多形式、多层次、多方位的协作模式,建立更加开放、富有活力的协作机制。在短期内,应在交通、旅游、物流、信息、生态保护等领域有所突破。应通过灵活的税收、金融和统计政策,对特定领域的投资作出兼顾地区利益分配的政策调节,促进区域资源的整合与优化配置。     

论《反不正当竞争法》一般条款的适用

随着市场经济竞争的日趋激烈,各种新型不正当竞争行为层出不穷,为了加强对正当竞争主体的保护,应明确《反不正当竞争法》一般条款适用的条件、一般条款适用的限制规定,创造一个公平竞争的市场交易环境。     

澳大利亚反恐怖主义立法述评

为应对日益严重的恐怖主义威胁,澳大利亚加快了反恐怖主义立法的进程,澳大利亚反恐怖主义法对基础性概念进行界定,增设了恐怖主义犯罪罪名,完善恐怖主义犯罪的诉讼程序,对有关部门进行特殊授权,并且严格了对澳大利亚本土的防范措施.澳大利亚反恐怖主义立法采用附属式的立法模式,并涉及预防、处置及制裁等多重内容,体现了普通法系的"程序优先"的特征,极大地扩张了国家行政权力.随着反恐斗争的开展,普通法系国家愈加重视制定法的作用.但是,反恐怖主义立法引发的人权问题、民族问题和宗教问题也是值得深思的.     

Normative and Civilisational Regionalisms: The EU,Russia and their Common Neighbourhoods

The contours of regionalism in a wider Europe are shaped by two dominant actors, the European Union (EU) and Russia, which often have divergent visions of the regional landscapes in a vast area constituting their common neighbourhood. The EU can be characterised as the promoter of normative regionalism, while Russia generates different forms of civilisational regionalism. Russia’s emphasis on the civilisational underpinnings of its regional integration model paves the way for two different strategies: one based on liberal imitation and replication of EU experiences in order to strengthen Russia’s position in the global neoliberal economy, and another grounded in illiberal contestation of the normative premises of the EU with the purpose of devising an ideologised alternative to the liberal West.     

亲情正义与规则正义的冲突与调和——基于亲情案件引发舆论争议的思考

亲情正义与规则正义的立论基础不同,导致涉亲情案件中依法律规则的裁判结果与社会的情感评价可能冲突。亲情正义强调亲情伦理,思考问题充满感性和区别对待,更注重亲情带来的义务要求。而规则正义强调法律至上、理性思考、权利与义务的统一,注重平等对待。为弥合二者冲突,借鉴不同地方的法治经验实属必要。立法和司法也应更积极回应亲情正义的要求,清晰界定涉亲情案件中对事、对人的适用范围,尊重当事人的选择,如此方能实现法律与情理的合理互动。     

Labour and the Culture Wars of Modern Politics

Anyone who attempts to understand and reverse the major defeat suffered by Labour in the December 2019 general election needs first to appreciate why comparisons with the defeats of the 1980s are so unhelpful. In 1983 Labour was all but wiped out across southern England, but held on comfortably across the ‘red wall’. By contrast, in 2019 Labour did well in cities and university towns across the south, and appears to have solved its historic problem with the southern, educated middle class. However, this has been at the expense of alienating working class voters across the country, not just in its former industrial heartlands. But this is not inevitable. A reanalysis of testimony from hundreds of interviews with working people across England from the 1940s onwards allows insights into attitudes and values that are often obscured by survey techniques. Crucially, it points to a broad-based vernacular liberalism at odds with the culture wars model of a terminal crisis for social democracy.